Ah yes, the good old “dont like it dont buy it” strategy. Lets see how well that works for this game
3 Likes
I dont. I took a break recently. But I come back and see this bullshit “test”. Ive supported the game a lot. I have a job and a family so I cant sink hudreds of hours a week into this game but i was willing to put up with that by buying premium time and sometimes buying out events. I love the game and it has the potential to be so much better but the recent decisions by the devs have been horrible!
3 Likes
That’s not what I have said.
You don’t seem to have any relevant argument. Apart from a few completely generic pseudo phrases.
1 Like
I don’t know about Tunisia, but other than that I think it’s mostly a good idea. I definitely want Berlin for BR 1-3 personally.
4 Likes
Repevant argument for what? You calling him a troll?
You didnt present any arguments either. It used to be a feature of this game that you could choose your maps now you cant. Its not his fault. The campaign system used to be a draw for the game. The merger was a good thing but it doesnt make anything of what I said untrue or invalid
2 Likes
And Major McDonald…PLEASE get the developers to keep the special Silver Victory Chests year round, it’s the only way of getting older event squads and the pull rates are BRUTAL on those things. I just spent 800,000 on the last shop only to get one squad…at least keep the option to waste good silver.
1 Like
I did, lol. 
But I am not going to argue with you over nothing. Especially not in News topic.
I loooooove tunisia
2 Likes
I routinely have games that i stop and have more than 800 tickets… don’t try to make it about the maps because you or the enemy team is just bad.
Unrelated, but just wanted to post because I thought it was neat, but had a game yesterday where we took the first three objectives without a single squad loss on the entire team, I was ashamed to be the first to lose a squad (I think) due to a bomb drop.
But more on point now, yes it does happen due to a multitude of factors, however ill fitting maps for higher BR’s will only exacerbate the issue.
finally! I’ve been waiting for this moment for so long! I hope it stays like this after the test phase!
many thanks in advance.
If there is no map selection system as a supplement in the future, I will definitely oppose this test because we are currently losing the way to select maps by adjusting BR, and it is the only one.
In addition, regarding the issue of maps, in most maps of Moscow and Tunisia, high BR machine guns and rifles can kill AI soldiers faster in open areas, which is quite bad for infantry players.
I hope you remember that while updating Tunisia, we also received smoke shelling, and the smoke at that time was completely different from now.Due to modifications made after the smoke, any map with a wide open area will only have tanks and planes to enjoy, which is terrible.
Enhance smoke or modify the map, otherwise Tunisia is definitely not suitable for high BR.
5 Likes
This whole situation has clearly just snowballed beyond what anyone expected; there are people literally comparing how many posts they have read in the forum for clout in an argument. The players most engaging with the actual intent of this test can’t even really agree on anything.
Could you guys please, just ask the devs to make a statement on the intended direction of the game. A single sentence would put an end to almost all of this vitriol.
2 Likes
All they have to do is give map customization with ALL MAPS AND ALL BR AND LET PEOPLE DECIDE WHAT THEY WANT TO PLAY NOT WHAT PEOPLE ARE FORCED TO PLAY EASY SOLUTION… BUT IT IS ENLISTED SO THEY WILL NOT MAKE A STATEMENT THERE PHILOSOPHY IS DONT ENGAGE IT WILL BLOW OVER THEN WE WILL BE ON THE NEXT POST…
IT SUCKS I KNOW BUT HERES A PORTRAIT FOR YOUR TROUBLES…
3 Likes
I’m not sure if current player numbers would reasonably allow for that solution. I wish they would give more wait time data etc, if memory serves, they have only made some few comments on the topic, but no concrete numbers.
I finally set aside some time to go back over this post, and the Major’s original posting. The two of you are in-fact stating two very different things, and both of you seem to be very certain in what you are saying. This makes it very difficult for players to discuss (argue over) the topic, let alone understand it at all. In the future, please communicate your intentions clearly.
Briefly skimming through all the official posts, it is still not clear which of you was correctly communicating Dark Flow’s intentions.
I KNOW there wont be enough playerbase so they need to make to AI SMART and competitive to fill the void of a lower playerbase… I been playing since beta and can say this game is a fraction of what it used to be. Out of everything the playerbase wants and ask for we have gotton maybe 20 thing out of 1000s of request granted some are unrealistic or make no since but sincerely 20 out of 1000s of ideas is just a slap in the face it seems the more we want something we get the opposite we want better events more weapons a chance at legacy squads ect. But instead we are givin boosters and a portrait like really enlisted this is the best you can come up with? its like they want us all to stop playing so they can shut the game down and move on to improving War Thunder I ve given this game my all praised it to whoever will listen then to be rewarded with boosters and a portrait is just lazy and a hard pill to swallow but again like everyone else I come in here try to voice my concerns to deaf ears and hope this game will shine again like the glory days of enlisted. We will have to wait for War Thunder to dedicate a team to actually care for this game and give it there love and passion that has been lost a long time ago.
Maybe on the next event if we ALL ask for boosters and a portrait we will actually get some squads or something really good.
2 Likes
Others respond as if they were preaching the future, that is another problem.
I’m afraid one isn’t enough…