Wrong the svt unlike the stupid g41 dont have the problem of reloading by clips (4.8 seconds a full reload of 2 clips)
Lets say that you have 6 bullets so to beggin with the animation to open the place where ammo is is 1 second then adding bullet per bullet is 0.8 second (2.4 seconds if we count the 4 bullets) then for the ending animation it takes another 1.2 seconds
On a summarized way it takes 4.8 seconds to reload 4 bullets and things get worse when you only have 1 bullet which is by far the worst since a 5 clip reload take 1.30 secs along 4 bullets more 2.4 seconds the start and ending animation together are 2.2 seconds so we are talking about 5.9 seconds
So then we have svt-38
An empty mag takes 2.6 seconds to reload but and a tactic reload 2.0 is half no… even less than HALF of the time required to reload the gewerh 41
Then let stop talking about germany and lets go to other nations
Except the US m1 garand (which still have a decent reload time 3.4 and a trade of 2 bullets less) i dont see another stupid rifle with 2.6 seconds of reload and 2 of tactic reload
So as i mentioned
Or everyone eating dust (make all br 3 semis crap when it comes to reload)
Or everyone eating a good meal ( all br 3 semis must have similar reload times)
i love it you all think you are so clever
my gun that is op is not op because its weaker than a different type of weapon
its not op because another broken weapon that is still not as good as my op weapon
its not op despite any of the weapons it can actually fight against are not as good
please break my weapon further that was already lowered by one br
i refuse to compare it to any other weapon it would see in combat
id rather say something poorly than say something stupid
just say that you failed your mission on defending your point of view somehow, i would do it if i were you so i wouldnt be acting even dumber while digging a even deeper hole and then getting myself trapped on it
and one thing more
if we were clever we wouldnt be wasting our time arguing with a wall and instead we would be doing anything else like idk? discovering the 119 element on periodic table?
ok how did i loose my argument
the s18
is either the only semi auto ant tank rifle with ten rounds
the only ten round anti tank rifle which is semi auto
the only weapon that comes close is the type 97
which should also be forced to fire when prone
i made a joke that went over everyone head that japan faces germany and thus comparing the s18 to the type 97 is fair
i then said it would be fair to remove the prone requirement after they add the winchester at rifle
how is it fair to buff a rifle after dropping it one br
my first question list one anti tank rifle
belonging to the uss or ussr that is close to the s18
that is semi auto ten round at rifle
but please speak crazy talk, it makes me feel better for my comparative acts of stupidity a fool next to the king of fools
counter arguments by my idiot fans
all br2 weapons are far better, that does not make it a br1 weapon it makes it a weapon without a place
the type 97 is the closest weapon
that would matter if the type 97 did not need a nerf
that would matter if the japanese or the type 97 fought germany
it would be like comparing a german weapon to another german weapon
i will pray for youre mind it is clear at some point you lost it
they could not a find another weapon in the us ussr that had comparable performance to the s18
the only argument is its not good enough for br2
the problem its too good for br1
again i love cherry pickers
no oth semi auto gun has 10 bullets in the mag
no gun is as heavy
the type 97 could be included if i was not asking for it to be nerfed
the allies haver five rounds meaning they have to load twice as often is the reload oof the s18 twice as long no
end of argument
but the most important argument
asking to buff the strongest weapon of its class and br
but please tell me why the poor german s18 need the buff of removing the prone requirement
why the 99 pound gun should be dual wielded
oh and please responded quickly the dopamine hut from you’re genius post is fading
Why are you still on about the fucking Solothurn? This isn’t a post about it and never was. Furthermore comparing the situation of a 4 MAX BP gun to an unlimited TT gun is not something to do. Do you see everyone conplaining about the Koko Rilfe? No, because that’s not the discussion we’re having.
The SVT-38 is minimally worse, 0.3 second longer reload, than the G43, a BR above. It is at least as good as the SVT-40. That is the discussion this post is about.
German gluttons want g43 (svt40 late war copy) to be where svt 38 (1938 gun) is lmao, what next? we need stg44 to be where madsen is? Why cant you accept the fact that german semi auto department was dogshit and move on?
i would prefer all semi autos moved to br3 because they arent br4 material and dont justify having to meet br5 guns spam 95% of the time but hey, let’s gang up on svt because it’s where it belongs
should weapons even have different stats by this logic? why not make them identical? why do people want strenghts and weaknesses of a unique faction? That’s macabre!
i main germany rn, never had an issue with 38, grow up it’s just a single fucking gun, your team is getting ravaged by 2 kvs and you are blabbing about svt having shorter reload, man up, get your mg34 and mow down svt38 users, it’s that simple
Different guns should have different stats. The problem is when a singular gun has the stats of a gun that’s not supposed to be in that spot. The SVT-38 is essentially identical to the SVT-40, yet they are in two different BRs. The Thompsons are similar but each have their own drawbacks and things they are better at. Comparing them to their competition in BR3 and BR4 all guns are roughly at the same level, some are better in certain regions and weaker in others. Yet the SVT-38 simply is better than any other BR3 TT rifle in the game. There’s literally no drawback to using the SVT-48 in BR4 when there should be because it’s not what it’s supposed to be balanced in. Any other gun performs worse when being uptiered but one doesn’t.
Why is there an exception for this single fucking gun when everything else follows the rule? Because it has a magazine? Why don’t all Enfields reload with Mags then?
There are many guns like that in the game, stop pretending it’s a single gun.
Why don’t all Enfields reload with Mags then?
because they weren’t IRL?
svt 38 is an EARLY interwar gun, reloaded with magazines (evident by it’s huge mag well, convenient mag, pouches for mags, convenient mag drop button), almost identical to svt40
It HAD an ability to be reloaded with stripper clips, but was pretty much often used with magazines
German semi auto rifles were terrible, g43 itself is literally an SVT copy
you are literally asking to give germany an ADVANTAGE it shouldn’t have by all accounts because GERMANY SAFFERS, damn soviets had good semi autos so germany should have it too
why don’t we bring down an rd44 to br 3 because, uhm, i dunno, it’s the same as mg34?
or have an is3 at br5 because… reasons
i don’t care much for the enfield, it’s already the best bolt action in the game
you may wanna ask to your
“”
