The current ROF is unrealistic, and makes the gun hard to use gameplay wise. It is more likely that the gun has a ROF closer to 600-700. So, bringing it to 660 would be good, as it originally had.
- Yes
- No
0
voters
1 Like
I’ve still yet to see the document that says it had a rof of 1100
1 Like
Guys, why not lol?
3 Likes
Cuz there’s already options like that in the tech tree so it would just be boring
2 Likes
It kinda defeats the purpose of a event weapon, if it isn’t good to use. And, if the AVSS 36 rof gets changed for realistic purposes, then I don’t see why the same won’t apply for this weapon.
1 Like
woah, 50% reject? Why lol? You LIKE the 1000 rof?
1 Like
Would you call the liberator a bad event item? Not everything needs to be meta or good. Just fun. Being good is only one of the ways to achieve this.
I make the case that the Fedorov (25) ought to have a lower ROF, that is because the weapon actually had a lower ROF in reality. The gameplay complements the weapons handling. So, unless players who use the weapon, like the way it is, I see no reason why the rof is 1100.
- I doubt players prefer the 1100 because it would otherwise be “too boring”.
- The onus is on someone to bring facts which demonstrate otherwise that the rof is 1100.
In fact, it is more likely than not that players would enjoy a Fedorov which doesn’t shoot faster than the mg 42 (chuckle). I would greatly enJOY it.
The recoil handling should be similar to the AVS 36 (lol).
If it is true that ‘specialty/ non-meta’ should be introduced to the game, then the devs would never have removed the burst fire for -certain weapons-, and go all COD.
I’ll make you an offer. I also would accept if the MG 42 has a higher rof, like it realistically had. I must be consistent with my principles after all.
3 Likes
Mg42 is the primary machine gun of Germany in high tier so an entirely different matter where balance is much more important. I understand you point on how some people may enjoy the change u suggested. Me personally I prefer the current iteration so will still vote that way. But will acknowledge that that’s not from an objective matter. But rather personal opinoon
1 Like
The FEDOROV Rifle is on track to being the best gun the Soviets have which is hard since they already have the largest selection of guns that sit in meta.
Yea i enjoy it allot as it is right now and i will even more when they basically remove the visual recoil.
Visual recoil is when the sight change/move off target more than the actual recoil. This gun currently has worse practical vertical recoil than the mg 81 lol.
The vertical is no issue at all man just pull down i have no problem using it.
I’m against it, this thing is funny, it’s pointless to use it as an effective weapon, but as effective it is, it’s very funny, as if you have an ordinary self-loading rifle with a broken trigger mechanism that caused it to start shooting continuously and uncontrollably.
And the current rate of fire is probably chosen based on the theoretical possibility of such a mechanism firing rapidly, you just need to compare the mechanism of the avtomat Fedorov and the Fedorov rifle and draw conclusions from this as to how different they are (well, considering that the Fedorov 25 rifle should at least have a trigger mechanism changed)
I don’t use the Fedorov rifle at all other then maybe as a back up weapon because I don’t like the vertical recoil it has. Even in short controlled bursts, I have to aim for the enemies knee caps just to make sure I get one or two bullets on target before the rest of the ammo flies over his head. 
IMOP, the gun sucks at 1,100 ROF, but I don’t personally care if they leave it because I am quite happy using the AVT 40-20, and the AVS-36 as a backup for Radiomen. So leave it, change it, I don’t care. 
1 Like
Leave it - its super powerful, but very hard to control.
Thats unique gameplay.
2 Likes
Its what the gun historically had. So yes!
Back when it had burst I used it a lot cause when fired in bursts the recoil is quite controllable. Now you just have to fire in bursts on your own.
Historical accuracy should always come first!!!
