So why do they have them in their TT in the first place? Easy, because what I said is true: the Allied and Soviet player base is mostly inefficient, unlike the German and Japanese Mostly
Then you don’t have to deny the Germans the E-75/90 if the Soviets also get their fantasy tank.
Even so, there are more 6,000 Panthers and almost 500 Tiger 2s than the fictional Soviet and Allied tanks and weaponry, adding that German weaponry did see combat.
So why actually saw combat should be your only criteria? That is because such criteria is advantageous for Germany. Admit it you just want Germany to get its advantage and don’t want its disadvantage. This is just double standard.
As much as i don’t like these kind of prototype vehicles that were built like only 2 and then also never saw any combat whatsoever being added even more in the game, i guess it’s gonna happen sooner or later. That’s just how things are thesedays judging from the stuff that got added recently.
Altho, it is true that Soviet BR 5 gets the best infantry equipment period(And ofc BS body armor on top of that) yet the general soviet playerbase still performs so so badly that the people genuinely trying to avoid playing Soviet BR 5 unless it’s pre stacked .
At the end of the day, what really matters is infantry game play.
Infantry wins the game but tanks do not. In a perfect world, with body armor and the best SF in the game, Soviet should have an upperhand against Germany or Japan and should have higher win ratio but it is actually the opposite, Soviet BR 5 has the lowest win ratio out of all 4 factions in the game. This is obviously not just because the tanks are bad. There’s other deep rooted issues for this and i don’t think adding some tanks alone would fix this honestly if you ask me.
The question is, how many buff would it take to finally make the terrible playerbase to go toe-to-toe against other factions? Especially against Japan. You don’t want to fight BR 5 Japan as Soviet BR 5 rn. You have to give them some absurdly crazy advantages to achieve this. Even more than what they have had recieved over years. Adding T-44-100 would helps, surely. But something tells me that that also wouldn’t be nowhere near enough.
Except your “equal footing” is not really equal? You just want a fantasy tank that is way better than this which will defeat the purpose of adding this. And guess what, other faction will receive more fantasy tank to counter German fantasy tank. Then you will just want another better German fantasy tank to counter those fantasy tank. It will be a endless cycle.
Germany wasn’t the one who triggered this domino effect, so don’t play the victim because EVERYTHING The German weaponry on their TT is real and was used in WW2
Yeah, that reminds me.
Japanese Imperial Headquarters communiqués during WWII kept boasting that they had routed American forces everywhere. Reports can lie, but the front‑line situation does not.
I also keep wondering why the Soviet Union has such a low win‑rate at top battle ratings.
I know they struggle on open‑field maps with their vehicle lineup, yet I cannot figure out all the contributing factors. Could the Japanese 30‑round light machine‑gun be overpowered and part of the problem
Type hei auto is actually the worst SF rifle to use against Soviet due to the body armor, this is because Type hei auto has relatively low damage compared to other SF. Requiring two shots to down one instead of just one even at point blank range is huge. It’s just that the entire Soviet playerbase are filled with mindless bots or at least i hope that they were bots.
Back in the campaign era, in Moscow campaign it is Soviet that have weaponry advantage like fedorov and T-34. Dev give Germany prototype MKB42H and time travelling Panzer4 F2 to counter it. Why couldn’t Soviet do the same when Germany has weaponry advantage on late war?
It was still a prototype during Moscow campaign which is fantasy by your standard. You don’t care about realism, you just want Germany to get advantage. You use see combat or not as your criteria because it benefit Germany the most. You always talk about late war superior German weaponry, but Soviet are the one that has superior weaponry on early war. But this game use br to balance that advantage. So if Soviet early war advantage need to be balance, of course Germany late war advantage need to be balance.
It’s valid because it’s a WWII game and it should adhere to what was used, because Germany also has the right to have fantasy weaponry like in Wolfenstein.
This is reflected in the Soviet BR I-III, where they dominate due to their armament.
The difference is that Germany receives real weapons and the Soviets only receive fantasy weapons. It’s NOT fair AT ALL You’re only looking out for the Soviets’ interests. And you try to justify with “arguments” that have no weight whatsoever where there are only frustrations. Yours towards the hatred towards the faction that is using its legitimate weaponry
I’ve been playing this game since 2021 when the Campaign system existed, and what I said was the norm at the time, but it ended up changing. Due to several things that had been done wrong and others due to stupid things like the low level of the Soviet and Allied players
Exactly, that’s why in BR V, where Germany already faces Soviet fantasy weaponry.
You forgot to mention the KV-1 and other armament of the BR 3
You’re making excuses about other people’s weaponry, and it’s not like Germany is accepting Allied fantasy weaponry when it’s the same thing.
And that doesn’t mean Germany has to put up with the developers’ aid to the Soviets and Allies for rewarding their mediocrity.