Bayonet does not seem to work on Fedorov Avtomat :
It’s equipped but it does not appear in game and doesn’t not affect the ingame rifle.
Also, Koko rifle and Fedorov Rifle as well as previously owned Fedorov Avtomat don’t have bayonets unless you buy new weapons.
Same for the Johnson Rifle :
probably because
It also feels similar to my obtainable cosmetics unique idea I spoke about before, so maybe there will be more to it
Wait what? I take off from a carrier with it very often unless something changed?
Edit: nvm saw what you meant later
She was talking about its irl capabilities. She clarified it in later replies. Just keep reading.
yeah I missed that part, still hungover and jsut slowly crawling through the forum posts.
Continuing the discussion from Preliminary patch notes for the "Far Eastern Front" update:
This does not seem to be entirely true though :
Yeah, if you aim for the head 
These ones are part of original tank, not a skin. At least if I remember correctly.
At this point I want to know why the devs refuse to make the StuG 3F BR2.
Why is the recoil for the Charlton Automatic getting adjusted instead of the dispertion?
wait, didnt the sitrep literally mention adding the balkenkreuz to customization?
Ah yes you are right. Thank you for pointing this.
But still there is no information regarding the additional armor value provided by the skin itself.
Same for the M14
Why is the Charlton Automatic recoil getting adjusted instead of the dispertion?
Yeah, I got baited very hard. 
Now I’ll have to wait another 3 months for next major update.
Charlton Automatic Rifle:
→ ROF buff wasn’t needed - all I wanted with the suggestion was a buff of the reload time and the recoil. The ROF buff might caused that it will still have shit recoil
M2 Stinger:
→ never had a 200round box
→ reduce it to the real 100round box
→ maybe nerf recoil a little bit (it has better recoil control then the slower firing MG 42)
M2 Carbine sawoff:
→ put that piece of trash weapon on BR III / IV
MP 35:
→ ROF buff from 620 to 750 is far to strong in relation to the MP 35/I (talking about real life) - that would cause that people demand to put it on BR III but it should stay on BR II
→ I suggest ROF buff from 620 to 650
MP 35/I:
→ damage reduction wasn’t needed
→ keep the base damage on 6.0 and give us the other changes
A6M2 Reisen:
→ good, that it’s starts now from the air. what about both A6M3 (Event and Premium)? As far as I know both starting from the carrier aswell
new suggestions:
MG 42 + MG 42 100:
→ both still have the wrong ROF (990)
→ real ROF was aprox. 1,400 - 1,500
MG 81:
→ ROF ingame is far to high
→ real ROF was 800 - 1,000 because it was changed to fit as ground weapon (only on planes it had a ROF of 1,760)
It doesn’t show in armor viewer but it does provide protection
The extra armor falls off of the tank once destroyed
If it’s historical, sure… But yeah, otherwise the RoF changes are not needed, the rest are nice though.
And yeah, just more RoF will make it even harder to control, I like the way it functions now…
Sounds good to me, at least the ahistorical 200 round box needs to go.
Let that filth rot for all I care, it doesn’t exist anyway.
Damage reduction was absolutely not needed. 
The A6M2 is now airborne because the TT version is actually incapable of carrier landings IRL, but the two M3 versions can. You can see this by the fact that the M2 has no hook for the arrester wire, whilst both M3s do.
Strangely enough, the BP version of the M2 is also being changed to start in the air, but that one actually has a hook for carrier landings, so it shouldn’t be changed.
Btw, changing planes to be air start means removing carrier landings capability in totale from the aircraft. I get the feeling that you think this only means they’ll start in the air, not that the repair function will be removed too.
Yes please, I still don’t like being able to hear individual shots from the MG 42.
Huh? You learn something new every day.
You should make a suggestion about this.
Will do it when I get the documents as proof from a mate of mine
can we keep it at the high rof so it isnt just going to perform the exact same as the beltfed mg42?
If MG 42 + MG 42 100 get the real ROF and MG 81 both would just change the ROF
