Hello bajtársak and fellow forumdwellers,suggestions; Battle Ratings category and many users eagerly participated in the polls, demonstrating that BR changes are widely anticipated by the community, despite this only 4 BR changes were announced in the recent patch notes.
This is exteremely disappointing, I collected all battle rating change suggestions with at least 75% support or higher. All of them are purely BR change suggestions thus each change would only take up a few minutes to do but could be a massive improvement to many players.@Euthymia07-live @JestersTM please pass these to the devs so they can implement some into the upcoming major update.
Chi-Nu II from BR4 to BR3 (95% voted yes)
For such a long time, people have been saying this tank being BR4 is strange, yet there’s been no response at all. I believe there must be a reason for this.
If you know the reason, please write it here.
Also, if you think it should be BR3, please write “Yes” in the survey below.
Chi nu II should be BR3.
poll
Fiat G.55 from BR4 to BR3 (87% voted yes)
The Fiat G.55 is currently a BR4 fighter plane, and while it has excellent handling, it belongs on BR3 more than BR4. The turn time of this plane is incredible at 15.59 seconds, but it’s guns and bombs are rather lackluster in comparison; a single 20mm cannon with 250 rounds and four 12.7mm machine guns with 1,200 rounds and a pair of 100 kg bombs. While you can engage other aircraft and bomb the way it is, it is in no way close to other BR3 and BR4 planes. Here’s the stats of the G.55 compared …
StuG III F from BR3 to BR2 (85% voted yes)
poll
The StuG III F is NOT a BR III Tank destroyer. The StuG III F has armor similar to the Panzer III J1, No machine gun, and It also lacks a turret. Please move it down to BR 2. I have seen people talk about this a lot so I also decided to make a suggestion about this!
FB-3 from BR2 to BR1 (92% voted yes)
poll
[image]
The FP3 is currently a BR2 fighter in the US tech tree, but it is underpowered at BR2 and is incredibly similar to an existing BR1 plane. It is pretty average in every regard, four 12.7mm machine guns and two 100 pound bombs. This is the exact same armament as the F2A-3 Buffalo which is already on BR1, and the only noticeable differences between the two is that the FP-3 has 500 more ammo for the 12.7mm machine guns (1800 rounds vs 1300)…
Bf-109 G-14 from BR5 to BR4 (96% voted yes)
To be considered alongside La-7 to BR 4 (If it has already been suggested, apologies…I did not see it in search history)
Move the La-7 to BR4 - Suggestions / Battle Rating - Enlisted
No need for a long winded comparison. La-7 is pretty much a copy paste stat wise of the BF 109 G14, except it has the advantage of bombs
[image]
La-7 has been forwarded for Consideration.
Suggestion is, Where La-7 goes, BF 109 G-14 goes
poll
It also requires a bomb to be added but that has been forwarded alr…
La-7 from BR5 to BR4 (88% voted yes)
poll
The La-7 is currently a BR5 fighter for the Soviet Union, and there, it is not as good a choice compared to other planes. The direct competitors are the I-185 M82 and the Su-9. While the La-7 has good flight performance in comparison to these other 2 planes (turn time and climbing speed most notably, although much slower than the Su-9 and worse climb), it simply has a much worse armament than the other 2. While the La-7 has two 20mm cannons with 340 rounds total and two 100kg bombs, the I-1…
A6M3 from BR3 to BR2 (81% voted yes)
poll
The A6M3 is a fighter currently on BR3, but it is more suited for BR2 in it’s current state. This plane is a slight variation of the A6M2 (which is BR2), and it has the following noticable differences:
-It has a drop tank as ordinance, but it isn’t really effective at anything really
-80 more rounds for the 20mm cannons (nice, since the A6M2 loses it’s power very fast with the small supply of 20m ammo) and 40 more rounds for the 7.7s (although this is negligible, the difference between 13…
Panzerwerfer 42 from BR4 to BR3 (85% voted yes)
poll
The Panzerwerfer 42 is a rocket artillery vehicle that is currently on BR4, but is underpowered for the battle rating. This is due to a few factors, but one of the largest being it’s armor, which seeing as how it’s essentially a half-track, even heavy machine guns 12.7mm or bigger can destroy it, which you can strafe with on most US and soviet aircraft, can easily cut through the armor, not to mention any anti-tank weapons or cannons.
The self-defence capability of this vehicle against inf…
Soumi KP/-31 from BR5 to BR4 (87% voted yes)
poll
The Suomi KP/-31 is a BR5 SMG on a premium squad for Germany, and it is a good gun, but it is more in line with BR4 level weapons. In comparison with the PPD-40 and PPSH 45 which are both located on BR4, most stats are quite similar, however it fires slightly slower than these both (990 vs 1040), but has a slightly faster reload speed (2.9 vs 3.1), however these differences are rather minor, with both guns feeling pretty much the same to use. Because of that, I propose lowing the Suomi KP/-…
Mkb42(H) from BR5 to BR4 (81% voted yes) and (87% voted yes) in two seperate polls!
poll
This post was created without the usage of AI.
[image]
At BR5, the MKB-42 is hopelessly outmatched by the MP-43 and STG-44. On top of that, compared to the STG-45, the MKB-42(H) performs much more like a side-grade, with a slightly higher rof but overall lower accuracy.
At BR4, the MKB-42(H) would act as a solid alternative to the Kiraly, trading the higher DPS and higher magazine capacity for better performance at longer distances.
I sincerely doubt that it would be broken if moved dow…
MKB42 H is obsolete in BR5, and even in BR4 would have rather poor rate of fire and damage potential - but would make for an interesting mid range alternative to Kiralys devastating close range power.
Also Germany more or less invented the assault rifle - so it should pretty much be the “assault rifle nation”
IL-10 from BR5 to BR4 (85% voted yes)
poll
We can see now il-8 had joined to the enlisted with more powerful bombs and it is better operability than il-10.So it seems that il-10 keeping stay in br5 is not a good choice.
Panzer IV/70(V) from BR5 to BR4 (78% voted yes)
poll
[image]
The Panzer IV/70(V) is a solid side-grade to the Panther, trading a turret for a better frontal armor profile while retaining the same cannon. It would be a solid choice for anyone running BR4 who wants a good tank hunter.
Marder III H from BR3 to BR2 (91% voted yes)
poll
[image]
The Marder III H is yet another side-grade to a vehicle in a lower BR, this time being the Marder III. It has better cover for the still-exposed crew and slightly better performance on its APCBC round, but it’s held back by its ammo load out.
[image]
The Marder III H loses HE rounds and APCBC rounds and instead gets APCR, which is situational at best and detrimental at worst, meaning that if you live long enough then eventually the Marder III will have better firepower.
Panzer IV/70(A) from BR4 to BR3 (76% voted yes)
poll
[image]
The Panzer IV/70(A) is another side-grade to the Panzer IV(H), trading the turret for a slightly better armor profile and an upgrade in firepower. It retains the same weak spots as its turreted brother, making it killable even by most BR2 tanks it would face.
Jagdpanzer IV from BR4 to BR3 (79% voted yes)
poll
[image]
Similarly to the Panzer IV/70(V), the Jagpanzer IV is a side-grade to its respective BR’s main tank, this time being the Panzer IV(H). The Jagpanzer IV trades a turret for a better frontal armor profile while retaining the same firepower.
Ho-Ni III from BR3 to BR2 (90% voted yes)
Than what about Ho-Ni I, down to BR1?
The current dilemma is that TD is not needed in the game.
Horn StG from BR5 to BR4 (86% voted yes)
poll
