But they had awful Alpine map with both teams running in circles. That one map with huge bridge in the middle was also very poorly designed. And i would rather take 5 cave maps than one Aerodrome what a crap map it was. You were just standing on respawn dying to the enemies spawn camping your spawn not a single way was safe enough to move from there.
BF markings are overpowered, and why would you want a rally far away from the combat?
Enlsited is a letâs take it again WW2 Squad based FPS.
thatâs what it was, is and should continue to be and not go down the wrong pathc of watering down and become another useless arcade CoD copy a la Fortninte
Evidence?
Because I only see the same five plebs over and over for like two years now.
According to robhir, game gew since they merged the campaigns. People who still join afterwards but think the game is supposed to be haunting ambitious/ historical accurate are morons who deny reality.
Dunno, at least my bias has numbers.
No, we should design an unfun and unbalanced game for like five people.
That is economic.
Dunno, I donât get numbers from you so I have to deal with your words and they ainât impressive.
I just look at the numbers. HLL is played by few people. Post Scriptum is played by even less. Enlisted is played by more. Battlefield V is played by more. And the big players like CoD and Rainbow 6 are played the most. And those games have very little to do with âaccuracyâ.
Just because YOU want something doesnât mean EVERYONE wants the same thing. You are not a good arbiter of what makes a game successful. The numbers prove that.
Iâm not a fan of historical accuracy, but this is an exaggeration, almost everything in BR5 is from the end of the war, I killed an IS 1944 with my panzerschreck (1943) in Moscow (1941-42) and then killed enemies who use AS44 (1944) with my G43 kurz (probably 1944) and STG 44 (44-43).
PLEASE let us keep these maps for ALL BRsâŠitâs awesome!! It adds so much for players getting bored with the same mapsâŠthose that want to argue the historical accuracy of low BR in Berlin, thatâs a moot point now that we have exerimental weapons and jets that never saw WWII action so the game can try and keep the factions balanced. PleaseâŠmore maps, itâs what keeps us happy!! Whereâs the Manchurian campaign?
I hope those who agree with this change will not complain about P47 and KT in Tunisia in the future.
Top 10 spiciest threads in forum history
I think, personally, that the game tries harder to be âaccurateâ than most. I also think that positively adds to the game. Iâm just saying that sacrificing good gameplay on the altar of âhistorical accuracyâ is foolish. What makes enlisted great is the squad system. Itâs unique and fun as hell. I like the ww2 setting because it has a classic feel. But Iâd take squads in everything from an Ancient Greece to modern setting just to get the mechanic. Reminds me of Tiger Knight. A game I desperately miss. (squads were better in Tiger Knight but Iâll take what i can get)
Donât talk shit and donât be rude opkay?
again donât talk shit there is alot of people who would come to the game if it had better represention of historical matchmaking and was grittier and had more realism. makein it less that it was is gionna helpl fck all. making it a more watered down CoD copy with Fortninte inspiration is not gonna make the game more interesting and poplular.
lastly you are boring pointless.
always same shit like the rest of you ehehu You want Historical! that doensât work! buhuhâŠ
fkcing really enough of you. useless and pointless.
Letâs hope your job is toilet cleaning for you inspiration creativity is downright SHIT
So many that I still donât get numbers from you to show them.
Evidence?
Dunno, the merge did according to the numbers of robhir.
Where are your numbers?
I am not boring.
You always say the same shit and I am too lazy to do the work for two.
I mean, I would also like to see the numbers of yours but sadly we do not get these numbers because you donât have them.
So we get to the typical âHistorical accuracy will work, trust me. The people are there⊠I just canât prove itâ.
Well, I would be unemployed if you would clean the toilet after you use it like every decent and civilized human. But I guess that ainât gonna happen.
was a nice read tho
Peak online in HLL during the distribution was ±10-15 thousand people. Now this mark is 5000, âextremely popularâ Enlisted - 5.800, and in the super-popular Battlefield 5 - 6000. That is, the difference between the âmaximum dead-end and dullâ HLL and the âmega-popular and super-interestingâ Battlefield is only 1000 people permanently online. And now we also remember the price category of these games: the minimum price for which you could buy HLL on discounts is 14.5 dollars, while Battlefield can be bought for a pitiful 1-2 dollars on discounts, in which it is almost constantly. As a result, we get HLL, which costs a lot of money by the standards of games, and which you can buy right away far from everyone, maintains a stable online of 5000 people, and battlefield, which in your words is âvery popular and successfulâ, and which only the lazy did not buy at a discount and which everyone can play - 6000. An impressive difference.
Steam numbers are not depicting all players.
Any ideas on how to find out the exact values? I donât have any
So, we are more popular than Battlefield?
Honestly Iâd rather see Tunisia at br4 at its highest. And maybe even Moscow being the same if not the same as now
Definitely not
Just Enlisted is free