How exactly? 20+ people can easily totally change outcome of average poll on this forum.
these suggestions and their polls each have around 50 to 100 voters while before polls 30 likes were ground breaking. Bigger sample size → more accurate data on opinions.
You need more than 20 to push something controversial like 15cm SIG uptier now.
I wiould cut the mg out and weld turret in place to get better armor and shell values. That excuse is such a bullshit reason. It’s a cherry on top but has little to no importance when it comes down to it. I can easily play a full game without using a tank mg and can easily use the stugs effectively with no turret. The ONLY viable reason to downtier stugs is to remove all HE shells. Otherwise there is no reason to use a normal tank of a tank destroyer/stug. They should be implemented as tank hunters for this to make any sense.
La7 isn’t that great. Germany has comparable 109s and fiat. Ki-100 is better plane and is two tiers lower. Doesnt have big bombs, and is not a significant threat at all. Germany also has the 109z that will shread it to pieces
The fact it was controversial to begin with shows how strong the german bias is among players. It can 1 hit a super pershing and is2 frontally. No turret and mg doesn’t work here in the slightest for it being br2. Such a joke
Alecto is still BR2, no one is bothered by that ![]()
It’s a turd on wheels in comparison. The heat rounds absolutely suck. Plus ya know…open top, no mg, no turret
Lol
thats not even the biggest issue with 15cm sig though.
Open top and paper armour is.
I tried 15cm sig the first time I unlocked it than revert back to Panzer IV F1 because slower reload for bigger bomma with all the downsides is simply not worth it.
But anyway, you made a fool of yourself.
ironic that the same disadvantages dont matter for you on Axis vehicles.
ironic that the same disadvantages dont matter for you on Axis vehicles.
Stug is way more viable than alecto. There’s no argument there.
And its does matter or else I’d say the sturm should be br4 with that kind of fire power
Brs should be set in accordance to enemy tank comparisons and not your own
Brs should be set in accordance to enemy tank comparisons
GG.
lets compare 15cm sig than.
most comparable vehicle in game: Alecto (BR2)
better tanks in similar roles: KV-2, M4A3 (105), Chi-Ha short gun… All BR3.
enclosed, machine gun, turret, KV-2 and M4A3 are well armoured too.
thats not even the biggest issue with 15cm sig though.
Open top and paper armour is.
I tried 15cm sig the first time I unlocked it than revert back to Panzer IV F1 because slower reload for bigger bomma with all the downsides is simply not worth it.
But anyway, you made a fool of yourself.X BloodBandit X@live:
Dregoz even made a post detailing all of his weaknesses so that he would stay in BR 2
You can easily destroy majority of US BR3-5 tanks with panzerwerfer’s rockets.
And yet fail to kill a single tank from the USSR above BR 2.
Lol. German bias so funny. Most those suggestions are ridiculous and of course they going to get voted in because most people here favor germany
Whats ridiculous about those suggestions exactly?
Agree with this, rather disappointing those were the only changes this update especially after the poll system was introduced. I think suggestions with 60+ percent approval could also be implemented, but as more of a trial change instead of a permanent one since the votes are a bit more divided, lasting the duration of one major update to test how the change affects balance. If there aren’t any problems, it stays, but if it’s too strong, it gets moved back. Here’s all of the ones with 60+ percent that you didn’t already list.
SIG 150mm to BR3 (61% approval)
poll [image] I feel like this one might be the most controversial, but the 15 cm Sig does not deserve to be BR3. It’s main strength is it’s raw firepower, but it’s entire crew is exposed and it has no armor on top of being a case mate. I’ve personally never had a problem facing it because they are ridiculously easy to kill, that’s the whole point. Compared to something like the M8 Scott I believe this is valid. It also doesn’t have a machine gun.
