After the Germans bombed pearl harbor, The Italian banzai charges on Guadalcanal were so effective that Japan helped defend Normandy and sent 3 divisions of Ho-Ri tanks to Berlin.
11 Likes
They should have done this with the mergeā¦
Fight meā¦
Not entirely sure tbh. probably not.
The main difference between the numbers of robihr and Steam numbers is that his numbers only show players who were in matches but also include console plebs. To the credit of HLL, it is also available on consoles (I think) and the Epic store/ launcher so Steam can only give so much of data until it reaches its scope.
Would be interesting though to see how many plebs open Enlisted across all platforms just to let it run in the background.
This is like when you let Siri drive your car. In 90% of dev car accidents they claimed they didnt see the road because they were looking for the map app.
HLL was in humble choice which could be bought for $6 and also keyshops had it ultra cheap for months after that bundle. Now itās obviously more expensive. HLL is also in game pass and was free in EGS so less people will buy it on Steam.
What you donāt like getting Hvar spammed to death?
Rip Para we will have some new vid complaining about BR5 at Tunisia now 
7 Likes
How about we just get some NEW MAPS the recycled maps are becoming boring just changing spawn points or capture points within the maps is not new and refreshing.
4 Likes
I want to be able to choose between FEWER maps! Not being made to play the eastern front crap and Berlin. I absolutely HATE those. Stop STOP STOP! I just want to play Tunisia and Normandy, NOTHING else. Ever.
But even so, Steam has a very good online. I am saying all this to dispel the myth about āunpopular hardcore gamesā and āvery popular arcadesā. Both types of games have very similar online levels, and it is wrong to say that no one plays HLL. They do, and quite a lot.
1 Like
I mean yeah new maps need to be added because even opening up all current maps to all BRās will get stale eventually.
I just got a Germany BR3 game
I was in Berlin
I saw T-28 and T-50 fight against meā¦
NGL if I had to force BS like that onto the players Iād probably resign
3 Likes
Mate, enlisted and HLL have different target audience, just like the difference between warthunder and DCS. Warthudner became successful precisely because they expanded their audience by first introducing cold war and then modern warfare. It has long abandoned its āWWIIā base. Do I like it, no, but the market shows the opposite result. Like or not, this is the trend, plus DF is under Gaijin. HA wonāt attract new players whatsoever. āHAā games are fun to play with friends occasionally but wonāt work well as a live service game that forces players to grind all the time.
Custom map selection is comin in fall of 2050 be on the lookoutā¦
2 Likes
HVAR to death.
Spawn
Die to jet
Spawn
Die to calliope
spawn
Due to Pershing with rockets
Spawn
Die to super Pershing
3 Likes
I am not against the game going into other eras, but it should be done competently and with dignity. If it is Vietnam, then it should look like Vietnam, and not like Vietnam with the weapons of the Afghan war and so on. The same thing here: WW2 should remain WW2, and only when the canonical WW2 exhausts itself (and this has not happened yet) can we talk about the transition to a new era. but it is too early for this.
Well, yes, such confusion with the WW2 companies can hardly be called any kind of harbinger of new eras
All these recent posts focused on mapsā¦ something is definitely cooking. Do I catch catch the scent of a long-awaited promise being brought to a slow, savory simmerāand from the smell of it, youāre even adding more seasoning than promised? If whatās coming is as hearty as I hope it will be, then Iām very much looking forward to this meal.
And once that main course is servedā¦ might I inquire about dessert? Youāve previously promised the ability to choose soldier nationalitiesāso that squads finally feel correct with the right soldiers manning the squads. Thatāll be a satisfying step on its own. But if youāre feeling equaly generous, could we also expect a similarly rich offering for this promise as well? Like expanding the squad roster itself to let us field all squad types for all nationalities?
Right now, many nations still donāt have access to a full range of roles from the tech-treeāthereās no British Sniper squad, for instanceāas well as vehicles being driven by squads of the wrong nationalities. A bit of a mismatched recipe, wouldnāt you say?
Itād be great to know what kind of sweet surprises might be coming next. 
2 Likes
My warthunder example should already make it clear, or perhaps you are not familiar with warthunder meta in recent years. Gaijin have opted to completely decouple factions (so Soviet and Germany at the same side, so as US and JP) and contiune to introduce anachronistic future tanks into both low br and middle br that fk up poor WWII and cold war vehicles. Enlistedās direction is pretty clear with the introduction of su9. Any more talks of HA is just delulu at this point. This type of game attract players not by feelings and atmosphere but by its sheer collections of in game items that make you want more flashy new toys.
Nonsense, just a while earlier you stated that the original player base/supporters were ignorant for viewing enlisted marketing in a certain way, now youāre saying that Iām trying to steer the game towards my own personal standards. Which is it, am I the one trying to steer the game in a new direction or is it you, because your earlier comment states the latter. These two posts of yours are completely at odds, stick with one direction for your argument please.
Again, as many of us have stated over, and over, and over, and over, AND OVER, AND OVER, AND OVER, we do not want a mil-sim, we do not want/expect a historically perfect game, you lot seem incapable of grasping this, willfully or otherwise. You routinely pointing out items being out of place at launch is not an argument, nearly everyone was on board with that at launch, including me.
Throwing the word strawmen out, is not an argument, what are you even talking about, Iāve been consistent since this began.
6 Likes
It yes, it is like you dont know what you want.
No, I said that they should have seen early on that they lied in their marketing by having stuff in campaigns which should not be there according to their own marketing standards.
You responded to that by saying you did not care about ātotal historical accuracyā or whatever despite this being the standard promised by the devs.
Which you are but is not contrary to my previous words, especially since you are not even part of the original player base to begin with.
Depends on how long you are going to deny the fact that the game was never historical according to its own standards and that we do not measure it with your standards.
The many many many many many many people where we still donāt get the numbers numbers numbers numbers numbers from are irrelevant because people care about what DF marketized not what they think.
milsilm itself is not even a requirement in terms of historical accuracy. It refers to FPS elements such as movement. What we know, it still can mean we run around with Fedorovs in Berlin like in the old days, but unlike now we cannot auto-fire with it while moving without screwing accuracy and recoil.
I didnāt know that the launch was in 2023.
Also, you still got fooled because the game promised standards that it didnāt fulfil so now going around two years later and complaining that the game does not fulfil your standards when it did not even fulfil its own is some weird kink but to each their own.
Just like making one to begin with.
Do you know what strawman means?
1 Like