We would have working bipods and not half assed bipods we have now. Another reason to hate that game.
30 Likes
Was it worth it Gaijin? I don’t think so you just wasted time and money on a failed and very late not hyped not anticipated project that doesn’t interest average player that already got tired of playing Tarkov it’s like launching BR game in 2020 or Dota/LoL clone in 2017.
4 Likes
It says “Our future plans”
So it probably won’t ever happen. Just like with Enlisted.
7 Likes
if active matter didnt exist the money would go to warthunder or investors not enlisted, besides the money came from warthunder not enlisted
That’s not quite true. Many former devs and even other staff are now working on AM and its community.
For example, Enlisted’s lead CM is lead CM for AM as well.
It’s obvious they’re neglecting Enlisted in favor of AM.
13 Likes
It’s better to invest money on Warthunder than on obvious failed project like Active Matter. Enlisted must now look like a goldmine when compared to their late to the party extraction shooter than nobody was hyped about. Money also came from Enlisted as we also spend a lot of money. Gaijin killed Dark Flow and forced (now Gaijin employees) their devs to make new game, or leave company.
6 Likes
And with things like this I’m sure the devs when they come crawling back to enlisted I’m sure they’ll be so happy to greet the community and the game they left to die.
AM has such a small community. They straight up shutdown its forum and send all players to discord.
Or they will get ultra mad and fire most of devs and only leave skeleton crew as we have right now in Enlisted.
3 Likes
Yep and for some reason the only thing they can ever seem to focus on is appeasing the Soviets and the allies for short term victory instead of focusing on the long term.
So I guess when the game finally flops I can greet the traders when they come back.
There not selling active matter to gamers there selling it to investors, it’s not about making money it’s about increasing there portfolio. Its about promising infinite profits to people who dont understand how the industry works. If Big business worked the way a small business did unified would have closed with skull and bones. Yeah a few thousand spending a few thousand is a few million or what warthunder makes a month
2 Likes
Well, depends on what they define as functional.
3 Likes
I still have no idea why this game is exist, never searched for it, never looked for it, but saw 1 video from “admiral starks” few months ago and managed to watch for a few minute just to see what kind game it is and safe to say, as a enlisted player that game did not hyped or interested me… I hope it fails miserably just like enlisted lol
5 Likes
To make post WW2 infantry assets in preparation for WT’s infantry gamemode.
do they really need AM for it? Im not playing WT and never played before but didn’t they used enlisted assets to add infantry during one of their events? so they should be able to do exact preperation with enlisted? right?
It’s not about need. They just want to milk those assets upfront.
Enlisted was most likely the same case. And it is possible that it will eventually be imported into WT as WW2 part of the infantry gamemode. Enlisted’s maps have already been datamined from WT files.
And since those games at least share same accounts, I hope we don’t lose our progress. And it’s going to be merged with progress from WT.
4 Likes
i have a theory.
Active matter is the test child like cousine royale was for enlisted.
but perhaps for something else.
i mean, look at the prices.
again, perhaps just empty chatter and all conspiracy, but AM has more map assets than enlisted.
( well, somewhat duh )
and has already a 1/3rd weapons amount in a short time span compared to enlisted.
so, they are cooking for something a bit beyond than this… well ugh… questionable game.
although i can’t deny the PVE is appealing for me 
3 Likes
Just read my post above.
i really doubt that will be the case.
the tech is not the same.
the engine works differently.
and worse, it would add ton “wasted” space that most people won’t play.
war thunder gameplay does not work in enlisted if we use our maps.
and infantry gameplay will be bad on war thunder maps with nothing of cover at all.
would be easier for them to make an infantry based game with squads elements in modern settings.
but even there, it’s questionable.
although looks like they will most certainly try.
due to the footage being recorded from AM.
turns out that map is from AM, vehicles are also from AM, and the AK is one of the standard weapons given from one of the packs. with the same attachments.
( FYI; i do not own AM. but from the gameplay and trailers, i could see many similarities to be just coincidences )
1 Like
Obviously the infantry focused gamemode would share maps with legacy GB (tank game mode)
Just like GB doesn’t share maps with AB or ships.
Plus, one could say ships are waste of space as well.
TTs do not have to be shared. You can already use the aircraft in GB (tank game mode). There can be seperate infantry focused tree.
It already has been announced the day before April Fools. And leaks that are in support of infantry game mode in WT are consistently reappearing.
2 Likes