Then there shouldn’t be a BR4 in your opinion yes?
And who said that they are the same? That’s right, literally only you so far. Make it make sense. At this point, i don’t think talking to you can have any productive outcome whatsoever. You are just repeating the same illogical thing that you came up with over and over again like a broken record.
1 Like
Mmmm, I do say personally that I did go back to BR2 and crushed my opponents on BR3 because the Panzer 4 E/F1 was pretty good with it’s heat shells, but yeah
1 Like
my point is br4 should not have special privalages
br1 is at the bottom it can only be up tiered
br5 is a t the top it can only be down tiered
br 2 3 4
must be uptiered if they can be down tiered
so f br4 wants to face 3 it has to face 5
if br4 can only face br4 and br3 then that is what you are saying otherwise its not fair
if br 3 is not as strong as br4 then why does it only have to face br4 and br3
now lets consider jets and SF rifles, those are something only at BR5 in all TTs
BR5 SUCKS, now if you could get them to remove br5
…sorry was daydreaming
then br4 would be the new br5 as br5 does not exist
no br5 then br 3 vs b4 would not be artificial perk to 4 as br5 does not exsit
we only have 4 brs a 30 percent only in qs
making br-0 possible
BR5 is fun, I play it for the chaos of it all and the hunting of jets for any nation
but this will just move the problem from making 4 unplayable to making 3 unplayable
br5 is a cancer
br5 is korea not ww2
BR5 isn’t cancer, it’s quite fun considering the generosity of jet & tank users providing me with limitless fun shooting them down whether it’s in a Tiger 2 (P), BJ109 G14, or a 20mm anti-air gun in a hill
yes but no one wants to play br4 because they have to fight br5 how is that not cancer
That’s probably not the reason, there’s multiple factors, such as a lack of sufficient BR4 content, BR3 soaking up players like a sponge, BR3 having treasuries of content in comparison and probably more, maybe even that BR4 may not contain enough historical significance in weapons and tanks enough for people
There are exceptions I’ve heard that’s a good tank, haven’t used it but generally speaking BR 2 vehicles are going to be worse off in an uptier vs BR 3 vehicles which get bigger bombs bigger guns like the M18 hellcat or more Armour like a Kv 1 are going to be better off. I’m a BR 3 USA main and most stuff you face in the rare Br 4 uptier is easier to kill (so long as you know how) than rolling up in a wafer thin BR 2 tank or open top and expecting to waste people at BR 3. Also a lot of stuff that was BR 4 has been downtierd to BR 3 (and rightly so) eg M 18 other things should be downtierd like the Narshon which should be moved to BR 3, planes like the Ki 61 should be BR 3 or the Chi-To Late tank should be BR 3. Stuff sits unused because it’s marginal and or overtierd or in BR 4 for a start, some of this stuff won’t budge which is a bummer, but the power gap between 3 & 4 is not a big a 2 & 3 so separating 4 from 5 distributes things better IMO… always gonna be something in the wrong BR or it’s not but it’s just strong and that’s ok (in some cases eg: M8 Scott HE machine BR 2 but wafer armor) so yeah. 
2 Likes
Well yeah, it’s pretty good as long as I don’t meet the KV1, KV2, or Cromwell
2 Likes
but the power gap between 3 & 4 is not a big a 2 & 3 so separating 4 from 5 distributes things better IMO…
bullshit
better for br4 not for br3
+/-0
1
2
3
4
5
Every tier stand alone. Whatever the highest tier weapon you have selected dictates the tier battle youre put in period. No up tier battles. No down tier battles. Just individual tiers, thats it.
This games match making system is like a dog pissing on a tree. Sometimes youre the dog, some times youre the tree. Getting up or down tiered dictates that outcome.
Not everyones going to be happy with my suggestion. But this is what should be done in my opinion to improve the battle system.
1 Like
Bullshit is what you have been trying to here.
How about having an opinion for the better overall game balance instead of mindless shilling for the BR 3? Too difficult for you?
“Wah wah my precious BR 3 shouldn’t face BR 4 coz dat means less BR 2 stomping n more BR 4 games with my already privileged BR 3 therefore BR 4 should forever remain as a punching bag for BR 5”(while conveniently, intentionally forgets about the fact that BR 3 is the BR that has been doing far better in uptier games than any other BR in the game)is exactly how you sounds like. No logic, no objective thinking whatsoever. Just a childish rant about how BR 3 will die if BR 4 stops being a punching bag for BR 5(lol).
2 Likes
Same=X=Close enough
If you can’t understand the differences between them then i think you have to learn what these words mean first.
Also, point it where i said that they are the same. Come on, point it out now. No you can’t, because i never said that they are the same but what i said was they are close enough, more than any other BR +/-1 matches in the game.
BR 1 ↔ BR 2? BR 1 in a massive disadvantage.
BR 2 ↔ BR 3? Yea, everyone have had “enjoyed” fighting KV-1 and Sherman M4A2, XA-38 and whatnot as well as some of the guns that really just belongs to BR 4 while in their BR 2 loadouts.
BR 4 ↔ BR 5 does not even need an explanation.
BR 3 ↔ BR 4 matches are much more fair than the others. You get aircrafts that are evenly matched to the BR 4 aircrafts, sometimes even better than the BR 4 aircrafts actually. You get AT weapons like Panzerfaust 60 that could penetrate every BR 4 tanks frontally without any issues, so many great BR 3 SMG/LMG and even semi-auto rifles like VG 1-5 and Winchester M1907 which has no issues fighting BR 4 weapons. BR 3 tanks generally are in a disadvantage against BR 4 tanks but it’s not as disadvantaged as BR 2 against BR 3 tanks or ofc, BR 4 against BR 5 tanks.
And yet you cry about BR 3 ↔ BR 4 games being more common would kill BR 3? Stop the bullshittery please.
2 Likes
thats no the argument
the argument is br 3 fights br 2 3 4
br 4 would only have to face br 3 4
br3/4 is closer then br4/5
br3 is not equal to br4… full stop
icrease br3 facing br4 and decrease br 2 yes
allowing br4 only to face br 3 and 4 nooooooooooooooooooooo
if br4 gets to avoid br5 it does not get to fight br3 full stop
so many great BR 3 SMG/LMG and even semi-auto rifles like VG 1-5 and Winchester M1907 which has no issues fighting BR 4 weapons
a shame rifles like the g41, johnson 41 and garand and type 4 are exactly level at br3 and shit comparted to the g43 and zh29 or svt38/svt40
now the svt38 thats an op gun that can go to br4
the sherman jumbo is the definition of br3 good armor but a shit cannon
the bar is great exactly at 2 brs 2 and 3 and shit any higher, it be a great br4 5 rfile but shit mg
dont play planes but us planes have decent guns/cannons and bombs or rocket mix no complaints
I would take a M1 Garand or Johnson 41 over a zh29 because of the sights alone
1 Like