MP40 description update, MP38 damage adjustment and the MP40 (early) as a new gun

Hello bajtársak and fellow forumdwellers,
First of all, I apologise for the long title. I had to pack a lot into this suggestion because most of these are related. Please allow me to quickly explain MP40 production changes as it will get relevant soon.


From the MP38 to the in game MP40


Germany went to war with the MP38, however the MP38 required a lot of milling and rare materials to produce, to increase production the MP40 was adopted which was produced by sheet metal stamping steel therefore heavily reducing the need for special materials and labour time.
Only the barrel, the bolt, the locking nut, and a few small components that couldn’t be made otherwise, were exempt from being replaced with sheet metal.

This gun is NOT the MP40 in the game, the only notable difference between this early MP40 the MP38 are a sturdier ejector, a stronger extractor and the elimination of the hole in the magazine catch which only served to reduce the weight of the MP38, however the MP40 was already lighter.

large_000000
So far the MP40 looks like this, except for the magazine. I’m sorry but I just could not find one picture in reasonable quality that got every single detail right.
This is the magazine it should have: (notice the smooth surface)
smooth mag

The MP40 gradually replaced the MP38 production and MP38 was fully terminated in 1941.
This variation of the MP40 continued to be produced until 1942, it’s hard to track the exact date and numbers produced because changes were introduced gradually and not at the same time with all manufacturers.

- Improvements introduced to the MP40 with war time experience -

In mid 1941 the smooth magazine catch was replaced with a sturdier and textured magazine catch which increased reliability and gave the soldiers a better grip on the weapon.

In early 1942 the smooth magazine was replaced with a ribbed one, with guiding rails added inside that massively increased reliability. Earlier smooth magazines were recalled by 1943.

The wolfteeth cocking handle which was prone to accidents was replaced with a safer cocking handle. Guns with wolfteeth handles were recalled multiple times but roughly 20% of MP40 guns with wolfteeth escaped this.

A new safer muzzle protector made from rubber was designed and the new muzzle nut had a smooth line in its middle to accept the new muzzle protector.
The aluminium barrel protector was also replaced with a bakelite (in the middle) then steel protector later in the war, this part is often lost or replaced on MP40s.

barrel protectors
top: MP38 with early muzzle nut and aluminium barrel protector.
middle: MP40 with new pattern muzzle nut and bakelite barrel protector.
bottom: MP40 with new pattern muzzle nut and steel barrel protector.

A new cheaper version of the telescope spring made of rolled sheet steel was introduced.


Now finally arrived to the MP40 we have in game.
The in-game model is marked as BNZ 41 so it was produced at Steyr (Austria) in late 1941, it also features a refitted ribbed magazine which was only introduced in March 1942, the MP38 in-game has the same magazine.

There are 3 in-game issues here:

  • The MP38 having less damage
  • The MP40 description is plain bad
  • Both in game MP38 and MP40 are from March 1942 at earliest

MP38 having less damage


I have gone over all changes between the MP38 and the MP40 we have in the game, and yet I could not find one thing to justify the damage difference.
I also don´t see any balancing concern against increasing MP38 damage.
The MP38 is too strong to be moved to BR1 and there is also no reason to nerf it down to BR1 because MP3008 is already available on BR1 anyway so we can rule out BR changes.

Give MP38 the same damage as MP40? (5.8 → 5.9 by default)
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

The MP40 description is plain bad


MP40 desc

Yep, that 0.1 kg difference is really noteworthy and the fire rate difference is not necessarily true in reality, it’s clear that the description is trying to justify the MP40 being better but it’s too lazy to be believable.

I wrote a new description which is more realistic and is more convincing that the MP40 is better:

MP40 was a German 9mm submachine gun produced by sheet metal stamping, its simple appearance is a prominent reflection of utilitarian style.
MP40 guns produced from 1942 feature war time improvements such as new telescope spring, improved safety, better magazines and a sturdier magazine catch with better grip.

Should the in-game description get replaced with this?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

Both in game MP38 and MP40 are from March 1942 at earliest


This is not really an official game issue since time traveling is now the accepted norm.
For the devs this is more of an opportunity to add an early production MP40, just please add it with a smooth magazine and add MP38 with smooth magazine to the editor as well for modders.

In-game the early MP40 would be nearly identical to the MP38 so adding it to Axis would be absolutely pointless, even as an event.
I originally did consider it as a potential Japanese event reward since Japan did purchase German panzers with all necessary equipment which included MP40 submachine guns (standard issue with all German armoured vehicles) however that purchase was in May 1943 thus we can completely rule out that Japan ever came into possession of early MP40 submachine guns.

The most realistic option is giving the early MP40 to the Soviet faction due to the staggering amounts they have captured.
During my time of research I found countless pictures of Soviets with captured early pattern MP40 submachine guns.

  • Axis is sitting on 3 variants of the Ppsh41 and the PPS-43.
  • MP38 like gun would be a very interesting but weaker alternative to Soviets than their PPS SMGs and the Axis MP40, thus incentivising the usage of their own SMGs but still presenting a 9mm gun to special roles like medic or APC driver.
pictures of trophy early pattern MP40s


mp40 early 2
mp40 early 3
MP40 early 4
MP40 early 5
MP40 early 6
MP40 early 7
Mp38 1
Soviet officers inspecting 2 MP38 and 1 MP40 SMGs, Im not 100% if its early MP40 though.

