Body armor issue - a revisit

Also, when it doesn’t matter you should shut up and let the grown ups discuss bodyarmor.

2 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

To be honest, I’m fine with Google as a source. Too many people discard it, but there are not a lot of actual WW2 technical documents floating around the internet from what I can see.

Me personally, I think Gaijin should just remove body armor altogether since it just creates an unneeded firestorm amongst players.

7 Likes

Well its the most obvious balance issue of the game that hasnt been adressed for years. The only correct thing to do is exactly that.

Not that it matters to you, since you use BR1 weapons exclusively in BR5.

1 Like

Then you all frenzy into a tantrum storm when someone disagrees and says your tears are irrelevant :rofl: it’s embarrassing

You should see my Volkssturm lineup then :wink:

Listen, I am fed up with the dishonesty and hypocrisy of you and the others defending this blatant bias.

In other words, what you call childish tantrum is actually pure disgust.

4 Likes

Pure disgust over a video game :rofl: pathetic, the fact that you all get so worked up and have convinced yourselves that it’s such an injustice and hide behind it as an excuse for losing is hilarious. Yet you’ll happily sit in a Tiger 2 H and dominate Soviet tanks or wipe whole teams with US aircraft shows how hypocritical you all are.

Affects quite alot. Sovjets get higher ROF and GE gets higher DMG, only the soviets can nullify the GE’s higher dmg.
Its a proven problem already on paper in absolute best conditions.
The issue ingame is obviously a much bigger since no one has 100% accuracy.

And what arguably is one of the major issues here is that one faction enjoys such hidden buffs.

You dont need to contribute it.

Well so was GE only faction that deployed assault rifles.
But again, for some oddity reason the soviets just had to get fedorov & ak47.

I believe neckshot has higher multiplier, just incase if you want to go full ass.

BR5 / bodyarmor all BR’s.
And if I recall the soviets has loaned quite a chunk of AT capability from GE, to deal with this absolute injust.
Yet, GE havent got same treatment.

Not sure, but 99% sure that soviets doesnt fight the murricans.

7 Likes

I was literally the first one on this forum that was veeeery vocal about NOT adding Tiger II H.

Learn to read, its pure disgust over you specifically, not the game.

cause factions are already pretty much symmetrical?

yeah pretty even bonuses… swords are really not that useful(and every faction has them, with veterans being able to equip couple of squads in every faction), “best” tanks are on 1 or maybe 2 BR with other factions having tanks with similar performance. US only gets insane payloads with p47, while body armor is useful on every BR.

btw dont soviet already have advantage in best SMG/AR across all tiers? why do they need extra advantage in body armor?

10 Likes

There is no logical reason for 1 faction to have a clear and distinct artificial advantage over all others in an arcade style game, separate from faction-specific weaponry/vehicles. Either let all factions equip body armor, or no one should get body armor. (In my personal opinion, cosmetics should not affect gameplay in any way!)

The soviet bias consistently and repeatedly displayed by the developers has become tiresome. Body armor & paratroopers that can change weapons are the most egregious examples, but I’m sure more knowledgeable players can list other examples.

10 Likes

I can read fine champ, it’s you who can’t type properly :rofl: if you have pure disgust over someone who has a different opinion than yours then you need therapy. Try some yoga instead of crying on forums

Soviet bias is a myth, stop using excuses for skill issues.

Ah yes the KT2 makes up everything.

3 Likes

Enlisted devs, like the gaijin devs, tend to balance things based on performance of the average player, not the ideal.

1 Like

Guys, it’s over. He has both admited that he supposedly doesn’t care, and that he is intentionally choosing to stay ignorant. There is no reasoning with him.

There is no point arguing any further, the points have been made, he’d rather throw insults than take the time to understand them. And what’s more, he’s proud of doing so, there is no chance for a sensible debate with such a character.

Just ignore the obvious troll.

10 Likes

Remember, you clearly don’t care if you repeatedly show up to tell us that. After all, it is: Tell, do not show!

9 Likes

There never was - the ONLY argument these monkey’s keep bringing up is that it doesn’t matter.

Like, how can someone be so stupid to believe this is a logical conclusion. This entire statement is 100% illogical.

When it doesn’t matter, why are you defending it?

In other words he knows very well that he is wrong, but he has no better argument to defend his unfair advantage.

Actually… I hear “Japanese have swords” also quite often, which is ridiculous and I wont even argue about this, but the whole “Germany has better tanks” argument… everyone knows this is nonsense. As if Tiger II H is more unfair than KV1.

USSR will get something like Superpershing eventually to counter Tiger IIH, but I start to feel like KV1 will never be adressed.

4 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.