I mean yeah if you discount the Scotti and federov I’m sure you would think that. You know the up till recently only two br 5 assault rifles with less than 30 rounds.
Yes apparently the Thompson 30 cal has mg81 levels of recoil. Git gud
Forgot that one exists, didnt bother to grind it.
Which I also forgot. Technically automatic rifle, but soviets suffer so much that they need little bit better treatment.
bait. russia suffers so much they only have the best of each weapon type at br 5 along with extra health compared to every nation. And you forgot the up till recently only 2 sub 30 round assault rifles in br 5.
I see little bit room to buff more there.
Sure, regardless can they ohk or not, still surpassed rather heavily by SF rifles.
Dont really pay attention for AR’s.
buddy. imma talk slow cuz that may be all you can comprehend. So mkb42m sub 30 round assault rifle in br 4. People say its br 5 level. yet br 5 assault rifles are either 30 round or sub 30 and can one shot vitality. so this isnt br 5 level. understand?
fedorov avtomat and scotti naval rifle deal above 13.5 damage so they can OHKO soldiers with vitality
1 Like
The real issue should be the M2 Carbine should be moved to the Assault class
You are saying that it’s better than the mkb despite it having more recoil making it annoying to use at range.
So by that logic what i said is what you believe. it doesn’t make sense and you are only saying it to try and back up your argument… and you making responses like that only proves it.
You can ignore the argument and say get good… not new to me.
you are claiming the thompson 30 cal isnt controllable. I am telling you it is controllable. this is cuz i am better at controlling recoil than you. so it is a skill issue on your part
I never said that… it’s just a fact that it’s easier to hit long range shots with mkb and that its plain better.
You take one guy from one end of d day pit and one at the other i guarantee you for anyone it’s easier to hit that shot with mkb… scotti isn’t better than stg just because a god tier player knows how to use it correctly.
7.3 damage at 200 vs 5.5 i think i know which one is better.
I even just tried it out and yeah it’s not bad even at range but it will take more effort to kill and does less damage especially since you want to bring up one shotting with vitality… for those two facts it’s better… you can defend it i’m just noting that it’s ridiculous to claim that… especially if you want to use it to back up whatever argument you have.
AH YES I LOVE HOW MANY 200M PLUS ENGAGEMENTS THIS GAME HAS. Be dumb on someone elses time dude this is just desperate. 2 shotting up to 100 meters is more than sufficient if ur not a camping little pussy lmao
Why are you being so obnoxious and vulgar? Take the attitude back to the reddit.
becuz ur argument is entirely asinine and why should i take someone seriously who is unironically saying “but the 30 cal thompson only 2 shots up to 100 meters its so bad 
”
Ironic for someone so hooked up on damage breakpoints.
yeah whenever at point blank range it matters. it matters a little bit more than at 200 meters or whatever cope ur spouting. I fight a few more people at 10 meters than at 200 meters. What are you even doing to get into 200 meter fights???
I don’t get why you are surprised i’m using points to back up and argument?
cuz ur points are just so inexpliably dogshit
Ok, and you are saying it’s better than assault rifle by class in game which has less recoil and more damage… therefore making it better… sure the 30 cal is king in cqc i wont deny especially with its damage per br and class.
damage difference doesnt matter in 99 percent of fights and recoil is a skill issue. So yeah having a faster ttk and 1.6 second reload makes it better. especially if it got buffed dispersion