Iol, so now japan goes from “suffers” to “p2w”. I win just as much without them though. They aren’t all that anymore, extremely niche now.
Japan still suffers when it come to vehicles not to small arms. And yes the game has a lot of P2W mechanics not only Japan the Allies faction has the most P2W elements.
Think you need to look up the definition of pay to win.
The game has a lot of P2W elements. There is a lot of broken premium squads specially some vehicles where you can rotate them endlessly. So yeah there is a lot of P2W elements in Enlisted. Japan is the most fair to play faction out of the 4 factions.
Japan’s tanks really aren’t bad? The ho-i is an amazing br2 tank. The new one that got moved to br3 the chi-to 2? Or maybe its chi-nu 2? Their tank names all sound similar lmao, referring to the long barrel that was br4, now br3 one shots everything. And of course the ho-ri in br5 is really strong.
They really only have some big gaps in planes
Well you can try playing against KV-1 or KV-2 in BR II or BR III good luck and vs BR IV there is a lot of crazy tanks that the soviets have and even the allies with the Jumbo. For sure the Japanese tanks are worse then the allies and the soviet tanks specially with the KV if it was not for Ki-100 good luck destroying the KVs…
They’re not bad, they’re just consistently not the best. Tanks like the Ho-I and Chi-Nu II are good, they’re just not as good as the tanks they have to face. The Ho-Ri is the major exception here because it is a monster if you use it right, but that’s 1 exceptional tank, a handful of good ones, and a majority of unusable trash.
But yeah the Japanese air tree is abysmal, they also need more rifles because fuck the Type 4
1 Like
Not only our tanks have no armor at all for sure they are not equal. Specially on BR I, BR III and BR IV I mean how this tanks are equal:
And he cries that the Zero would be OP in BR I but when we look at their tanks well for sure one is better then the other. He is biased person plays only one faction.
Not to mention that BR1 Stuart in the picture front pens every Japanese tank until the Ho-Ri
1 Like
Thats the problem and he claims Japanese tanks are not worse maybe in BR V they are not in every other BR for sure Japan has the worst tanks.
its super ‘’’ fair ‘’ … they are ‘‘balanced’’
They are not TT, but both Chi-ha with 57mm and 47mm are solid enough BR 1 tanks, at least. But yea Japan is kinda cooked on BR 1 as the tank performance goes if you don’t have those.
1 Like
They are just as good as U.S. tanks. The chi nu 2 has 85kg of explosive in aphe (20 more than u.s. tanks), and penn 146mm @100m, shermans only get 100, only the m10/18 get that much penn but are paper vehicles with open top. It’s hands down better than equivalent br3 U.S. equipment.
The ho i aphe has 460kg? Explosive (Not sure if that’s an error cause that’s crazy) with 40mm penn and the heat gets 90mm penn, and it gets solid HE rounds. M8 scott is the only thing that gets heat and again it’s open top. It’s performs extremely well in br2 against U.S. once again.
They are not. They have APHE not APC or APCBC unlike US tanks or German tanks and suffers massively against sloped armor. Also, they reloads rather slow and with armors made of paper. I believe they have almost flat 50mm on both hull and turret. Also they are lacking the coaxial MG on the turret only coaxial MG on the hull then even that MG has very low capacity so has to be reloaded very often. Even the mobility on them are not that good. All those adds up which makes these tank really undesirable to use compared to something like Sherman which is sooo much better in many ways.
1 Like
Just cause the number is higher doesn’t suddenly make the tank better, 140mm of pen on a Japanese tank isn’t better than 100mm of pen on an American tank. It’s not the number that matters it’s the interactions, both tanks will still one shot each other, but one has better armor for downtiers and infantry, better HE, a faster reload, and better Mgs
1 Like
not only there is neither fighters or ground attackers to compensate for the lack of TT tanks… since in the TT is only trash. I would have understand if we had amazing fighters like the soviets or good ground attackers like Germany but no nothing xD Don’t bother with the Bandit he is allies main he cant see the other faction problems he only knows is bad to fight Panthers with BR III Allies vs BR IV Germany but goes blind when you have Japan BR II vs BR III USSR KVs or BR III Japan vs BR III USSR or BR III Japan vs BR IV USSR where you have IS-1 and ISU-152.
Even when we need him to help the Allies faction he is useless not even voting to help us out :
AP-4C (F4U-1C) back to BRIV - Suggestions / Battle Rating - Enlisted — official forum
He wants F4U in BR IV but did he ever voted no…
1 Like
Chi nu 2 takes out the kv1 with ease
And KV 1 takes Chi Nu with ease however even lower BRs dont have problem taking out Chi nu 2 try taking KV 1 with Japan BR II… better go vote on the poll at least you will do something positive then continue denying the problem that Japan has no armor.
Well, japan doesn’t have to fight germany, so i guess that’s a valid point, but it’s really only a point because u.s. tanks aren’t that great. I will still argue more AP filler is better though. Not having a MG in the turret doesn’t really bother me that much, think people here give it more value than it really has.
Ho-i has 90mm pen, kv1 is only 75 frontal with no slope. Might take a few shots but can still kill the gunner before you die.
It’s been a suggestion for 2 years. I’ve voted on it in the past. Devs know people want it back, voting here ain’t going to do anything about it.
See no point arguing with you…that’s why the allies faction always will be a lost cause.