I routinely have games that i stop and have more than 800 tickets… don’t try to make it about the maps because you or the enemy team is just bad.
Unrelated, but just wanted to post because I thought it was neat, but had a game yesterday where we took the first three objectives without a single squad loss on the entire team, I was ashamed to be the first to lose a squad (I think) due to a bomb drop.
But more on point now, yes it does happen due to a multitude of factors, however ill fitting maps for higher BR’s will only exacerbate the issue.
finally! I’ve been waiting for this moment for so long! I hope it stays like this after the test phase!
many thanks in advance.
If there is no map selection system as a supplement in the future, I will definitely oppose this test because we are currently losing the way to select maps by adjusting BR, and it is the only one.
In addition, regarding the issue of maps, in most maps of Moscow and Tunisia, high BR machine guns and rifles can kill AI soldiers faster in open areas, which is quite bad for infantry players.
I hope you remember that while updating Tunisia, we also received smoke shelling, and the smoke at that time was completely different from now.Due to modifications made after the smoke, any map with a wide open area will only have tanks and planes to enjoy, which is terrible.
Enhance smoke or modify the map, otherwise Tunisia is definitely not suitable for high BR.
3 Likes
This whole situation has clearly just snowballed beyond what anyone expected; there are people literally comparing how many posts they have read in the forum for clout in an argument. The players most engaging with the actual intent of this test can’t even really agree on anything.
Could you guys please, just ask the devs to make a statement on the intended direction of the game. A single sentence would put an end to almost all of this vitriol.
1 Like
All they have to do is give map customization with ALL MAPS AND ALL BR AND LET PEOPLE DECIDE WHAT THEY WANT TO PLAY NOT WHAT PEOPLE ARE FORCED TO PLAY EASY SOLUTION… BUT IT IS ENLISTED SO THEY WILL NOT MAKE A STATEMENT THERE PHILOSOPHY IS DONT ENGAGE IT WILL BLOW OVER THEN WE WILL BE ON THE NEXT POST…
IT SUCKS I KNOW BUT HERES A PORTRAIT FOR YOUR TROUBLES…
3 Likes
I’m not sure if current player numbers would reasonably allow for that solution. I wish they would give more wait time data etc, if memory serves, they have only made some few comments on the topic, but no concrete numbers.
I finally set aside some time to go back over this post, and the Major’s original posting. The two of you are in-fact stating two very different things, and both of you seem to be very certain in what you are saying. This makes it very difficult for players to discuss (argue over) the topic, let alone understand it at all. In the future, please communicate your intentions clearly.
Briefly skimming through all the official posts, it is still not clear which of you was correctly communicating Dark Flow’s intentions.
I KNOW there wont be enough playerbase so they need to make to AI SMART and competitive to fill the void of a lower playerbase… I been playing since beta and can say this game is a fraction of what it used to be. Out of everything the playerbase wants and ask for we have gotton maybe 20 thing out of 1000s of request granted some are unrealistic or make no since but sincerely 20 out of 1000s of ideas is just a slap in the face it seems the more we want something we get the opposite we want better events more weapons a chance at legacy squads ect. But instead we are givin boosters and a portrait like really enlisted this is the best you can come up with? its like they want us all to stop playing so they can shut the game down and move on to improving War Thunder I ve given this game my all praised it to whoever will listen then to be rewarded with boosters and a portrait is just lazy and a hard pill to swallow but again like everyone else I come in here try to voice my concerns to deaf ears and hope this game will shine again like the glory days of enlisted. We will have to wait for War Thunder to dedicate a team to actually care for this game and give it there love and passion that has been lost a long time ago.
Maybe on the next event if we ALL ask for boosters and a portrait we will actually get some squads or something really good.
1 Like
Others respond as if they were preaching the future, that is another problem.
I’m afraid one isn’t enough…
Does that mean you want to activate it permanently?
But it only became that way after the last major update.
Before that, it wasn’t as pronounced or balanced.
more Maps mean more Customization options for my Squads(Berlin) , meanwhile i have custom the uniforms only for low BR-Maps…
Thats moar Moneh which CoMmUnItY could spend.
Berlin for BR1-5 !!!
This means that maps in East Prussia and Hungary, such as the Lake Balaton Offensive or the Soviet Invasion of Manchuria, are needed to increase the variety. Both are towards the end of the war and perfect for BR5. Incidentally, the Invasion of Manchuria would add even more variety.
By the way, this problem has only existed since the introduction of the awesome Battle Rating. 
I think it’s the wrong approach to punish 90% of players; it’s a gap that can actually be closed bit by bit.
Make Enlisted great again! Not to junk!
They release like two new map presents per year so how long should we wait? Five years?
Not really 90% but sure.
It may be that they want to reduce effort here to save costs.
But that’s sawing off the branch they’re sitting on by giving up their unique selling points and trying to enter the mass market, from which there’s no way back.
And Enlisted is clearly at a disadvantage here, and this will increase cost pressure even further.
The goal must be to elevate the brand in order to become independent from the rest of the market and position themselves with a unique selling point. That’s why Enlisted has made it this far.
If they give up on that, the game will be gone in three to four years.
At the very latest, when new games with better graphics come out. Then there’s no reason to play Enlisted anymore if the historical relevance is lost.
There are currently enough games, including AAAA titles, that show what happens when you streamline them. They quickly disappear from the market and are not accepted by players.
1 Like
Unique selling points rn are bot squad system and TT. The campaigns didnt work.
Lost for four years now.
Merge increased numbers but whatever.
Do you really think so? I see it the other way around.
Precisely because the bots aren’t perfect, even less skilled players get a sense of achievement by scoring a few kills. And that rewards them.
So I see that as a huge plus in terms of easier accessibility.
Sure, for a better player, they’re annoying.
In my eyes, the unique selling points are quite clear: the interaction of the weapon types, damage models, vehicles with historical armor values, and no HP bar depletion, maps of original battlefields, the mix of arcade and tactical gameplay and also simulation, the squads and their configuration, etc…
There’s a lot. And precisely because Enlisted started out NOT wanting to serve the casual market, to attract those players who simply don’t want to play BF5 or CoD.
For a long time, the game gave me the feeling of being able to play one of the historical battles of the time. Now, unfortunately, that’s lost. 
Why play a WW2 game? To experience WW2!
3 Likes