its not my task to find where you failed
and since i wasnt on that conversation welp 
you may wanna ask to your
since im not one them just pointed out that you are going crazy just like him “” 
“”
1 Like
i will pray for youre mind it is clear at some point you lost it
they could not a find another weapon in the us ussr that had comparable performance to the s18
the only argument is its not good enough for br2
the problem its too good for br1
again i love cherry pickers
no oth semi auto gun has 10 bullets in the mag
no gun is as heavy
the type 97 could be included if i was not asking for it to be nerfed
the allies haver five rounds meaning they have to load twice as often is the reload oof the s18 twice as long no
end of argument
but the most important argument
asking to buff the strongest weapon of its class and br
but please tell me why the poor german s18 need the buff of removing the prone requirement
why the 99 pound gun should be dual wielded
oh and please responded quickly the dopamine hut from you’re genius post is fading
Spoiler
take a little my dear forum user and calm down
Spoiler
https://youtube.com/shorts/4RaewqeODQA?si=ISbFuyhHczjC3d3I
dont do drugs kids its very bad and this video proves it
2 Likes
ah yes, MG34 is so op, it completely counters soviet.
Why are you still on about the fucking Solothurn? This isn’t a post about it and never was. Furthermore comparing the situation of a 4 MAX BP gun to an unlimited TT gun is not something to do. Do you see everyone conplaining about the Koko Rilfe? No, because that’s not the discussion we’re having.
The SVT-38 is minimally worse, 0.3 second longer reload, than the G43, a BR above. It is at least as good as the SVT-40. That is the discussion this post is about.
3 Likes
German gluttons want g43 (svt40 late war copy) to be where svt 38 (1938 gun) is lmao, what next? we need stg44 to be where madsen is? Why cant you accept the fact that german semi auto department was dogshit and move on?
the majority of ppl rather preffer the g41 to have a better reaload time or just get the svt-38 nerfed
is that hard to understand?
3 Likes
The SVT-38 is as strong as the G43, it needs to be nerfed.
Should have made better weapons perhaps?
i would prefer all semi autos moved to br3 because they arent br4 material and dont justify having to meet br5 guns spam 95% of the time but hey, let’s gang up on svt because it’s where it belongs
1 Like
i guess you are talking about a +0 mm matchmaking where if you play br 3 you only met br 3 if you play br 5 you only find br 5
it would be a perfect dream to have that system tbh
Should a weapon in BR3 be at the same level as the weapon at BR4? Why even have them in separate BRs then?
should weapons even have different stats by this logic? why not make them identical? why do people want strenghts and weaknesses of a unique faction? That’s macabre!
i main germany rn, never had an issue with 38, grow up it’s just a single fucking gun, your team is getting ravaged by 2 kvs and you are blabbing about svt having shorter reload, man up, get your mg34 and mow down svt38 users, it’s that simple
yet we still havent seen a single argument for it besides “other guns are reloaded with clips”
so what? that’s literally not an argument
Different guns should have different stats. The problem is when a singular gun has the stats of a gun that’s not supposed to be in that spot. The SVT-38 is essentially identical to the SVT-40, yet they are in two different BRs. The Thompsons are similar but each have their own drawbacks and things they are better at. Comparing them to their competition in BR3 and BR4 all guns are roughly at the same level, some are better in certain regions and weaker in others. Yet the SVT-38 simply is better than any other BR3 TT rifle in the game. There’s literally no drawback to using the SVT-48 in BR4 when there should be because it’s not what it’s supposed to be balanced in. Any other gun performs worse when being uptiered but one doesn’t.
Why is there an exception for this single fucking gun when everything else follows the rule? Because it has a magazine? Why don’t all Enfields reload with Mags then?
1 Like
There are many guns like that in the game, stop pretending it’s a single gun.
Why don’t all Enfields reload with Mags then?
because they weren’t IRL?
svt 38 is an EARLY interwar gun, reloaded with magazines (evident by it’s huge mag well, convenient mag, pouches for mags, convenient mag drop button), almost identical to svt40
It HAD an ability to be reloaded with stripper clips, but was pretty much often used with magazines
German semi auto rifles were terrible, g43 itself is literally an SVT copy
you are literally asking to give germany an ADVANTAGE it shouldn’t have by all accounts because GERMANY SAFFERS, damn soviets had good semi autos so germany should have it too
why don’t we bring down an rd44 to br 3 because, uhm, i dunno, it’s the same as mg34?
or have an is3 at br5 because… reasons
i don’t care much for the enfield, it’s already the best bolt action in the game
…and all of them need to be put in their appropriate place as per BR system. This thread is about a “single gun”…the others will be dealt with soon enough.
5 Likes
Where they fell out.
It’s literally just a magazine. There’s nothing special about it.
Oh no, Magazine pouches! Whoever could come up with that?! Except everyone uses magazine pouches.
It’s again just a mag release. There’s nothing fancy or special about it.
An Advantage? The post is to remove an advantage from a faction, yes. But it isn’t the Germans. The SVT-38 and SVT-40 can not exist at different BRs if they’re identical in stats, which they are.
If that’s your argument we should remove all german items from other TTs. No more captured stuff for anyone. No Panzerfausts for Soviets, no Offenrohrs for anyone but the Germans, remove the premium guerilla squads from the shop, kick out french weapons from the german TT. Good? Obviously it must be.
Ah, yes. The best LMG in the game as an example. Whoever could have that? Maybe it’s the Soviets.
3 Likes
damn the mental gymnastics wehrmacht players come up with to justify another GERMANIA SAFFERS moment, really, instead of arguing with you it’d be appropriate to dismiss it as just another severe case of german players inability to comprehend not being better than any other faction in every single area, no arguments for it besides “other guns do that so this one should too” and strawmanning, not like i expected anything else from someone who complains about an svt38 of all things.
Svt 38 is a direct equivalent of g41, it’s just better because soviets had better semi autos, they’re the same br because they’re matched against one another, the same way 1939 t34 is matched against late 1942 pz4f2 how hard is that to understand?
Or the average german player brain is too rotten after spamming mg13 with drum on br3
1 Like
Honestly I’m all for it. It’s a good way to finally distinguish SVT-38 from SVT-40, making the latter finally somewhat desirable for those moving up the USSR research tree.
2 Likes