Historical accuracy must come first
1 Like
The problem is fire rate has no historic accuracy since theoretical and actual fire rate are two different things majority of guns in Enlisted has theoretical fire rates xD
We need the actual fire rates
1 Like
Then Germany is RIP STG will have 500(100-120 if we gonna be full realism) and FG 42 250 RPM … xD you can make a suggestion see how it goes good luck 
Fun/gameplay >>>>> historical accuracy
Historical accuracy is fun gameplay.
Sure when we gonna give all weapons realistic rate of fire and not theoretical and when are you fixing my bombs 
We’re kinda past that point with ho ri prototype, t99, t24, su-9, etc etc etc.
Historical accuracy needs to be consistent across the board in order to enjoyable. Current enlisted is little better than battlefield. So I strongly disagree
The current enlisted is a shit show. We have post war shit, prototypes in the TT, inaccurate weapons, and the stupid Halloween squads!
The 6.5 mm version of this weapon would later become the Fedorov Avtomat. Considering that the experimental 7.62 mm versions of the Fedorov Avtomat also had a rate of fire of about 600 rounds per minute, this weapon should also have the same rate of fire. But definitely not 1000 rounds per minute.
3 Likes
Well from 3 burst fire they turned it to MG 42 in a rifle variant xD I wonder how many times the devs will change it until it becomes a normal weapon xD
1 Like
There should also be a 15-round magazine there 
.
1 Like
Well I mean they can change it as they like its event weapon after all its not even gold order.
1 Like
Its having its firing recoil changed upcoming patch,
why dont you wait until then to call for changes?
- bayonet coming (more recoil control?)
Right now rifle is bad but different. In the test server the changes appeared quite noticeable. I suspect ill be quite fine after the update.