Why did you nerf Breda PG Carcano but not Fedorov Avtomat or Gorov “machine guns”?
Why wasn’t the body armor protection removed?
18 Likes
There’s nothing to be learned about this in a test server. It’s the same as locked custom game. Almost always one human and every other single soldier on both teams is a bot. No planes, bot tanks.
1 Like
Excatly where can i sign this statement. 9 men will still be the meta but all you do is buff all the stupid HE BS make jets nearly impossible to shoot down with normal AAs… you introduced bomb sight, well now you can even get in effective range to shoot those f ers down. IF we want to play a vehicle first game, we could just play WOT or WT. And why are you always nerfing why not Buff the other stuff, i will never get my head around of the idea.
For someone in a pretty popular clan i find it pretty pathetic you don’t have the skill to destroy them with AA… console noobs can even do that.
It is true that the jets are hard to shoot down with buildable single 2cm AA alone. Jets have different “HP pool” for their damage model components i assume, that’s why they are much harder to shootdown even when you hit them multiple times with 2cm AA than the normal prop engine airplanes.
I’m kinda disappointed, where are the BR changes? This makes the second “major” update without a single change, unless something changes before release. It’s not like there’s a shortage of things that could be rebalanced (cough cough XA-38)
And also:
Genuinely what the hell? Why are we nerfing a mid semi auto rifle, and not the Federov, of which was also going to get recoil nerfs when they were first attempted? And why doesn’t the Gorov get worse recoil as well when it’s also an SFR?
7 Likes
It’s really not… you can kill them easily when they dive.
lol… Remove… rifles… from rifleman?
What is it of your concern anyway… Mr I don’t play past BR3.
I don’t even understand that opinion anyway… it’s a luxury you get when you get to the big boy tier that all of your scrubs get automatic weapons.
Omg, no squad size increase for jeeps. We basically got 4 wheel bikes. Ggs.
2 Likes
Select fire rifles. Why are you not surprised sniper rifles or anti-tant rifles aren’t available to riflemen?
Everything can change.
Besides, full auto armies have nothing to do with WW2.
1 Like
Yeah. Neither does BRV as a whole… what’s your point?
See point in thread
Again with what I said after… they aren’t assault rifles or smgs so don’t belong on assaulter… your class is cool yknow whatever… but again you get the luxury of having all autos when you get to BRV
It’s not hard to accept.
Your point is that sf on everybody isn’t ww2. Yeah well neither is everybody having end of war weaponry and prototypes either… so how is that relevant?
Irrelevant… like a lot of things you bring up.
And once again… what business is it of yours anyway? It has absolutely zero effect on you… or shouldn’t if it does now.
You don’t even play IV… so don’t say that either… and you wouldn’t until they get +0 matchmaking… I don’t know why I waste effort making responses to you.
If you don’t know or don’t understand that’s on you.
Go read the thread and if you have an opinion, express it with logic, not with “why you care hurr durr”.
1 Like
Theyre not touching assault rifles obvviously - i dont see Scotti rifle here do I??
as for FINALLY NERFS to Battle rifles - just pull the trigger on this already, people attached to their battle rifle slop will always complain, just do it and let the meta shake out. You can adjust afterwards
It means making every BR5 weapon a literal laser to compensate for how UNREALISTIC battle rifles are, so no, nerf em to their even quasi historical norm - aka uncontrollable on full auto when standing past 50m
Agree, lets finally allow MG/assault rifles, flame throwers and every other weapon be meta in BR5.
2 Likes
So, now that the second test is out, it seems that the visibility with the Type 11 LMG on the kurogane is better than during the first testing:
But as you can see, this video really proves my point with the awkardness and impracticality of this mount, especially when aiming on the sides: the guy manning the gun literally has his ass outside of the vehicle when aiming on the sides because the buttstock pushes him back and prevents him from standing properly or at least have a more “comfortable” position. It’s not that much better when aiming towards the front of the vehicle, because the guy is nearly sitting on the spare wheel at the rear. And the worst part is also that fact that the Type 11 LMG is installed too far forward for this mount to be realistic, which means that if this mount was realistic, the guy using the gun would be pushed even further at the rear.
@Euthymia07-live how is that supposed to be realistic ? It just looks so weird and goofy. I’ve already made a topic about a possible replacement of the gun, and only the gun (and the replacement option is already in the game), not the whole vehicle to be more realistic and historically accurate while not affecting too much its current stats here :
I’ve already quite a fair amount of votes in favour of that option, so I hope the devs will consider it.
Pretty please 
4 Likes
Wow. You are just clueless.
1 Like
Im for quasi realistic experience of WW2/1946 type what if for BR5. That means weapons that did/could have seen service. That obv means flamers that infact were meta right after merge - if u have amnesia or not I can only guess.
Battle rifles/SFRs are a technological dead end, and were only kept in service as a bad doctrinal choice by nato up until Vietnam proved them to be dogs*it compared to any AR. Their use in Enlisted is utterly ahistorical and technically unrealistic
1 Like
Another person unaware of the environment of 5 as a whole.
Atleast unlike veekay you actually play in its tier therefore making your opinion even considerable.