I use assault engineers only on 2 br. bcs i have 6 mkb 35. I dont need it on 4 br.
I realized that youâre not really that knowledgeable about this xD
No questions for you.
If youâre talking about the bias of German players, fine, Iâve actually maxed out everything.
But even here, you donât really know much, alright.
I use mine in every br5 loadout. Itâs lesser firerate compared to fg42 goes further, itâs much more accurate with recoil. Itâs strong in a different way, and most importantly, itâs literally impossible for everything to be best in slot and just downtiering something to make it best in slot or to gain attributes that in a br that wouldnât have that is not the right approach.
Terrible suggestions.
Just bring back original burst fire mode. The reason people bought the weapon in the first place.
Well, maybe itâs good with crossplay off, but if you think about it and dig into the datamine, then no.
If weâre talking about enemy armor, it gets EVEN WORSE.
Time to kill is very low.
The lowest.
Of all of them.
It canât be competitive.
What are you talking about? Should i show you pictures of my games played,win rates, that i have all 4 trees completed, that i have a few hundred bp guns, that i have 60 premmy squads with around 30 of them being for germany?
Well, you know perfectly well that they wonât do that. And the only thing you can do with it is either buff it, slightly nerf it, or, as you said, drop it even lower. Or a third optionâit stays just as useless as it is now.
Buddy, i only play in pc matches. Console only lobbies are boring AF
Itâs no surprise though germany players want to break more rules for themselves and no one else
same question 4 you
ok you can send it.
So what, I spent $1,000 at my regional prices on this game, which would be $2,000 at EU/US prices.
And so what?
yeah, i know.
Point is youâre trying to tell everyone they donât know because they donât have as much stuff as you. Point is, I do, and itâs a b.s. excuse to try and shut people up. Then you tried to use a comparison with the gun being on assault engineers as if you didnât even know theyâre classified as automatic rifles in game and not assault rifles.
Im a Soviet Main 
You must trust me give us your body armor xD
If you want to stay silent, you can stay silent, but donât make things up or speak on my behalf.
No, I said that this weapon is comparable to an assault rifle.
In terms of damage and rate of fire, it absolutely cannot compete with any other weapon of the same class.
First of all.
Second, go check the datamined table yourself.
10 damage not equal 15.3
yes, i should swap the pps43s for 41s.
but i found my self loving the breda 30.
partially inspired to guards motorized infantry
well, most stuff changed over the years, itâs the nature of games.
and imo, shouldnât be outright better than other items to become too closely a pay to win.
Iâm saying, you daft rock, that comparing it to a weapon that is not useable by literally anyone but Assault Engineers who can actually use the Kurz is nonsense. âItâS a WoRsE StGâ That doesnât very well matter if no one that can use the Kurz can use the Stg. Let me just use the weapon that is not available instead of one thatâs not optimal.
IMOP with the killing power of the Soviet RMN-50 and Japanese Ariska, they could realistically be BR5.
Gameplay wise - if it doesnât one hit kill, its not a select fire rifle.
Gameplay logic is what should apply here.
Its either a semi auto rifle, a SMG, a MG or a AR.
Just because it is available to troopers doesnât make it a SFR.
Does that make the Armaguerra not a semi auto either?
Comparing it to a weapon not of the same class is stupid because that affects nothing. The STG-44 is better but one class can use it when everyone but them can use the Kurz. Itâs like comparing the BAR and the Gewehr 41. Want to compare it to ARs? Suggest it be changed to one
Um, akshually, thatâs fungus not a rock.
Armaguerra is a worthless piece of junk - unless fighting US.
