is 2 1944 can pen the hull cheeks directly on thanks to its angle performance, and it has enough tnt equivalent to usually kill the crew in the super structure
1 Like
normal is 2 can as well but its less consistent of a one shot
1 Like
I dont think there is a difference between 10m and 100m for almost all tanks.
Not noticable at least. I think the only example I can think off the top of my head is Pershing APHE vs King Tiger, since it pens exactly 180mm so you can technically destroy them at point blank range
1 Like
Which funnily enough is a faction specifc perk of USSR in warthunder.
Better penetration chance against angles. No reason to assume it wasnt ported over aswell.
If you look at the tank closely, you’ll realize it can’t be killed that way. The main crew and ammunition are located behind 200mm of armor on the turret.
At the very least, the developer should separate the cosmetics into cosmetic and functional ones, so everyone can see that the helmet and cuirass provide something.
It’s still not a bulletproof vest. A steel chest plate, if you will.
1 Like
Ah yes, i forgot that apparently forum only consists of posts and no replies or likes. Not to mention forum is not the only place suggestions are made
4 Likes
And yet, it’s telling. You yourself don’t really want to bother with thinking through proposals.
The best you can say is:
If it doesn’t affect anything, it should be removed. LOL.
It’s incredible how one can speak and read yet neither tell or understand
I have multiple posts, replies, a spreadsheet and a video talking about how it is affecting more thresholds than one might realize. If you didn’t catch any of this then the conversation is pointless
But please, feel free to point out where I have said that the body armor doesn’t affect your game
8 Likes
This isnt an argument for the removal of the damage reduction - this is a proof of your bias, because you defending an unfair advantage by claiming it has no effect is completely illogical.
2 Likes
By continuing to try to argue your lowering people’s value of ur opinion in general. Eventually no one will take you seriously for anything.
5 Likes
This is pretty much just your argument, while others have now numerous times provided stats, numbers and apparently theres even a video of how the bodyarmor affects the game.
And this is the sane people argument, yes its cosmetic that gets benefit → obviously the bonus needs to be removed.
7 Likes
and yet, this is your first argument.
1 Like
So, you claim that this affects gameplay, and significantly so, so it needs to be removed.
I claim that it has minimal or no impact on gameplay. Therefore, we can leave it in place for now, or change nothing.
Quite logical.
Guys, we’re talking about hundredths of a second.
Does this have an impact? Absolutely. But that’s where your evidence ends. You’re simply saying, “It has an impact,” “I don’t like it,” so let’s remove it.
1 Like
Why do you think this matters to me? We’re talking about computer games on a forum, you know, DAMN GAMES. This isn’t world politics, not a forum about saving the world from universal evil. I think you’re being a bit dramatic.
3 Likes
It also affects german weapon damage values. They are artificially increased to compensate. If you’re okay with reducing damage of your guns to remove the body armor then that’s fair. Otherwise it just favors germany like everything else y’all vote for
1 Like
So anyone who losses to me is a Even worse noob
X D guess is fair and i got a new way to blame people and specially the fucking soviet teams
Think whatever You want but germans and japanese playerbase are still proving that no matter if they are handicaped or enemy have Best gear they Will still crush them no matter what sice they got the most important stuff that their enemies don’t have (common sense, rallies and a funcional brain)
4 Likes