It isnt exactly a nuclear reactor, somehow, they however managed to make by far more drums than they did guns.
No, lewis gun comes first in mind.
Another technically springloaded but not in same sense as stickmags is the tommy drum, where the spring tension rotates the internal mechanism that advances the rounds.
This is also the mag that is responsible for ppl thinking all drum mags rattle.
Ive had the pleasure to carry both AK bananana mags as well as M37’s.
If I got to choose id rather not carry either one.
Finns had actually completely opposite experience.
Regardless they also eventually made some stick mags, what came to reliability nothing was on par with the original drum.
As side note, the soviets as well quit the production of stick mags for ppsh41 while drums remained in production to ~1950?
However, sovjets did increase the steel thickness on drums.
As sidenote, the margin of user error is obviously present in drum mags since you do can wind too much or too little.
But this also isnt exactly rocket science. Winding explained below.
Spring sure, friction ? Not really, theres grooves on magazine where the cartridges moves rather freely, even on outer ring theres stamped grooved to minimize the contact. Unlike sten magazine for example, that had flat surfaces.

Theres “ratchet” mechanism in that makes quite distinctive click when winding it.
If I recall the correct spring load was 8 clicks for 68-71 load aka full load.
If I recall some soviet drum mags had “fake” rounds on end of the spring preventing “over” filling as well as helping to push the last rounds to gun. Could be PPd38/40 mag.
Finns however never had issues with it however the common load was about 67-69 rounds rather than absolute full capacity 71.
So to clarify, there was no issues after figuring out that magazine should not be loaded to absolute full capacity. Which, I think happened already before the war.
even rather small climb makes differency of point of impact in meters at 50 - 100m.