It’s absurd that this clunker is stuck at BR 4, since it can only fire when deployed or prone. Think about it: BR 4 constantly gets uptiered into BR 5. Do you really expect players facing te4 mg42 34 to drop to the ground instead of shooting back the instant they spot an enemy?
What’s more, this weapon could realistically be fired off‑hand with both hands.XD
Preferably we get hip fire but no ADS, same for all weapons with this brace or prone mechanic too ergo the Browning .303 and Solothurn. Failing that downtier it to BR 3 IMO, BR 2 might be a bit much. Another thing is a Browning 1919a6 with 50 rounds would be a nice at BR 3 as an equivalent to the MG 34 (50).
You do realize that that’s a japanese words, not chinese words.
I’d advice you to stop throwing random chinese accusations and mocking at them.
Else, you’d risk another ban. I can’t be sure about this but it could be a permanent one if you keep this up i assume.
What do you even mean that i’m threatening you? I holds no power on forum moderation whatsoever. I’m saying that because you got banned a while ago for that exactly same reason, Insulting others. Thus you have higher chance to get a ban again for repeated misbehavior like that. That’s it.
In reality it should have never been added in the first place… what a stupid weapon to add if they didn’t want to do it properly… adding firing from hip must be too difficult since apparently since it was forwarded.
It did start in br2 and did not need to go prone, but a bunch of people demanded all at rifkes in br1, and all non exploding ones did, I think the type 92 could follow if Japan had any other at br1 weapon