Oh goody, three of my most favourite people are arguing with each other…
I really shouldn’t… but… I’ll see what I can do about refocusing this suggestion:
- Adding a scope does not naturally increase the BR of a weapon.
This is just… true…
And before someone has the time to mention the “exception”, moving on to;
- The No. 4 Mk I (T) was BR III long before the new aiming feature was added.
So, claiming that it’s BR III because of it is just ignorance.
Why is it BR III then…? Simple, it reloads a full mag, a single and fast reload, making it a pure upgrade to the regular unscoped version. That was enough to make it and keep it BR III, before the aiming feature was ever a thing.
- Sniper rifles, by their very nature, are extreamly limited.
Who brings a sniper squad when they’re not leveling it, or trying to do a “get X kills with a sniper” mission…?
No one, really. You can at most - in all other cases - bring one per squad, and that sniper then takes the space of another specialist soldier that - in almost all other cases - would have been much better for the squad’s firepower or functionality.
Snipers are, unless the enemy team is braindead, low value only, really only good for long-range harrasment. Harrasment which could just as easily be done with an MG, or just a regular unscoped rifle…
Oh, and every weapon is better if the enemy team is braindead.
Either way, I’ve never known a game to be won because one side had lots of snipers…
- It’s a rare event weapon.
For the fence sitters, this should be the deciding factor. When there’s no clear reason to uptier it (compared to the regular version it just has a scope, that’s not a good reason), taking into consideration it’s inherent nature as a event reward, it certainly deserves enough leeway, anyway.
Enough leeway to keep a scoped version of a TT rifle the same BR as it’s regular variant.
I could go on with how the SMLE is just a downgraded version of the No. 4, too. And whilst that is true, I believe it’s RoF should be buffed so that it’s identical to the No. 4 (and then have the two rifles foldered in the tech tree). Just because people doing accurate Commonwealth loadouts (early UK+Canada, or Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and India all throughout the war,) shouldn’t be unfairly penalised for picking a historical yet underperforming weapon, that by all rights shouldn’t be underperforming.
So, since that’s what I want, I won’t use that factor to push my point.
That is a larping reason/excuse, by the way.
I am just going to point out here that, this weapon isn’t really a good contender for being “the Commonwealth BR II sniper”. It’s a interesting reward, but lets not forget that all SMLE sniper rifles after WW1 were taken out of service, only the P14 (T) remained. So, it’s very much an a-historical weapon.
The top contender for the true, tech tree, historical BR II sniper rifle for the Commonwealth would be the Australian No. 1 Mk III* HT. It’s the only No. 1/SMLE sniper rifle to see service, let alone adoption, during WW2.
Now, compared to the tech tree version of the regular rifle, it would actually be a downgrade, because the centre-mounted scope would prohibit the use of charger clips, and giving it a magazine reload defeats the purpose of implementing a BR II sniper in the first place (then it’d just be a reskinned No. 4 sniper). So, a reload lasting, well… forever, should be enough to disuade any doubters in this instance.
And before anyone chirps up about “the lack of comparative weapons for other factions”, well, we’re all patiently waiting for them.