Closed. It was a dumb idea even from me.

Should early MP40 get added?
  • Yes to Soviets
  • Yes, but NOT to Soviets
  • No
0 voters
If yes, what should its name be?
  • MP40 (early)
  • Schmeisser MP40 (as it was often called by soldiers that captured them)
0 voters
Sources

https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30029268
MP40 | Die Maschinenpistole MP38, MP40, MP41
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdQhO8FtY7c&t=1s

Thank you for your time and attention!

2 Likes

There is nothing wrong with calling a MP38 or MP40 “Schmeisser” - copied from the website MP40 - best source for the MP40 submachine gun

Every book written after the early fifties claims that Hugo Schmeisser had nothing to do with the MP40. Most authors base their information on earlier works, without verifying the patents or interviewing individuals involved in the design and production at the time. While I don’t claim to have done this, further investigation and correspondence with experts in small arms, who possess first-hand information, lead me to believe that the statement, “Hugo and Hans Schmeisser had nothing to do with the design,” is a misunderstanding.

The main reason for this misconception likely stems from Erma’s desire to do business in the United States after WWII. American sport shooters represented a lucrative market. During this period, Erma came into contact with “Interarmco Ltd.” based in the U.S. Given the notorious reputation of the MP40 during the war, Erma wanted to impress their prospective business partner. They simply “forgot” to mention that much of the design was based on Hugo Schmeisser’s patents. This was easy to omit since Hugo Schmeisser passed away around this time, shortly after returning from a long period of Soviet captivity.

Another factor contributing to this oversight was that the influential “Small Arms” series of books claimed that Hugo Schmeisser’s only role was through Haenel, which also produced the MP38 and MP40. Schmeisser was the technical director at Haenel. A tricky detail is that the author of the “Small Arms” series was a friend of the owner of Interarmco Ltd., the same company with a deal with Erma.

Immediately after the war, even before the Soviets occupied their part of Germany, the British Intelligence Service interviewed Hugo Schmeisser. In these intelligence reports, Schmeisser stated that he was responsible for all the submachine guns used by the military. These statements were examined and confirmed by high-ranking officers involved in the armament industry.

1 Like

mp40 to soviets and then a directly captured ppsh box (not 9mm… which i’m preparing for inherent distaste) for germany… sure.

As from what i’m looking at it seems there wasn’t nearly as much mp 40s documented to be captured by soviets compared to germans with the ppsh.

Im not really sure why Axis would need to bother with that when they could get Soumi SMGs instead.

Yes, because Soviets produced way more ppsh.

1 Like

I would prefer this… however it seems they are allergic to that and giving germanys most iconic smg to soviets i think its fair it goes both ways.

Although… a steady fire rate smg seems to be non existent in the soviet tree when you compare them to grease gun, mp 40 and mp 28 for japan

Yknow now looking at it i guess thats what the uragan was :joy:

Seems quite… “Wordy”…? Have you considered making it simpler…?

Something along the lines of:

“The MP 40 was a wartime simplification of the MP 38, utilizing simpler sheet metal stamping manufacturing. Despite being simpler to manufacture, it did also include many improvements on the design compared to the original the MP 38.”

Or, even simpler:

“The MP 40 was a wartime simplified and improved design over the MP 38, utilizing simpler sheet metal stamping manufacturing and featuring a improved bolt-safety and a sturdier magazine catch.”

…?


I’m not a huge fan of captured weaponry, as you’re probably aware off…

I’ll just… Quietly ignore this one if you don’t mind…?
im-gonna-pretend-i-didnt-see-that-meme

Would be appreciative if you quietly ignored my ignoring as well.

Now you are starting to see why I suggested the MP40 (early).
Well Im not saying there aren’t other SMGs they could get, but its certainly the most historically accurate one.

1 Like

So many people are ignoring that part of my suggestion that I might just close the poll myself at this point :smiling_face_with_tear:

1 Like

Okay MP40 (early) as a new gun part of the suggestion is now closed.

1 Like

I feel a lot of pity over this… My condolences, even if I disliked the idea itself…

I wouldn’t mind a MP 40 early model to be added, though… Maybe for the current Soviet Premium squad…?

I sometimes call MG 42s and 34s collectively as “Spandau” (just not here on the forums, because no one would understand me), just because Allied (or at least British) troops used to call them that at the time.

It’s not technically correct at all, but I have always been flexible when it comes to firearms terminology, because as anyone with any kind of experience will tell you, it’s not as simple as someone might think it is…

For example: My grandpa, a career officer within the Swedish Army (specificly within the artillery) for the entierty of his working life, sometimes refered to the 40mm Bofors AA gun as a “machine gun”… I’m not going to argue against a man who worked with the weapon for the better part of four decades (might be longer, I’d have to re-check his records)…

1 Like

Sorry my autistic ass only paid attention to make sure that every word is terminologically correct, though the safety features are actually not necessary I guess.

1 Like

Nah, I will just suggest another gun instead. Its not that deep that at all.

1 Like

Obviously hours and hours of research the dev’s put in on the MP 40. :wink: Looks to me like they just did a quick google search on the MP40 and wrote the first thing they saw. :rofl:
image

3 Likes