I’m so happy that my favorite weapon has become much easier to use. I was getting really tired of the Lancaster 50.
Great change! (alongside a lot of others, G41 and Gerat 03 buffs were really needed, same with G43 Kurz ammo count)
Any chance the other Type 99 (Early) derivatives will get the same buff? (Type 99 with grenade launcher, Long Type 99 Sniper and regular, Type 100 rifle).
The late type 99 could do with a minor firerate buff too (same RoF as the old 99 early would be ideal, but same RoF as the Kar98k kriegsmodell would be fine too).
Would also be nice to see a firerate increase for the P14 rifle, and movement dispersion buffs for the P14, SMLE and Kar98k kriegsmodell to be in line with other bolt actions (15->8).
4 Likes
This one is buffed to 69 when maxed as well. Long 99s and 100 are unchanged.
2 Likes
Oh that’s great, thanks for sharing! The type 100 is (like you said) basically the same gun (irl and in-game), so should def be brought in line with the base 99 early.
Could do with an ammo count increase too imo (alongside all the other low tier para squads, the thompson para is gonna chew through ammo with its new RoF), to be the same as the high tier para squads (basically 1-2 extra mags over their base weapon variants).
1 Like
Type 99 rifle (early): Base RoF 48 → 60
While the fire rate increase is nice, it’s still arguably worse than the Type 38 Rifle in BR1. I’ll take the increased RoF, muzzle velocity, and accuracy of the Type 38 over a little extra damage and reload speed. I wish there was a more compelling reason to upgrade once you hit BR2, since You’re probably already going to have a dozen or more fully upgraded Type 38’s on the cheap already.
Type 4 Rifle: Fixed damage falloff at longer ranges (similar to other rifles like the M1 Garand)
This is a move in the right direction. Now if we could do something about its accuracy that would be grand.
Type Otsu: Base recoil 66/34 → 49/25
Love this! Can’t wait to try it out.
Type Ko rifle: Reload time 5.4 → 3.6, Recoil 68/25 → 49/18
Oh how I wish this was in the tech tree. It’s everything that the Type 4 Rifle wants to be.
1 Like
And what about Type 99 LMG when you gonna move that Bren gun to BR II ? With the rest of the Bren guns xD
Move Type 99 LMG 
BR II - Suggestions / Battle Rating - Enlisted — official forum
7 Likes
When the type 11 moves to BR 1
4 Likes
Still waiting for the Nashorn to be moved to BR3.
Also the A6M3 zeros with drop tanks moving to BR2 should be on that list along with the MkB 42H & Horn StG to BR 4.
8 Likes
The M1A1 historical rate of fire isn’t 700 rpm the highest I seen documented was 650 which would be 780 rpm for that
The ones that have 700 or more is the M1 Thompson getting the M1A1 sight protectors
So this is probably depicting a M1 conversion Thompson than a M1A1
Also the ZB-26 had a historically lower rate of fire
1 Like
Yeah i thought it was an odd change too, might actually be worse for the gun too because it already has average recoil and bad ammunition economy
3 Likes
It has the same as the other thompsons issue come that when you get that and not increase the ammo reserve it falls more shorter than others
Can we acturally change the animation of Type 99 early? Now with 60 rof the animation is too fast to be seen almost!
No
We finally get the Heer-style eagle insignia now, which exists alongside the Luftwaffe variant for Luftwaffe squads.
24 Likes
So now pls on the Feldbluse too
6 Likes
Done
3 Likes
@MajorMcDonalds
The closure of the public testing server has been postponed until June 8th.
And the content has been updated again to 1GB.
Please ask CM to update the test content notes to the latest version as soon as possible~
2 Likes
When they decide to put LMGs to BR I same like the trucks apcs will be much better then now Type 11 takes like half of your screen when you aim xD
3 Likes
Wait… I just noticed this minor change, I thought the update wasn’t touching the Patchett before now.
No Velocity change? No RoF Change? No Dispersion change? Come on…
I’m dissapointed. Very dissapointed. The Patchett will continue to remain inaccurate…?
2 Likes