Luftfaust to BR2 (69% approval)
poll The luftfaust is basically a useless meme weapon. It’s not on the same level as the Panzerfaust 100 at BR4. At low BRs you could maybe use it to shoot down the slower flying aircrafts and have a reason to sacrifice all of your AT gunner’s anti-tank abilities
MP 717r to BR4 (64% approval)
poll The MP 717r is an old Stalingrad Pass owner weapon that is currently on BR5, however I believe that it should be on BR4 instead, and that is because it is on par, if not ever so slightly weaker, than some quite similar BR4 SMGs, the PPD 40 and PPSH 45, which I will compare to the MP 717r. On the PPSH 45’s debut, it was originally BR5, but was later moved down to BR4. In comparison with the MP 717r, they have a fire rate about 200 RPM faster (1040 of both Russian guns vs 960 of the MP 717r),…
Tiger E to BR4 (62% approval)
poll The Tiger H1 is well balanced on BR4, and is a fun to play tank. The Tiger E only has an extra machine gun mounted on top (which few people use anyways) and a slightly more protected cupola, but is otherwise the exact same tank as the BR4 tank and feels near identical when you use it. This makes it obsolete compared to other options for BR5 tanks, as it has both worse armor and a much less sufficient gun to combat BR5 tanks reliably. As a result, you rarely ever see these tanks used, which…
Breda 88 to BR1 (73% approval)
poll The Breda 88 is an attacker aircraft sitting at BR2, and while it’s an alright plane, I believe it is BR1 material as it is. The flight characteristics are pretty average for low BR, the triple 12.7mm machine guns located in the nose are decent but nothing special at all, and the bomb load, consisting of three 100kg bombs, is a weak for a BR2 attacker aircraft, but seems fair for BR1, since the Potez 633 has dual 200kg bombs. For these reasons, I propose to lower the Breda 88 to BR1.
And here’s two others with over 75% approval that weren’t included in your list
J2M3 to either BR3 or 4 (94% approval, 48% for BR4 and 36% for BR3)
The J2M3 is a BR5 fighter plane avalible in the Japanese tech tree, and while it is a capable fighter, I suggest that it is lowered to BR4. With a decent set of guns and good handling, you can do a lot with it, however the better N1K2-J is also on BR5, and is an overall improvement - More ammunition for the 20mm cannons, faster, and turns slightly better, and all while having the same guns and payload, which leads to the J2M3 being just a weaker copy in effect. At BR 3 or 4 however, this would b…
Both Ki-61s to BR3 (89% approval)
The Ki 61s are fighter planes avaliable on B4 Japan, one in the tech tree and the other as a premium. While they are decent planes, they are currently pretty overteired. These planes were based off of the BF 109 (E or F series I think) and is pretty similar in a lot of regards, but quite different in others. The flight performance of these planes is rather similar to other nations’ fighters rather than the normal quick turn speed Japanese fighters. As for armament, Both Ki 61s have dual 100kg bo…
I didnt include the first one because its confusing, while I accidently skipped/overlooked the second one. A honest mistake really.
Hm, I can imagine it being smart to focus on the Soviet vs Japs content before getting the hand dirty with those other balance changes - but you guys are right that most of them are very obviously good suggestions that dont take much effort to implement.
Developers already said to forum: VOTES AND LIKES DO NOTHING.
Even if there was 100 voted yes but developers say no - it will not be done.
these suggestions and their polls each have around 50 to 100 voters while before polls 30 likes were ground breaking. Bigger sample size → more accurate data on opinions.
Weird, since on average I have seen polls to have ±40 people participating. Definitely not 100. Unless its some official news poll.
Bigger sample size → more accurate data on opinions.
Opinions that are usually not backed up by arguments. And very often they are not discussed at all.
Since polls introduction, I have somehow lost interest in forums. People tend to attach more importance to these polls than they actually deserve.
It’s not really about that suggestions with high positive polls ratio should be implemented. More like about suggestions with negative polls ratio not to be even forwarded to devs. That’s all.
Holy cope
Depends really.
For example the silenced ppsh which was NOT added to tech tree because people went ballistic over it being a fake gun.
But then depsite the wishes of 80% of the players, devs ended up adding it anyway as a premium a few months later.
So its true that devs can do anything they want but player opinions obviously matter to them even if they only care as long as its convinient for them.