thats no the argument
the argument is br 3 fights br 2 3 4
br 4 would only have to face br 3 4
br3/4 is closer then br4/5
br3 is not equal to br4… full stop
icrease br3 facing br4 and decrease br 2 yes
allowing br4 only to face br 3 and 4 nooooooooooooooooooooo
if br4 gets to avoid br5 it does not get to fight br3 full stop
so many great BR 3 SMG/LMG and even semi-auto rifles like VG 1-5 and Winchester M1907 which has no issues fighting BR 4 weapons
a shame rifles like the g41, johnson 41 and garand and type 4 are exactly level at br3 and shit comparted to the g43 and zh29 or svt38/svt40
now the svt38 thats an op gun that can go to br4
the sherman jumbo is the definition of br3 good armor but a shit cannon
the bar is great exactly at 2 brs 2 and 3 and shit any higher, it be a great br4 5 rfile but shit mg
dont play planes but us planes have decent guns/cannons and bombs or rocket mix no complaints
The hell are you even trying to say here? Is this another incoherent rambling of yours that makes zero sense?
In your imaginary fairy worlds?
No, i don’t think so.
By the way, the jumbo sherman with 75mm gun is BR 4, not BR 3. Idk how you supposed to talk about the balance when you don’t even know stuff this basic.
BAR, W.A.R all still works perfectly fine on BR 4. You are delusional if you really think that BAR is ineffective on BR 4 but i wouldn’t be surprised that you actually believe that BAR is shit.
you are correct for the current br4 that has to fight br5 and br3
a br4 that only fights br3 and br4 would have no faults you know thats what i am talking about you sack of shit
Which is different how then what you have been doing
You’re starting argument br5 is too strong for br4/
My starting argument it’s unfair to let a br only down tier that you are just shifting the problem
You’re counter br4 and 3 are comparable you have yet to prove that
The name I gave fits to someone who constantly claims victory without proving it once
I have sworn but you have lied
You said you never once claimed they were equal
Fair but you have dozen of times implied they are
The only way br 4 only vs br4 and br3 is fair is if they br3 and br4 are equal
Anything other than br4 only being allowed to fight gr4 and 3 is if they are equal
They are not
You have so focused on br5 br4 you have lost the plot
If the arguments had stayed the gulf between br4 and 5 is the biggest in the game I agree
If it was between br 2/3 br3/4 is much smaller I agree
If it’s the sad dekusikn br3 and 4 are balanced ahahah ahaha really
Time and time again, i have explained that why BR 3 ↔ BR 4 matches are much more balanced than the other +/- 1 BR differences with the clear examples. But of course, you intentionally ignored all of this and repeated the same bullshit argument over and over again like a broken record which is that the BR 3 is in no match against BR 4. At this point, you are intentionally rage baiting or you have no intention to participate in the conversation with a good faith. Also it is not my fault that you are incapable of objective thinking.
Another bullshittery coming up?
They are close enough or some BR 3 equipment are go toe-to-toe against even BR 4 equipment, that’s what i’ve been saying this entire time but for some reason you are incapable of understanding the differences. Not the first time anyway, right?
I have said they are close
Not close enough to justify be only having to br4 to only face br4 and br3
I see you argument And I disagree
It’s like defining listening
Just because I hear what you say does not mean I have to agree
Listening and agreeing are not the same thing
A sherman and a panther are not close enough
A zh29 and a garand are not close enough
A bar and a 75 round german mg are not close enough
Are they far closer than a fg42 and a bar yes but this is not horse shoes and hand grenades
Again you are so focused on the difference between br4 and br5
You ignore everything else
I see you argument and agree with half of it
Br5 should not face br4
But then br4 should not get to face br3
I understand the argument I disagree
Br4 is close but not close enough to br3
And who decided that? Just you, and even then you haven’t made any sounding argument or examples so far.
Then give me a sounding argument or clear examples to back up your opinions instead of spewing nonsense.
They are close enough and also M1 Garand is not the only semi-auto rifle on BR 3. Are you going to ignore Johnson rifle, SVT-38, VG 1-5n Winchester M1907 etc? In fact, much more evenly matched than the BR 5 SF vs BR 4 semi-auto rifles but ofc you are going to ignore this again in favor of your argument aren’t you?
They are close enough. In fact, BR 3 already have 2 75 rnds LMG and BAR and its variants do perfectly well against them due to BAR and its variants having a very light LMG penalties. Mag size alone does not dictates how the guns are perform. This is why the veteran players often prefers the guns like BAR over other cumbersome LMGs with larger mag sizes.
And you are talking out of your ass just for the sole purpose of shilling for the BR 3.
It is ironic that you claims that me ignores everything else.
Oh okay then. Let’s super nerf all BR 3 stuff that are great like KV-1, Sherman and the guns like 30 cal Thompson etc etc so BR 2 can breath much easily which is fair right? Then you have a deal.
The svt38 is just plain broken it’s a br4 rifle in br3
How is reloading the same exact magazine in 2/3 the time balanced
No how about you give an example of a br4 gun that is balanced I have given numerous examples of them not being
Wait you mean how the g41 and johnson are close enough but german players won’t shut up about it
Because the g41 is as balanced to the johnson as the johnson is balanced to the zh29
I have never once said br4 and 5 are balanced
I have simple said neither are br4 and 3 balanced enough to justify letting br4 only face br4 and br3
Either br4 faces everyone it faces now or only br4
the difference is br3 has to fight br4
where in this situation br4 would only have to fight br4 and br3
of course if you only hae to play a weaker br you need to be nerfed
Already gave you a ton.
You just ignored them all and your “numerous examples” are literally and objectively, bullshit.
I think you actually have no idea what you are talking about nor have a proper concept of how the guns are fairing in their repsective BR.
Inb4 this guy is going to ignore all of this again and keep spewing nonsensical things like how M1 Garand can’t even hold a candle to ZH-29 As his “numerous examples”.
ok lets take this one at a time
what does a garand do better than a zh29
rate fo fire nope
magazine nope
damage ow wow zh29 takes two shots to kill
no it does not its a higher number without meaning
accuracy wait they both have amazing accuracy
a zh29 reloads in a fraction of the time and a bigger magazine
so please tell me what, ok one thing a garand can full reload at any time thats it the start and end what a garand does better
yeah us planes are great look back i have said that twice
yeqah a bar is accurate not four times as accurate
so point out any garand superiority and dont use damage
How about we comparing it with other semi-auto rifles then? No, you won’t because you know damn well that they are very much comparable to the BR 4 semi-auto rifles. That’s why you are latching on M1 Garand so much. Stop the BS argument.
You know what, actually i think M1 Garand could be better because US doesn’t fight the body armors so in this context, M1 Garand has more generous one shot capabilities than ZH-29 at range.
Ok maybe because the rifle is the standard
Bar vs mg34
12 damage 800rpm 75 round mag vs
12 damage 600rpm 20 magazine
Guess which one is br3 and which br4
its a good thing the bar can kill 4 soldiers with one hit amazing allied technology
