Is this a repeat of previous topic
@Forum-Moderator
Can you guys just answer does some rules here working?
If we going to force the same polls every time we don’t like a previous results, that the point of it all?
@Bigote0070 tell me, am I wrong
@Bigote0070 tell me, am I wrong
Your 2 examples aren’t bias 
paratroopers aren’t even relevant anymore and are only event/premium anyway.
I can also tell you are wrong.
This is regarding soviet bodyarmor only. Remove entirely / keep it in event / premium squads.
While the previous had option regarding every cosmetic.
1 Like
Flooding a poll on a closed topic is not proof of anything.
3 Likes
I think a majority of players liked the previous results, seeing as a majority (61%) was in favor of removing body armor in the previous poll. The issue, is that a majority of players have consistently voted they want (soviet)body armor nerfed in some way, yet there has been no acknowledgment from official sources as to why this is not possible
5 Likes
The topic is closed, which means it open to be suggested again, because there are no other a tive duplicates around. No forum rules are being broken.
3 Likes
Well, there is sources that’s body armor resist 100% bullets from some distance - you want that?
There is also sources of AVT being so crap that even soviets canceled it.
So the historical accuracy doesnt exactly apply there due to sake of gameplay.
Same historical accuracy doesnt have to apply here either, due to sake of gameplay.
Pretty simple.
3 Likes
So, historical accuracy doesn’t mean nothing then you don’t want something - say it clear
1 Like
This is so disgustingly disingenuous. Just say outright you want the topic closed because you don’t like the poll results
It’s a revisit. Devs said they don’t want to make changes as a ‘knee-jerk reaction’ and would rather see how the situation develops. I’ve waited for more than 2 weeks since the Manchuria update was introduced before making this post and a poll again so that devs can see that there’s no knee-jerking going on and people genuinely do not want body armor to give -10% reduction
Also:
it’s 61:39 for removal of body armor effects one way or another. I like those results because they are in favor of my cause
Trying to get this topic closed is pathetic
8 Likes
“No” there is most popular answer, please don’t lie to people and stop make the same polls
I got documents there body armor holds a bullets.
It doesnt. And you know it too, only time you use this silly scapegoat argument is when it supports your bias.
I think I did vote removal of soviet bodyarmor.
Ah yes, I remember those dockqments of www.historiprowessionaligornotatallbiased.com
1 Like
I have some memories which told - Germans had some body armor as well. Not much but something
1 Like
Could you kindly remove this one certain invidual throwing insults here & trying to derail topic.
We’re having civilized discussion here.
5 Likes
Oh yes, some guy who mention - here very the same poll, who bring a documents about body armor holds a bullets.
Actualy some who have opposite point of view - give more content in a game - bd for everybody. What’s quite obvious 
1 Like
It’s the biggest piece of cope I’ve seen
Oh yes, that’s the reason why you immediately voted no before typing a singular thing
Repeating the same incorrect things like a broken record while spamming emojis. What a ragebait, incredible. At least you in your own mind are having fun because no one else really treats you seriously.
What’s even more pathetic that this demeanor is painfully obvious just cope. You are fighting tooth and nail for your little crutch, hiding behind self righteous claims pulled out of nowhere and a mask of seemingly being unbothered. Yet the nails are bleeding and tears swell up in your eyes as people just clown on you
Your devotion to protect it would be commendable had not for the stubborness in remaining ignorant and delusion of self-righteousness
Literally the biggest cope comes from your side and you had nothing to support anything you’ve been saying. And no matter how much you lie to yourself that you are somehow ‘ragebaiting us’, ‘working with logic’ or that ‘You don’t care’ - it’s not going to trick anyone except you.
5 Likes
Meanwhile, the Russian dude:“SHUT DOWN THE POST!”
4 Likes
If we will making very the same poll per week, that is it for anyway?
Where is the ‘buff damage resistance’ option?
2 Likes
Your documents were quite “intresting”
I believe @Veekay45 ? Got extremely different translation out of the said documents compared to what you got.
Well your opposed point of view is based on rather questionable “Historical accuracy” which you are requesting only when it does support your biased needs.
I dont recall you requesting nerf towards AVS in name of historical accuracy, quite contrary If I recall you were moaning a buff to it because 15 rounds vs 20 wasnt “fair”.
So its fair to come to conclusion you only care of historical accuracy if it benefits you ingame.
Thus, entirely irrelevant.
Sure, why not.
4 Likes