I have been waiting for its addition for a long time as well. If you ask me they should have given us the T-44-100 in this very event itself. Plus that DshK on top is the icing on the cake. It should have been a truly worthwhile unlock rather than this ‘glass canon’ which we are getting instead.
i don’t see why not.
but i fear it’s going to be a premium one… or event as well.
Panther world be a great event vehicle. It’s unique but not very different from TT ones.
Its already in editor its not question of will Panther F be added rather when also iirc it was available in close Beta and you could use it
1 Like
Well. I think question is rather if it will be for free and since its a proto, its a 50/50.
And if it is for gold, I dont care about it in terms of balance or need.
No it has premium in its name in editor which means either it will be a premium or event (Event Tanks & planes have premium name in the editor,too)(Though they could change it )
2 Likes
That’s because it was already in game back then.
Personally I don’t think it matters whether or not there is a balance justification or reason for adding something, it should be added regardless
That includes different models, variants, etc.
Not to beat it again but
It’s like the Tiger H1. Some would say what’s the point of having it if we have the Tiger E. I say it’s cool because it’s the first model of Tiger so why not.
The more the merrier. Anything and everything
1 Like
No, we don’t need German napkinwaffe
I’ll accept prototypes to a degree, but actual napkin shit can stay out
I’ll repeat what I said earlier in that I am a little apprehensive about paper, I mean at least with usual prototypes they were built to some degree but paper is basically entire fictional, and then we get into the nitty gritty of people arguing well using prototypes in the first place is fictional or comparing which pencil drawing should get in. It’s complicated
However I also look at it as WW2 was the greatest war in all of human history and it truly is amazing how technology pushed itself for warfare and it would be cool to be able to play with these things.
I’m sure everyone has a paper tank or plane that they really think is cool. And in a game we could play with what could’ve been.
So I’ll say with paper I’m a…….maybe (leaning towards yes)
1 Like
than just go to the g, it had prototypes
Japan is one side that does not have a vehicle that could put up an equal fight with the Sherman Jumbo or the M26. Only field and shore guns, and as we know, the Japanese built only one vehicle with a shore gun.
Jumbo is extremely overrated. Very bad gun for it’s BR. And armor is good only against casuals who are not aware of its weakspot.
Panthers or T-34-85 are definitely way better BR4 tanks.
All that DF needs to do si place chi-to or chi-ri on place of chi-nu.
It may be overrated, but the Japanese had few guns that could knock out American medium tanks from a distance of more than 300 m. Although considering the size of the islands on which the battles took place and their shape, this should not be a problem.
If bullet vs. armor physics in games were realistic, the game would play differently. The same would happen if, as a result of hits without penetration, damage to installations inside the head, such as hydraulics or electrics, which are sensitive to shocks.
Not really, you need to aim for pixel to hit its mg port.
Their gun have similar performance as a long barrel panzer4. If long barrel panzer 4 is bad against Jumbo, so will chi-to or chi-ri.
Lmao, definitely not a pixel shot.
It isn’t bad. It can OHK jumbo very reliably because of explosive filler.
Meanwhile jumbo won’t be.
Lol, many players on this forum literally use this to describe jumbo mg port.
Well the problem is to hit it.
No, it’s not xD and just because you say it, it just won’t be true. 
Either reduce your sensitivity or train. Because the Jumbo weakspot is literally one of the easiest ones to hit.
Lol stop living in your imagination.
Tell me which is the harder one?