They could make like unlikable bot or bunker (depends on map) that protect grey zone kinda like carrier in pacific Imo would make it a bit more realistic maybe?
Eh idk tbh grey zone discussion are hard for me
nah grey zones are there to prevent spawn camping.
personally i dont care about grey zone cause infantry wasnt killing tanks with explosion packs(non existent) or satchel charges(they killed/disabled very small minority of all tanks). infantry weapon of choice for destroying tanks was either AT gun, rocket launcher (bazooka, panzerfaust etc.), AT rifle (for early war) or AT mines(minefields for defense).
please tell me how many tanks were destroyed by infantry charging into tank with explosion pack and how many of them were destroyed by range AT weapons.
but you do. infantry cant build AA on whole map and it can only see planes in 1000m range.
you can fight that plane same as if there was enemy tank up. enemy tank could destroy you, same as you could destroy enemy tank. same thing with planes.
1 Like
I can destroy the tank with my dive bomber…if I get the chance since I usually only get ONE PASS! I don’t get the protections that a Tank gets as their is no portion of the sky that I can lurk around in where an enemy fighter cannot pursuit me, that’s the point! That is why NO ONE needs a grey zone. 
If I am using my APC as a tank, why do I NOT get protection with it? The German APC with a howitzer is very good being used as a tank, if you have time to sit and blast away since you have no protection
People only care about what they like, so if you love fighting in your tanks, you love the grey zone, but if you don’t fly in a plane, they you could care less about any ariel protection, or APC protection if being used as a tank. I don’t use a tank, thus I don’t care about unrealistic tank protection. Do I really think dive bombers need a grey zone? NO, but they have as much right to one as a tank. BTW, I have shot down a plane with my APC once, so you can drop planes with your tank as well. 
such BS statement. tanks only get protection from det pack. not from AT guns, rocket launchers, other tanks or planes. last time i checked infantry cant get to sky to det pack plane, but i dont see you complaining…
btw i am infantry main and usually mostly play with planes when i do vehicle. although i play with tanks sometimes.
2 Likes
I don’t like the tanks, I think they are boring, and until a few months ago had never flown a plane other then practice. My one and only APC kill on a plane was a freak lucky shot which I am sure will never happen again. Not often does a plane dive down right in front of your howitzer without having to move it so all I had to do was click the mouse. 
I take absolutely no credit for talent with that shot. I enjoy the plane as it is far less stressful then constant infantry fighting, however, it is aggravating to have to wait for a plane to become available, and get killed after your first pass. But if their are no fighters flying and it is mostly an outdoor map with houses I can get 40 or 50 kills along with killing Tank occupants using my Stuka. It took a while to get the timing, but once I got that down the rest took care of itself. I’m not good at dog fighting, and get my butt kicked in my P51 as it doesn’t last long in level 5.
well you should have seen someone taking down plane with mortar shell…
2 Likes
Btw this got derail quite a bit might wanna get back on track
Ironic since train don’t exist anymore lol
1 Like
lol nerf det pack pls
pay to win weapon is nerf and pay to win abuser deserve be stopped!!
the only pay to win aspect about this gun is it being a trooper weapon.
According to your clan member, the weapon is going to be even better after this change…
So I really don’t understand what’s your problem. I am honestly confused.
when enlisted remove pay to win gun like gewehr 41 kurz with nerf, its good for game
As I have already said, your clan mate is happy for this change. That’s according to him, is going to make the weapon even better.
Whatever, you don’t even know the name of the weapon…
1 Like
How easy to offend you…
This weapon wasn’t pay locked…
Offend?
The backlash to the G43k change isnt entirely because it is percieved as a nerf but also because buyers are disturbed by that decision to change it.
In this case game health is entirelly irrelevant and trust that DF wont backstab their purchases matters only.
If DF just ignores this issue it might result in less money being spend on the game by those who can afford it but dont want to fully commit to something (this expansive) that might be changed in the future due to a lack of trust.
This is the reality that DF has to navigate (while somehow financing servers and staff).
2 Likes
It was not entirely pay locked sure, but you could also direcly spend gold for it and a lot of GO that where redeemed where aquired through the paid BP.
It’s so p2w that i always put them on 5th-6th position in my squads
You are acting like you know everything and are most skilled player in “most powerful clan in Enlisted” but in reality you don’t know that there are other ways of obtaining gold order weapons than just paying with gold.
1 Like
You could pay money to skip the grind for M2 Stinger, so according to both of you it’s also p2w weapon. Your logic doesn’t make any sense. There are many ways of acquiring gold order weapons for free.
1 Like