Can you add at least a little matchmaking?
It is absurd when in one battle your team is with mkb, pz 3j, mp35\1, but the enemy team is with 1907 mosin and t60, and in the next battle, on the contrary, your team is with kar98k and mp 28, but the enemy is with ppsh, ptr and t50.
New players will not be able to accept the complete superiority of the enemy, and they obviously will not like easy victories either…They just won’t play next time.
I don’t like it when one team has players with a level no higher than 10, and the other has 2-3 players with a bonus and a level of 30, this is absurd.
A player with the 30th campaign level must have a similar opponent (for example, level 26-32).
Although it is necessary to balance the number of slots somehow, but this will obviously never happen.
You can say about online, but if there is not at least some balancing of 20-30 levels, then there will definitely be no higher online (however, I am against the fact that 30 levels cannot meet the first levels and the like, it will be even more absurd).
8 Likes
they should improve gun pick up system and viable to fill ammo on friendly guns and enemy guns refilled by their engineer built ammo crates.
4 Likes
It’s a little off topic, but I agree.
It would be nice if it were possible to take ammo for enemy weapons from an enemy ammunition box.(given their rarity, it would not be unbalanced).
2 Likes
sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. what can you do about it? level up harder, either by playing longer or shekels.
1 Like
Personally, there are no problems for me, I can play better with a standard rifle than players with ppsh, but it will be worse for new players and they will simply leave, and this is not profitable for both you (the player) and the developers.
And it gets on your nerves when your team is from beginners, and the enemy is from “veterans”, and in the next fight everything is the opposite, because it would be possible to combine these two fights into a more balanced 2 matchs.
It is impossible to balance skills, but it is possible to balance by level.This will reduce the number of games that cause thoughts about deleting the game.
1 Like
We don´t even have enough people to fill lobbies as is. Proper matchmaking is something we should be talking about when the game leaves OBT.
1 Like
And this does not prevent the game from first placing players of maximum levels in one team, newcomers in another, and then vice versa in one maximum levels, newcomers in another.
YES, THERE IS NO ONLINE.In Moscow, it is quite good, 5vs5 quite happens.
1 Like
it is on topic since the problem is higher end weapons and this could improve it without ruining MM time.
We are waiting for the opportunity to hijack an enemy tank and plane, then AT rifles will be useful)) Will not need ruining MM.
More a balance issue than a matchmaking issue imo.
Poor game design to be creating too great of an equipment gap.
2 Likes
I wouldn’t add any mm restrictions. Because I find matchs where you always face the exact same thing depending on what you yourself have to be exceptionally boring.
However.
Devs mentioned some time ago that custom matchs will be a thing. So it’d be absolutely fine to add lvl restrictions in custom matchs, just not in “vanilla” ones.
Eh,you not understand me.
I not about t 50 need fight only against pz 3 j.
I about t 50 not must fight vs team where only pz 2 and pz 3 b.
It’s exactly what I said though.
I wouldn’t touch mm, because I like the unexpected. I don’t mind enemies having bigger vehicles, I just find a way to counter them by other means.
But with upcoming custom matchs, ppl who afraid of challenges could play in custom matchs restricting lvls, thus having teams fighting with same stuff.
I also like unexpected fights, but not when it’s beginners versus already experienced players, because of this, the fight turns into a beating of one side to the other.(it doesn’t matter if I’m for the winners or not, but it’s boring and annoying anyway).
… wich is why it could be an option for custom matchs.
Also restricting vanilla matchs will remove options and will mean all regular matchs to get boring, to face the same stuff everytime depending on your lvl.
So no mm for regular vanilla matchs
But
Yes mm and lvl restrictions for custom ones.
Imagine the “joy” of Normandy players around lvl 20 ish. The only vehicles they’d see would be jumbos, and pz4. Nothing else (not accounting premiums) or those in end game lvls: only panthers and the new usa td. Just thinking about it is nauseating.
How many times to talk about it?
I am totally against limiting levels, it will be absurd when only t50 or jumbo, panthers are riding on the battlefield.
I’m talking about the fact that,if one team have player 30 lvl, another team should have a similar level of player.
1 Like
Aaah!
You mean a BALANCE of TOTAL COMBINED lvs, not mm per lvl!
Yes, that I would be up to. In fact I suggested something similar before.
Hooray, you finally understood, although I can speak badly, I’m too sleepy and tired.
1 Like
Don’t worry, it’s often my case as well. I work around 10-12 hours everyday, I’m burnt…
1 Like
I think you’re wrong on one point. New players will very much appreciate easy victories. This is a selling point, or at least one that (to new players) is attractive.
They will accrue XP faster and easier. If we’re honest no one likes long drawn out wins.