Of course, to be fair, and so that Germany can use fantasy weaponry against the other factions with fantasy weaponry. Just because it’s Germany doesn’t mean it doesn’t have the right to use that weaponry.
2 Likes
So where did Germany need those fantasy weaponry for balance? Apparently Germany doesn’t need E-75/90 for balance since Tiger2 H will be sufficient.
1 Like
He’ll need it when they bring in that fantasy Soviet tank
2 Likes
Tiger2 should have no problem penning its turret. I mean even the Panther on br4 can pen T44-100 turret. So you need to find a valid example.
That’s no excuse for not introducing the E-75/90; what’s fair is that a fantasy German tank faces off against a fantasy Soviet tank.What’s incorrect is your stance that so much real German tank should face a fantasy Soviet tank.
2 Likes
If you to talk about fair. E75/90 was never built and we don’t even know what turret and armament it actually use. While T44-100 was actually built.
In real life there is way more IS-2 produced than Tiger2 but in game the number is equal. If Germany can field fantasy number of tiger2 of course Soviet can use fantasy tank to counter it.
And you conveniently forgot to mention the most important thing: the two of them NEVER They fought in WW2
Just like the Soviet jet plane from '46 and the rest of the Soviet fantasy weaponry, no😂
It’s funny that the excuse is Germany this, Germany that, but Germany also does this simply because they want to be better than this faction.
So, using your logic, Germany also has the right to receive its jet fighters and guided missile bombers.
3 Likes
There are a lot of stuff in game that never fought in WW2. How many stuff was never built and we don’t even know how it look like?
Here is the thing if you want to use real history you also need to accept that Germany has shortage of manpower, weapons, vehicles, fuel during the end of the war. This game doesn’t consider all of that. So if Germany already get a buff of cause other factions also need to get buff.
So, using your logic, why are you complaining when I’m also asking for the same treatment so that Germany receives its fictional weaponry for its TT, just like the other factions If you are now guided by that logic
And it was precisely in 1944 that Germany produced the largest quantity of its armament and still managed to cause great casualties
This last point is simply a stupid argument on your part, an attempt to deny German weaponry and justify fictitious Soviet weaponry just because you don’t like that the Soviets are outmatched in certain areas. That the Germans dominate I also remind you of the Soviet armor, something the developers haven’t removed because it’s something “special” to the Faction.
You’re just showing your bias towards the Soviets
3 Likes
Other faction only receive fictional weaponry in their tech tree if they need it for balance. But you keep asking for stuff that Germany doesn’t need for balance. Maybe go and actually find Germany weakness and suggest prototype to buff it.
Soviet did get outmatched in certain areas but they did have the quantity to compensate for it. But you can only field the same number of tank as the Germany. How is it fair? You can’t just take all the advantage and ignore the disadvantage.
That is precisely why the E-75/90 is requested, to maintain the supremacy of power in German Tanks. And the other Factions did the same in their other areas This isn’t just a German issue.
It’s not because the game is 10 vs 10, where even if the number of players were greater the result would be the same, because the player’s ability to make the most of their weaponry also plays a role. Something that the majority of Soviet players do not do.
It’s simply easy to understand that if X has the same thing as A, then they will be fair.
3 Likes
Except T44-100 won’t be better than the Tiger2H. Germany will still maintain its tank supremacy on br5.
Wow if Soviet players are that bad why are you worrying about German tank supremacy being affected.
No matter how much the E-75/90 will keep the Soviet fantasy tank at bay, Germany shouldn’t limit itself to using only the weaponry it used in WW2 when the other factions don’t have any.This limitation, like Germany
So, should the mediocrity of the Soviet player base be rewarded with fictional weaponry to mask their low skill level? Because if the answer is YES Then it makes no sense that Germany doesn’t receive its fictitious weaponry like the others
3 Likes
Those factions receive fictional weaponry for balance. Did Germany need it for balance? Adding fictional weaponry to Germany will result in other faction getting more fictional weaponry to counter it. It seems like you don’t want balance you just want Germany to have advantage.
1 Like
This is not limited to the BR V, but applies to all BRs, and the Soviets are strong too, not just Germany.
Of course, to balance things out and be on equal footing with the fictional weaponry.
Wasn’t it rather the Soviets and Allies who triggered this domino effect with fantasy weapons, and now it’s Germany that’s asking for/needing this fictional weaponry? Because that was the cause, and it wasn’t Germany that caused it, but rather the Soviet/Allied player base with their low level of play.
This is coming from someone who supports the Soviets’ and Allies’ fantasy weapons but wants to deny them to Germany.
3 Likes
USSR already has a huge number of advantages at 5 BR: AVS-36-20, FA, RD-44, Tu-2s. KTH is Germany’s last and only advantage.
2 Likes
Okay, I’ve been ignoring this very contentious topic for a while now on purpose; time for me to share my thoughts.
-
If the T-44-100 (as it appears in War Thunder) is a prototype produced and tested during WW2, then I don’t see an issue with it being added.
-
I don’t quite care if the prototype “was bad”… reliability and crew comfort are not issues the game handles anyway.
-
If the T-44-100 is added, and some of the shells it uses in WT are post-war, then obviously the tank shouldn’t come with those post-war shells in-game. I’m stating this as a matter of principle - I don’t know anything on the subject, I just know it’s a topic that has been brought up.
-
If the T-44-100 is added, it obviously should only be added at the same time as - or after - a regular T-44 has been added (similar to how the Pershing and Super Pershing was added to the game). The T-44 itself preferably as a tech tree tank, IMHO.
-
I am less sure about the T-44-100s suitability as a tech tree tank, but it’s not a topic I am interested in discussing - I would just like it noted that calling the objectively superior choice a “alternative” to a IS-2 isn’t quite the word I would have used… I think people should be perfectly aware that this will replace the IS-2 as the “META” choice, if it is added. To what degree it will replace the IS-2 will be dictated by if it is TT, Event, or Premium.
-
If the T-44-100 is added, you bet I will be making a suggestion for a tech tree Centurion Mk I… not as some form of “retaliation”, it’s just a neat tank that no longer would have a reason not to be in the game at that point. This is a notice, not a threat.
That’s all from me. I won’t be voting either way on this one, I’d just like my thoughts noted. Cheerio. 
3 Likes
Soviet and Allies don’t need those fantasy stuff if Germany don’t have fantasy number of good stuff to begin with.
I didn’t deny fantasy weaponry to Germany. If Germany need it for balance it can get it.
As you mentioned, that would create a domino effect of adding X, Y, and Z as additions to each faction’s TT, but this person doesn’t want Germany to receive the same treatment.
2 Likes
Then suggest stuff for Germany to counter it.