- Yes
- No
0
voters
no one wants to fight br5 as br4
and no one wants br4 to have extra privlages
so break br 4 and 5 into their own matches
br5 fights br5
br4 fights br4
and everything else plays out as normal
So make BR3 the new BR5, got it
1 Like
Then go all the way to ±0. No more up or downtiers. No half measures
8 Likes
ok on the condition wait times do not increase so you get the ‘leet’ players to add bots without bitching
ass opposed to what br4 becoming the new br5
You’re only making BR3 the new BR5 with this
which is different from making br4 the new br5 how?
BR3 and BR4 has the same type of guns, BR5 brings in guns, jets, and more that BR4 doesn’t have, and BR4 is basically defenseless to BR5 greatly in comparison to BR3 taking on BR4
3 Likes
and br4 is universally better there is no br3 does this better or worse than br4
br4 is a universal upgrade
Not really. A lot of BR IV equipment was downtiered to BR III, so realistically BR IV is just BR 3.5, since most weapons are interchangeable with one another and perhaps the most balanced between BRs out of all the matchmaking combinations.
3 Likes
Great idea but in practice we have too few players therefore queues will be too long, hence why the devs have never done it. They probably want to, but they physically can’t.
2 Likes
how is a 30 round thompson interchangeable with a 50 round
i do agree if we had the player base that 0± would be the goal
but even warthunder cant do a ±1 with 10 brs
The only difference is 20 rounds, and reload times
Yeah, but the 30 round Thompson isn’t fighting the 50 round Thompson, is it? It’s fighting a 40 round Kiraly, which has less damage still than a Thompson. The BAR will always be the let down in the Allies tree, but everything else is pretty competitive.
a two round kill is a two round kill the kiraly is a better thompson bullet for bullet
and BR2 is dead (which… it usually is already but I think that sucks)
They should have tried this a few years ago and, in my opinion, still should. They are afraid it won’t go well (I guess) - so just run it for 1 week or 1 month as a test and see.
1 Like
They absolutely should try it. I’m just trying to come up with a reason as to why they haven’t yet.
No reason to spare BR III from uptiers, the gap between BR IV and III is nowhere near the BR IV - V gap.
3 Likes
What kind of mental gymnastics is this? Combined with your earlier posts, it’s all clear to me now — you love playing US BR III, you’ve got a bunch of premium squads at that tier, and you thoroughly enjoy what this matchmaking gives you. So when someone proposes “isolating BR IV,” you immediately worry that BR IV players will all downmatch into BR III, which would obviously destroy your comfort zone.
And when someone proposes “±0 matchmaking,” you worry you won’t be able to stomp BR II noobs anymore.
Honestly, stop hiding behind that “not enough players” excuse. If what I said above is true, then you are rotten to the core — claiming to speak for everyone, when all you really care about is protecting your own comfort zone. It’s pretty obvious you’re the type who loves crushing other people’s favorite toys.
4 Likes