The SU-85 - the predecessor of the SU-85M for BR3

?? except there are BR 2 TDs and br 3 TDs. marder uses a BR 4 gun, sp logically the stug G will be br 3. this is an equivalent. Stug G has weakspots, this also has weakspots. How do you not get this?

1 Like

If the T-34-57 is similar to the pz4H, trading firepower for less weakspots, (both br3), then su85 is the ewuivalent of the stug g, without trading the firepower for armor.

2 Likes

Only reason marder is at BR2 is the KV and shermans.
I dont think the SU BR3 is facing even remotely same situation as GE BR2 vs SU BR3.

And, if the KV’s werent downtiered due to idiotic “Iconic” reason, marder wouldnt ever needed in BR2.

Man I just hate when I forget that the tiger and panthar exist man

1 Like

Well, eventually you will learn both can be taken out frontally.
Much like J1 can take on KV1 frontally.

I have high hopes on you young one.

Yet somehow marder 2 h and stug 3 g and Alecto and other tanks are ok but the su85 magically isn’t.

1 Like

Alright, so both basic tanks can take on the other basic tanks with difficulty, but there are TDs for each BR aswell. Boom, there you go.

Same gun as PZ4’s.
Not exactly same as SU.

what is this argument? it is an equivalent. They are similar.

1 Like

Sure, find a SU TD with BR3 gun and its good to go.

the kwk 40 is a br 4 gun

1 Like

145mm of pen and more armor. Not buying it buddy

1 Like

Su76……

1 Like

seems to appear in BR3 in F2.
Are you saying the panthers are too high or have too little firepower ?

panzer 4 is br 3 because of less armor, we’ve explained that to you.

2 Likes

And not because its suitable opponent to what it faces at BR3 ?

Tanks with guns outside their br: panzer 3 j, marder 2 h, m24, Alecto, su76, bt7f32, m10, dicker max, Flakbus, sig, chi nu2, panthar, m36, firefly, Achilles, jagdpanthar, etc

I said that because you brought up an AT rifle out of all the stuff out there first.

Again, I said that because you brought up an AT rifle out of all the stuff out there first. You could have brought a better examples to make your point less illogical and sounds weird i think.

You brought AT rifle as a talking point of yours and now you are suddenly talking about more advanced HE and stuff? What?

You phrased it as if you’d get shot by the infantry from the top of vehicle. Look what you typed before.

This is what you said.
The more i hear you saying, the more i feel like you are very into bad faith argument and being dishonest here. Let’s not do that.

1 Like

I’m sure that in the future devs will find some prototype for BR3 germany to get. This is still a developing game. Each nations will have sniper tanks like the panzer 4 and brawling tanks like the t34

And im pretty sure the list of tanks that can be taken out with simple AT rifle isnt very long.
Considering it is the worst AT weapon of the game.

It is quite self-explanatory if a tank can be taken out by any range from any angle with AT rifle that nothing else struggles with it.

Thats how bad the armor is.

Again, highlights the absolutely non-existent armor rather well if BR1 AT weapon can take it out easily.

You do understand that SF rifles are by far better than BA rifles ?
Which was argument towards your claim that sig is more survivable at higher BR’s.