Soviet side matters

We do not need that 'cause if it’s added we’re going into the Cold War and that’s a bit much.

Pick an argument, either;

  • “Breadth of choice is good, don’t ask about their viability.”

or,

  • “What options are actually worth using?”

You can’t do both.

2 Likes

I don’t want him because of this

True but with who’s in charge I think we’re going there unless we fight and kick and scream to not go there.

I did not spot an axis way - a lot of good weapons, a lot of variety. Can I choose it?

And thanks to this topic existing I have a feeling we’re gonna merge with War Thunder soon.

However, in principle, the reaction to the quite reasonable remark is that the Soviet side has only 2 paratroopers, only one of which can be obtained for free, and it is very difficult.

And the fact that of 5-6 squadrons for other faction is continuing causes a reaction that looks little like an adequate one.

In fact, this explains a lot and such obvious imbalances, no matter how hard you try to pretend that it doesn’t exist, it does, and it absolutely violates any principles, any balance, any common sense.

1 Like

Going by your logic, you have 10 choices for BR II SMGs.

You should be overjoyed ad the disproprortionate attention your main faction has been given, Germany only ever has so many choices due to campaigns mergering.

Soviets had way less campaigns to merge overall compared to the multitudes for Germany (including a subfaction representing a seperate major nation of the war, so not many of them are even “German”).

4 Likes

25 vs 10 - not such a fair deal

But it’s not a matter of quantity, it’s quality.

1 Like

Just add reskins to the TT so that you can shut up. If you need them to be worse for flavor than just say the recoil spring broke and you got new flavorfull content.

1 Like

so do the Soviet ones with any gold weapon order or event weapon they can put on their Paratroopers.

But overall can you stop moaning on about the German ones because we got a lot of trash and nerfed stuff while the Soviets haven’t really been touched.

Don’t get me wrong, he really should replace his avatar with something other.

He contradicts historical reality which I have already presented and proven - body armor be capable of stopping bullets, pistols, machine guns, and rifles from various distances.

Well, this person has their own perspective, and they have long since become Vika from the European forum rather than Veekay, who defended Stalingrad against the Tigers.

1 Like

25 mid guns vs 10 op guns, not a fair deal.

3 Likes

It’s our fault for fighting on multiple fronts maybe Russia could have done the same and we wouldn’t be in this situation.

A ppk? A rescin of pps - ppsh-2? Ahah non of them close to mp-41, even mp-28 extended

21 vs 10*

  • 2 of whom can no longer be gained by any means
  • 1 is just a straight up cosmetic change (not even different stats as opposed to PPS-42 and 42 Red)
  • 8 of which belong to a subfaction, they deserve unique guns too.

Considering that the Axis represent TWO countries, a only 50% disparity between the Axis and the Soviets is entierly understandable, and desireable.


Also leaving out that about half are already not worth using, as there are straight upgrades for them, that do exactly the same thing but better (MP 38 vs 40, all the various Beretta models, etc).

5 Likes

Don’t you even start with the body armor nonsense because if you are in that situation you most likely have a broken rib or be incapacitated and he has done his best to put up with half the nonsense the developers have been putting him through.

Unobtainable and insanely rare, point not valid, try again.

4 Likes

It’s the point that it existed which he’s moaning about So we can have rare one-of-a-kind items and that will add to his argument.