I hope you’re not trying to lecture me about my own country’s wartime activities.
- Swedish military aid simply did not include SMGs.
That’s the truth of the matter.
- This is because of the simple fact that the pre-WW2 Swedish military did not embrace the SMG. That was done during the course of the early days of WW2 and the Winter War.
As such, they had no SMGs that they could afford to spare. Just look at the years of official adoption for the various SMG models in use by Sweden, and then assume a minimum of one year before they get into the field. By the time WW2 kicked off, Sweden barely had enough SMGs to rub two of them together. Another simple truth.
- Difference in ammunition.
Sweden was using the 9×20mm Browning Long cartridge, which made their weapons incompatible with Finland, who were using 9×19mm Parabellum. This would have made Swedish SMGs in Finland militarily very unuseful, if a small quantity of guns were to be sent anyway.
- Manufacture had barely gotten off the ground in Sweden by the time of the Winter War’s start.
After the end of the Winter War, Sweden bought another batch of Finnish-produced SMGs, because Finland had a surplus whilst Sweden did not. Finland were already avid users of SMGs (especially in comparison); they needed heavy weapons more.
In fact, manufacture of the licensed SMGs was so inadequate for just their own needs that Sweden felt it was forced to fully switch to 9×19mm Parabellum and begin buying MP 35s from Germany. And then, they developed their own home-grown, cheaper style of SMG by the war’s end just to cope with domestic demands.
These are the facts of the matter. No Kpist m/37 guns made it to Finland as war aid, and pre-WW2 large scale adoption of SMGs was not as common as you might think it is.
If you think this is wrong, I’d urge you to provide evidence to the contrary, rather than baselessly speculate.
If the Swedish armed forces did not release m/37s (as they did with other weapons), then Finland did not receive them, full stop.