Right after talking bout a difference in HE filler between the Sherman and the Chi-Nu
1 Like
Maybe you’re just bad with their equipment? What other conclusion is there when you claim ki-100 is an average plane and that the tanks are bad. Along with seeing how i don’t struggle any where near the levels you claim playing japan it’s the only thing that makes sense.
More filler equals more damage to a tank’s interior, more crew dead/better chance of killing the whole crew and better chances of blowing the tank. To me this is far more important to survival than a turret mg. You can work around not having one. Can’t really work around not blowing the tank as much.
Nothing to do with the equipment its the playerbase… as you can see freeloaders like you made the allies the kid noob faction…that like to have easy mode all the time having the best equipment but the easy mode is almost over.
So now you’re saying Japan’s equipment is fine? 
you really threw your whole argument out the window there.
Send a screenshot of your japan battles and win rate.
Well obviously you cant read 
Equipment matters very little when clearly one faction has better players then the other and will win even if it has worse equipment since the allies are literally the faction with the most noobs and you are a perfect example of that.
How this is important the win rate depends on the team. The only thing that depends on you is your K/D ratio and also is not solid indicator of nothing since this depends on the class you play the most. All I see is childish arguments.
You are a perfect example why people given up on the allies faction with such players… I told you its the playerbase the biggest problem with the Allies they have the best equipment in every BR outside of BR I and BR IV that are not very popular BRs however the playerbase is cancer.
Literally the best tanks from BR 1 - BR 3 are US/UK tanks tho. Only recently that M4A3 105 got moved up to BR 4 so they are less oppressing now but M4A2 75mm, judging from the roll call stats still one of the best tank on BR 3.
On BR 1 M5A1 Stuart is one of the best tank in the game that only Panzer 3 J on BR 1 might be better than the Stuart due to the 50mm gun and 5 men crew members.
On BR 2, M8 scott is a very solid vehicle as well. Also not many people knows this but 57mm HE that US/UK using got some really busted stats and it’s almost as powerful as some of the 75mm HE which means that Crusader is actually incredible BR 2 vehicle. Only BR 4 tanks are lacking. BR 5 tanks are good enough. At least much much better than the Soviet BR 5 tanks honestly.
And now you look at the Japan. From BR 1 to BR 4 it’s constantly fiiled up with trash level tanks. Only Ho-I is okay(even then it has much slower reload speed than the M8 scott so it’s not even close for HE/HEAT spam), only BR 5 is somewhat okay due to the imaginary tank called Ho-ri but that’s about it. Still casemated TD with terrible awareness since it doesn’t have a commander hatch.
This is only theoretically possible. In actual in-game situation Ho-I versus KV-1, because KV-1 has an insane amount of overlapped parts on the turret and the fact that side armor is also 75mm, against angled KV-1 the Ho-I will only have a very small section of turret on KV-1 that can be penetrated with it’s HEAT. And since it’s HEAT, even penetrating the turret won’t disable KV-1 properly. At best just killing the gunner or loader. KV-1 will likely recover and return fire which kills Ho-I in one shot instead.
In fairness, Ki-100 is really good airplane i’d go far as to say that it’s BR 4 airplane rather than BR 3 airplane.
This would have been true if US tanks were all stuck with solid AP shots but they are not. Except the guns like 37mm or BR 2 75mm guns, they can kill just as good if not better due to what USA usually fighting. Cramped japanese tanks with paper armor from BR 1 - BR 4, german tanks have no armor till BR 4. There’s a reason that 75mm Sherman performs so well in Enlisted.
You need barely any HE filler to one shot a tank consistently, it’s only worth brining up if we’re comparing solid shot to APHE
There is usually 1 to 2 people who carry the team for all nations. It matters because if you have a low/lower win rate then it clearly shows it’s not soley because of the good player base and therefore you struggle with their equipment
Hands down the panzer j and panzer flame tank, pz j is leagues better than everything else and the flame tank feels so incredibly OP in br1. I’ve personally got over 40 kills with it in the first 20 seconds of a game a few different times. I’ve never been able to do that with anything else.
Br2, i would say there’s no clear winner, every nation has good tanks each with a negative trait in one area. One thing for sure though is all other nations have heat or filled AP for their standard br1/2 rounds. Allies only have the rhino in br1 (event) and m8 in br2. I feel this is a pretty significant handicap when comparing tank on tank combat. M24 does perform well enough, but it’s post penn damage sure feels awful, also has an extremely long reload, and awful armor.
Br3 kv1 is obviously a highlight, but once again, chi nu 2 handles it well. The sherman is just an all arounder. Either way, based on who fights what, i will concede and say the sherman is “better” even though I feel it’s insignificant because pz4h and chi nu 2 don’t really struggle with it, neither do the AT launchers.
I’ve always been partial to the t-34-57 for br3
I only have one of them, but like with all the other parachute squads I rarely use them.
2 Likes
Premium Paras aren’t pay to win (IMO) unless you use them somewhat conservatively, usually just pay to be XP pinata cosplay.
1 Like
That’s BS people that play in a team have higher win rate then people that play solo. There is many players that have kills but they never build spawn points. The game is pure teamplay teams win no solo players.
1 Like
Thats the good one the other one is pure P2W since they have BR V weapon in BR IV xD But the cosmetics on the other one are better wish this one had the same cosmetics like the BR IV paratroopers.
1 Like
I play solo in PC lobbies. If your win rate is less than mine, then you’re the “freeloader” doing nothing to contribute towards the win. That’s my main point. Atleast 90% of my games I am the difference between a victory and a loss. One person in these lobbies doing what they’re supposed to, does in fact make the difference here.
Ok John Wayne ,
The ‘‘freeloader’’ is someone that complains all the time but dose not want to change nothing has nothing to do with the game. You are complaining that the Ki-100 is OP or you want some vehicle or aircraft to be lower in BR but you are not doing nothing about it and when the people that actually do something about it ask you to help them out you say ‘’ ohh the devs willl do nothing ‘’ what is this then a ‘‘freeloader’’ that comes to the forum just to complain but never contributes ?
And once again you are talking lies we all remember your crazy claims about war thunder how you are ace of aces from you its all lies. I’m not the one claiming ‘’ having 90% win rate with Germany as a console solo player ‘’
You’ve made thie claim multiple times. I have zero issues with it in br3. Just because something is strong doesn’t mean it needs to be moved.
I don’t see a point in voting multiple times for the same thing in short time frames. Like how many times has body armor been put to a vote? It’s a waste of time, and realistically, yes, just talking about it is enough to garner attention. Votes themselves are often times biased, most german and jap players will vote no to something that doesn’t benefit them. That’s a huge % right off the bat. Would also think there’s more german players on the forum than allies.
Never said i have a 90% win rate, i said I’m the determining factor in 90% of games. For one there wasn’t battle ratings for the first year+ of my time here and germany overwhelmingly steamrolled then and immediately after ratings for quite some time. I fully played u.s. pre merge, then finished the u.s. tree after, then the russian tree when they lost 90% of games. Then i went to germany right when they started getting stomped, and did japan last. I literally went against the grain from the start and took a huge hit to wins and k/d. I now have all 70%+ win rate. Japan may be around 80%
Ok John Wayne whatever you say xD
