On the radial menu, where you can pick the squad formation/ request healing or ammo/ there is an option to place up to 3 propaganda posters on walls. It will just be a blank space if you can’t.
lots of things has been said.
but no, i suspect open beta will be in about 4/5 months-ish. as we still have to test that said campaign, and above all, a newer progression system to test for us. and than, opportunites for an open beta could be open.
don’t mark my words as those are my opinions. but it wouldn’t be logical having an open beta with not all the campaing promoted ready to be delivered and done.
would be nice if they hurry up, have the Beta crowd test too, ya know
i disagree.
a rushed and unpolish game delivered in open beta it would massacre it’s initial review and future upcomes.
already in the lives of streamers and people this game doesn’t have a good rep.
this is why they might redeem their selves with the new progression system.
and it wouldn’t be consistent if people doesn’t have the chance to try the tunisia campaign.
after all, that’s what the game offers. as such, it requires it’s time, dedition, and above all, work.
making a bad blow now it’s the least thing enlisted needs right not.
1 Like
Agreed, if currently delivered Enlisted enters OBT, we can slowly start preordering shovels and gravestone. There is still a lot of polishing work or changing mechanics before it can be safely assumed, that DEVs won´t regret going in OBT.
Likkeeee whaaaaat? Sorry, but this is total bull*.
Going youtube, enlisted, sort by views, fresh and one 1 week ago with 500.000+ views, 20.000 likes, 379 dislikes, positive review talking about good and bad things.
If you want to join these dislikes and a be n.380 - no one is really going to miss these people.
look at twitch?
during the drop streamers clearly stated their thoughts looking at the most cancerous things by showing the worst part of this game.
figure
and ammount of people that played this game or never even touched b4, agreed.
example?
the european canadian, jeadClonWatch ecc.
it’s not like, 1 or 2 individuals.
if you can’t see the truth. i’m afraid you are pretty much blind.
I have already looked what i think is right to look on to provide a proof of argument. If you want to provide a proof of your argument - do it yourself. And then you could also additionally explain why warthunder streamers or people actually not interested in shooters are more important than potential 20.000 customers pressing ‘i like’ button.
exept, they might are there for the streamer, not the actual game.
thats why it says
who are still watching the game and press i like it
which it’s not the fully potential because for the same reasons, insthead of 500k people, we might only get 20ks.
i’m not good in math, but seems neither you.
It only means from 500.000 only 20.350 took part in a vote. You’ll never know how much you get from it.
which it’s close to almost nothing!.
this is why if we can make this product better without obvius micro and rng we could actually get houndreds of more.
think about it. people are here to play a game, not gambling around and waste time on something that they might not get.
which, if you notice in the russian forum, and english as well, people really desperated wanted a new progression system which it’s what we are getting in the next updates. or a close future.
This is a hater argument, based on assumptions and personal preferences. We were discussing public opinion about this game, and public opinion based on this particular video is clear - 20.000 likes, 350 dislikes.
exept it’s not.
because if i was an hater. i would have abandon this game from long time.
which i didn’t, because i hope in this product, and if i can help, i’ll do that.
isn’t what we all do for giving a proper mark?
and we saw the results…
don’t get me wrong, this game it’s not 100% bad like many people claims.
but the problem is that the main point of the game it’s bad at the point that you like, or you despise it. no middle ways.
i would say 40% in a personal opinion.
Can you provide a name of successful fps title to make a direct ratio comparison? A title that you think is the most right to compare with enlisted or maybe direct competitor.
and here’s what i don’t get of you people.
why does enlisted has to be something similar to something else?
comparison are the worst thing for a newer game. it should be something better. not something worst. ( and new )
and i somewhat see and agree with you that enlisted does not have direct competitor under certain circumstances. but again, that’s not the point.
It shouldnt, but you just claimed 20.000 of potential customers from 500.00 view is bad. In fact - i took another example (valorant) and it seems the ratio is just exactly where it should be. Valorant isnt the best example, but generally it a point for an argument.
than you confirm that microtransations should be in skins rather than equipment…
…
which again, if it would be like that, it would bring at least 50 if not 70% more of people
also, why is that a competitor… it has nothing to do with that. ( thankfully ) and " numbers " of players isn’t a major point.
like, people play vaolroant because they like it. and that’s all.
you get in the game, and you play. you don’t have to think about bullshits or pay for any bullshits aside from cosmetics.