Testing expanded BR for maps

the more I think about this change - the more I hate it. This would be devastating for the game.

5 Likes

Good change and about time. Just hope the developers don’t listen to the complainers too much on this one.

Ya Tiger 2 was never in Tunisia and I’m pretty sure no one could repair a tiger 2 transmission in less than 30 seconds either. Too much adherence to HA will make any game boring.

Your average non forum dwelling enlisted player will greatly appreciate this change.

5 Likes

Battlefield V has working bipods, animated bayonet charges, suppression, better maps, only overpriced camo you don’t need and a better spotting system… so…
oh-no-anyway

2 Likes

So what’s the problem? You can send us to HLL, we can send you to Battlefield, and in the end, Enlisted will turn out to be of no use to anyone? Don’t you think that’s not a solution?

1 Like

I’m waiting for the amphibious assault on Normandy with Snoop Dogg.

2 Likes

How about get the useless Kids who want to play CoD and Fortninte out of here.
For me I want the game to make movement and gun handling more realistic and grittier.
and that BR take Year and Role into account.
i want more realism nad historical immersion.
Not less, no Fortninte, no Potman skins and MadMax.
I don’t want completely unhistorical map/gear matches

It’s a WW2 Squad based FPS. take it from there and center around that.
I’ve had enough listening to you idiots shout blabha HA is nonsense! It doesn’t Work, no one play that, ehhh.
How about F you mkay?
Play Fortnite.
AS for Enlisted You CAN make the game realistic, have more fair respresentation of Historical authenthic WW2 matches without making it boring. it’s entirely possible.
Devs are just lazy and you nayssayers are just dumb, intelligence wise just dumb and creatively barren.

3 Likes

Dunno.
Enlisted attracts arcade plebs, not historical reenactors, you just dodge that part by pointing fingers like a child.

Enlisted already appeals to one target group and that is not you.

1 Like

I wouldn’t got that far. And suppression was pretty annoying and snipers are even more useless in that game than in Enlisted.

TTS is way too high in beta and shortly after release it was perfect but then they made it too long and unfun to play which is still to this day, all guns feel weak to shoot and even tanks feel weak vs infantry.

As much as people complain about weak mgs/inconsistent HE at least they can murder multiple people in quick succession while in BF5 they just tickle enemies.

They didnt have cave map and D-Day map. That is already a plus.

At least they mark and sometimes build rallies while snipers in Enlisted do nothing what other classes can’t do.

No it doesn. It attracted WW2 Nerds and people interesed in Military History and Weapons/Vehicles.
Most from WT.
Your BS about the Fortnite idiots is just the useless ‘‘bots’’ of the Matches that suck at the game and pays for fck all.
The leeches.
And we should not go design wise to cater to those pontless kids

4 Likes

Oh my. People are STILL talking about HA as if it is at all relevant? This game is WW2 FLAVORED, that’s basically it. And, frankly, it’s all it should ever try and do. “Historical Accuracy” in a ww2 shooter is stupid. The most popular shooter games have nothing to do with “accuracy” at all.

Basically, it’s plenty “accurate” enough. If you want “Historical Accuracy” this was never the game for that. Why? Because, accuracy, and good gameplay are not the same thing. I mean Enlisted now has more players on STEAM than HLL does.

1 Like

However, I do not see any obvious success after such a decision. Where are the crowds of fans? Where is the increase in online? Where is the success of the project? Do you see it? I do not see it. I see two warring camps, and I see a short rise in online after the unification of the campaigns, and the absence of its further growth. Some are pulling the game in f2p battlefield, but would you yourself change Battlefield to Enlisted? Answer this question for yourself. You are trying to follow the path of maximum resistance, competing with games created by titans of the gaming industry. But are you sure that the Latvian company will be able to compete with Electronic Arts? I do not think so. If the project has a future, it is clearly not competition with Battlefield.

2 Likes

But they had awful Alpine map with both teams running in circles. That one map with huge bridge in the middle was also very poorly designed. And i would rather take 5 cave maps than one Aerodrome what a crap map it was. You were just standing on respawn dying to the enemies spawn camping your spawn not a single way was safe enough to move from there.

BF markings are overpowered, and why would you want a rally far away from the combat?

Enlsited is a let’s take it again WW2 Squad based FPS.
that’s what it was, is and should continue to be and not go down the wrong pathc of watering down and become another useless arcade CoD copy a la Fortninte

2 Likes

Evidence?
Because I only see the same five plebs over and over for like two years now.
According to robhir, game gew since they merged the campaigns. People who still join afterwards but think the game is supposed to be haunting ambitious/ historical accurate are morons who deny reality.

Dunno, at least my bias has numbers.

No, we should design an unfun and unbalanced game for like five people.
That is economic.

Dunno, I don’t get numbers from you so I have to deal with your words and they ain’t impressive.

I just look at the numbers. HLL is played by few people. Post Scriptum is played by even less. Enlisted is played by more. Battlefield V is played by more. And the big players like CoD and Rainbow 6 are played the most. And those games have very little to do with “accuracy”.

Just because YOU want something doesn’t mean EVERYONE wants the same thing. You are not a good arbiter of what makes a game successful. The numbers prove that.

2 Likes

I’m not a fan of historical accuracy, but this is an exaggeration, almost everything in BR5 is from the end of the war, I killed an IS 1944 with my panzerschreck (1943) in Moscow (1941-42) and then killed enemies who use AS44 (1944) with my G43 kurz (probably 1944) and STG 44 (44-43).

PLEASE let us keep these maps for ALL BRs…it’s awesome!! It adds so much for players getting bored with the same maps…those that want to argue the historical accuracy of low BR in Berlin, that’s a moot point now that we have exerimental weapons and jets that never saw WWII action so the game can try and keep the factions balanced. Please…more maps, it’s what keeps us happy!! Where’s the Manchurian campaign?

4 Likes

I hope those who agree with this change will not complain about P47 and KT in Tunisia in the future.

Top 10 spiciest threads in forum history

3 Likes