This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Well for me personally it’s more important to not have time travelling stuff like Pz IV J in Moscow or Panther in Tunisia than having T-34 and Tiger 1 respectively.
Thanks! Appreciate it.
4 Likes
you might as well have been sent to battlefield during the testing phase so that you would “accept the grey reality of the game’s historical accuracy or just stop playing it”
1 Like
Is there any need for any further action?
can’t wait to get a guy riding a horse custom like in fortnite or even better a green alien with a Hawaiian shirt drinking a margarita doing emotes when you squad wipe a whole ai squad
1 Like
Or introduce heatings machine on handheld mgs
Eye patch very HA
the more I think about this change - the more I hate it. This would be devastating for the game.
5 Likes
Good change and about time. Just hope the developers don’t listen to the complainers too much on this one.
Ya Tiger 2 was never in Tunisia and I’m pretty sure no one could repair a tiger 2 transmission in less than 30 seconds either. Too much adherence to HA will make any game boring.
Your average non forum dwelling enlisted player will greatly appreciate this change.
5 Likes
Battlefield V has working bipods, animated bayonet charges, suppression, better maps, only overpriced camo you don’t need and a better spotting system… so…
2 Likes
So what’s the problem? You can send us to HLL, we can send you to Battlefield, and in the end, Enlisted will turn out to be of no use to anyone? Don’t you think that’s not a solution?
1 Like
I’m waiting for the amphibious assault on Normandy with Snoop Dogg.
2 Likes
How about get the useless Kids who want to play CoD and Fortninte out of here.
For me I want the game to make movement and gun handling more realistic and grittier.
and that BR take Year and Role into account.
i want more realism nad historical immersion.
Not less, no Fortninte, no Potman skins and MadMax.
I don’t want completely unhistorical map/gear matches
It’s a WW2 Squad based FPS. take it from there and center around that.
I’ve had enough listening to you idiots shout blabha HA is nonsense! It doesn’t Work, no one play that, ehhh.
How about F you mkay?
Play Fortnite.
AS for Enlisted You CAN make the game realistic, have more fair respresentation of Historical authenthic WW2 matches without making it boring. it’s entirely possible.
Devs are just lazy and you nayssayers are just dumb, intelligence wise just dumb and creatively barren.
3 Likes
Dunno.
Enlisted attracts arcade plebs, not historical reenactors, you just dodge that part by pointing fingers like a child.
Enlisted already appeals to one target group and that is not you.
1 Like
I wouldn’t got that far. And suppression was pretty annoying and snipers are even more useless in that game than in Enlisted.
TTS is way too high in beta and shortly after release it was perfect but then they made it too long and unfun to play which is still to this day, all guns feel weak to shoot and even tanks feel weak vs infantry.
As much as people complain about weak mgs/inconsistent HE at least they can murder multiple people in quick succession while in BF5 they just tickle enemies.
They didnt have cave map and D-Day map. That is already a plus.
At least they mark and sometimes build rallies while snipers in Enlisted do nothing what other classes can’t do.
No it doesn. It attracted WW2 Nerds and people interesed in Military History and Weapons/Vehicles.
Most from WT.
Your BS about the Fortnite idiots is just the useless ‘‘bots’’ of the Matches that suck at the game and pays for fck all.
The leeches.
And we should not go design wise to cater to those pontless kids
4 Likes
Oh my. People are STILL talking about HA as if it is at all relevant? This game is WW2 FLAVORED, that’s basically it. And, frankly, it’s all it should ever try and do. “Historical Accuracy” in a ww2 shooter is stupid. The most popular shooter games have nothing to do with “accuracy” at all.
Basically, it’s plenty “accurate” enough. If you want “Historical Accuracy” this was never the game for that. Why? Because, accuracy, and good gameplay are not the same thing. I mean Enlisted now has more players on STEAM than HLL does.
1 Like
However, I do not see any obvious success after such a decision. Where are the crowds of fans? Where is the increase in online? Where is the success of the project? Do you see it? I do not see it. I see two warring camps, and I see a short rise in online after the unification of the campaigns, and the absence of its further growth. Some are pulling the game in f2p battlefield, but would you yourself change Battlefield to Enlisted? Answer this question for yourself. You are trying to follow the path of maximum resistance, competing with games created by titans of the gaming industry. But are you sure that the Latvian company will be able to compete with Electronic Arts? I do not think so. If the project has a future, it is clearly not competition with Battlefield.
2 Likes