Don’t waste your time with this guy, the same guy who claims to get 70+ kills per life with sturmpanzer II at BR5. The reality is that he sucks even at greyzone camping and struggles to even get 20 kills against console players. He gets triggered by mkb15 because he is the guy who regularly brings it to BR5 matches, got slammed every time against actual players, but still somehow manages to build up a false sense of superiority.
Quite opposite to a lack of imagination, he lives in his own little world and comes to the forum to show off his exceptional game sense that you normies couldn’t comprehend.
2 Likes
If the Mkb.42(H) fully automatic carbine were moved to a lower matchmaking system, its magazine capacity would need to be further reduced from the current 15 rounds to the historically tested 10-round magazine capacity; otherwise, this would disrupt the overall game balance of the lower matchmaking system.
1 Like
Please forgive my bluntness, but the 10-round test magazine version of the Mkb.42(H) was an experimental model from the factory, only its initial magazine capacity was very small. Its purpose was to verify the feasibility of the later STG-44 fully automatic assault rifle, not a semi-automatic weapon like the M1 carbine.
There is a difference between ahistorical and impossible
That MKB is visually using the 10 rounder mag - but it magically fits 5 more rounds.
They went the double lazy way, they used something that existed and implemented it wrong, instead of inventing something new.
Either make a 10 rounder fit 10rounds, or create a new model of a magazine and make it visually bigger.
Which one is T20 or hyde ?
Just out of curiosity how those teleported to europe.
This insanity keeps me awake at nights as well, moroccans could have swam from africa to shores of normandy during d-day totally possible.
First and foremost it should get rid of the fictional 15-round mag to the real 10-round mag.
Then we can start talking about BR changes.
4 Likes
no
but mkb42 from tech tree should be moved to br4
2 Likes
Gameplay and balance should only be adjusted within reasonable historical/aunthentic/immersive boundaries.
Adding Su-9 1946 to Soviets because they didn’t have a jet or Ho-Ri from 2017 to Japan because they never made a IS-2/KTH/Pershing equivalent is simply insanity and not “balance”.
3 Likes
adding jets was a mistake, the only jet should’ve been a 262 with no bombs
idk about BR4, but Germany is defo lacking in the SMG / Assault rifle BR4 area. Only thing is the Kerali, which, when against other nations, is kinda mid
1 Like
mkb 42 at IV will be very historical and gameplay good, they could also put avs 36 there, just nerf their accuracy/rof or something, there’s absolutely no reason for germany to have like 4 same assault rifles on br5 in same line
1 Like
It objectively is balance. That’s just a wrong statement lol
Finally a sane take. Yes I could get behind them changing the model
too bad a 15 round Mkb mag doesn’t exist
3 Likes
Once again: balance outside of WW2 is not “balance”, it’s fictional parity.
2 Likes
Good thing it’s a video game
Look up what the word balance means
So let me get this straight: you would rather only some nations have jets and king tiger level tanks then trying to balance it out? What a schizo take
I would rather only the faction that built King Tigers have them and none have jets. Thinking everyone built them is the schizo take
What if no nation had jets or king tigers.
1 Like