Doing to same to helmets somehow lead to more micro transactions for body armor? Logic is just profoundly not there infact away from the milky way and it’s clear you’re not listening to me but pass me I see no point in continuing with empty convo
In that case weapon upgrades, soldier tiers and vitality should be removed as well.
Because how is it balanced when mixmaxers will face a full team of clueless casuals?
There’s so much room for potential imbalance in this game.
And literally the only people who care about body armor gimmicks are minmaxers, meanwhile the vast majority of people don’t even know that such a thing exists. That’s how this “issue” is influential to overall balance.
And I bet if it weren’t for the data miners actually providing accurate numbers and stats, basically no one would pay attention if their smg with 600 to 1000 rof kills the enemy on 2 or 3 hits.
But I guess we simply can’t have any kind of minor flavor in this game. Everything needs to be dull, blunt and mainly 1:1.
This is true. This the only thing I would change. For every outfit that offers some bonuses, I would list those bonuses right next to them. So everyone can see them without digging through some data mined sheets.
And I would add other bonuses to other outfits. Like a bonus to reload speed, bonus to ammo supply, bonus to running, etc.
But only to torsos.
It would be nice to have another way to customize the soldier.
Yes, but the firing rate of AVS36 must reach 800 and stop adding better submachine guns for Germany, because without bulletproof vests, they only need 2 shots to kill Soviet people.
Someone has strengthened FG42 with the excuse of ‘the Soviet Union has bulletproof vests’, and now they are requesting to remove the effectiveness of the bulletproof vest.Shameless guy.
The balance in the mouths of hypocrites is only to strengthen their camp.
Well, for a start, it does not stop at affecting SF rifle performance.
As far as I am concerned, this was not stated by the devs and it is also worth noting that Germany is not only fighting Russia.
I also remember that some people kept talking about asymmetrical balance so I dont know why having a slightly better SF rifle is OP now, especially if the other side has better SMGs, better ARs and arguably better MGs at least at BR5 while the other side “only” has better tanks.