Body armor issue - a revisit

Fair point, and if the devs remove it then so be it. I just think it’s hilarious that you all cry and act like body armour is the boogeyman and that it’s this game breaking bug. The amount of crying done on literally every community post is embarrassing.

where option to make it stronger so that axis mains seethe more?

1 Like

obraz
‘Only 114ms’ is 57.5% of my reaction time

And this is only bit above average human being

Still havent clicked a single link yet I see

Truly an incredible specimen. Your average body armor enjoyer should really be studied bacause the cope and seethe is just unimaginable. Even funnier is throwing ‘it doesnt matter’ and ‘its not noticable’ but fight with tooth and nail to keep it, excusing it with ‘body armor removal spam being annoying’

You people aint fooling anyone anymore

5 Likes

Double HP is not tiny.

1 Like

If you look at the names that vote no you may see a pattern……

Not interested in clicking your weird links :rofl: your reaction time means nothing to me either. Funny how you’re telling me to cope when you’re the one crying in a post and making excuses. Stop projecting :clown_face:

Double HP in a game where the TTK is extremely fast means nothing.

I’ll like to say that I won’t mind if the damage reduction is removed all together, however soviet mains (as we see) would complain about it, so keeping it for the assault engineers squad would probably be the comprise.

2 Likes

Oh no the Russian lobby is persecuting poor Germany players NOOOOO

I’m an American main buddy l….

2 Likes

I have the same opinion as I have every time Body armor is brought up. Either “EVERY” faction should have body armor, or “NO” faction should have body armor.

Since “EVERY” faction had body armor, it is either extreme bias on Gaijin’s part to “ONLY” allow “ONE” faction to use it, or extreme “STUPIDITY” on Gaijin’s part. I think players can make their own determination on that.

I wonder what historical document told Gaijin that only the Soviets had access to body armor? :thinking:

3 Likes

It’s a known fact that the Soviets employed body armour more than any other country in WW2. So there’s your answer to your question that you could have just googled….

1 Like

Irrelevant, “every faction had body armor”, thus every faction had the choice to use it. It doesn’t matter who used it the most :wink:

The US used shotguns far more then any other faction, so, shouldn’t the US be the only faction to have Shotguns?

BTW, since when did Google become the official source of Enlisted? Every time someone quotes it as their source they seem to be scoffed at. :rofl:

2 Likes

I will be saying it every time I see the body armor posts, they are not a problem, the problem are disgusting players who equip it for every soldier available. The use of any stat buffing cosmetics should be limited to prevent mass use

1 Like

Tell that G41, where one more bullet to kill effectively translates into double the reloads for the same kills.

5 Likes

Never said it wasn’t used by other factions…… I said it was employed by the Soviets the most. I’m all for other factions getting it but I’d rather it be as premium/event squads due to how rare it was for other factions.

Google/the internet has become the official source for everything. It’s literally an archive for everything so no clue why you’re trying to act like a smart a**

1 Like

Also I completely disagree, one extra bullet to kill makes the difference between a BR2 SMG and a BR5 AR.

1 Like

You’re entitled to disagree, I disagreed that it matters when you can just fire a follow up shot or aim for the head.

Just aim for the head, yeah you are right, I will now only play with pistols - why havent I thought about this… I totally dont need primaries, I’ll just headshot everything.

Thank you for your wise comment.

3 Likes

Can’t believe you’re only learning now that a headshot does more damage than a chest/body shot :thinking:
You’re welcome