pure BS when almost all nations are equalized in all things except couple of exceptions.
US having p47 with overwhelming firepower(BR5)
germans having slight edge with tiger II and auto snipers(BR5 and they suck and almost no people use them)
japan lacking lot of things
soviet having body armor(all BR), best smg on all tiers, best BR2 and BR3 SA rifle, etc.
idk what is wrong with demanding balance to game with historical reload. soviets were expected to reload with stripper clips in field and were only issued 1-2 magazines for emergency use. also it made logistic easy cause they could use clips from other soldiers that were using mosin nagant.
United States: All-level aircraft advantage, infantry combat disadvantage
Soviet Union: Level 3 has overall advantage, Level 5 has overall disadvantage
Germany: Level 3 has overall disadvantage, Level 5 has 50% disadvantage (not a big loss)
Japan: Level 3 has 50% overall advantage, not a big loss.
Additional: [3-revised model tanks] can attack KV1
Japan: Level 5 has overall infantry combat advantage
Aircraft and tanks do not suffer a disadvantage at 50%
Now the highest demand is for a tank from the Soviet Union.
Germany level 3 requires the entire system.
Japan is requesting a bomber of level 5.
It seems that there aren’t any particularly urgent demands in terms of public opinion in the United States.
I recently came across a prototype test vehicle fitted with the T99 rocket launcher on the M3A4 chassis. If this vehicle gets added to the game alongside the T99, M26 and the Organ, they will deliver absolutely devastating ground firepower.
The United States would become overwhelmingly dominant in rocket artillery between BR 4 and BR 5.
For now, semi-automatic weapons are not the mainstream. Submachine guns are still the primary choice at BR 2 and BR 3. The German submachine guns, however, still lack proper improvements and buffs, putting them at a disadvantage compared to their Soviet and American counterparts. Japan has greatly boosted its submachine guns via updates, so Germany is definitely in need of buffs right now. That said, I will not accept nerfing other nations’ vehicles just to make up for Germany’s shortcomings. The proper solution is to strengthen German equipment instead.
I haven’t used the G43 in ages.
It would be fantastic if it were moved down to BR 3. Free-to-play players would surely be thrilled.
AVT was replaced by AVS. Or it couldn’t defeat 421 or 422.
Fedorov’s troops were short of men. On land, the tank was crushed.
There is no advantage on the plane.
In addition, the players’ abilities are somewhat lacking… 【This is still praising him!】
where? all nations on all BR have planes with similar firepower and performance.
where exactly?
wtf disadvantage… except tank, everything else is best in every category or just copy of german TT
what disadvantages? iirc on BR3 it is balanced with US and it is at disadvantage vs soviets cause of KV1, better smg and SA rifles. what is 50% disadvantage on BR5?
again with 50%. wtf is your measurement of advantage and against whom?
If you don’t understand, then
It’s likely that you don’t play games much.
As long as you are among the gamers, then
Everyone who knows would understand what I’m saying.
These are basically the consensus of all players.
The faction that is currently most eager to strengthen is Germany’s 1.2.3 level technology tree.
The other factions are currently managing to get by somehow.
Although the Soviet 5th technological tree is lacking a tank, it’s not that urgent.
So all the posts in the adjacent thread are calling for strengthening. FNAB43
That weapon has actual data to prove its existence. There are also documents that confirm it has a firing rate of over 800 rounds per minute.
Then, after upgrading in the game, the firing rate will be around 900 shots per minute.
Then, it can be placed in Level 3 and used as an SMG weapon in the technology tree.
Leveling the weapon usage balance
The Soviet Union had the hurricane SMG. Japan has Southern SMG.
The United States has Thomson SMG.
Only SMG from Germany is very poor and is completely at a disadvantage.
Yeah, lately I’ve seen plenty of posts about Germany calling for balance buffs. Some requests got approved, while others are still unanswered—looks like we’ll have to wait another hundred days. It’s such a shame for the G43, which is such a key weapon. Back when the Manchuria map update dropped, the submachine guns for Japan and the Soviet Union both got buffs and became really strong.
Germany level 3 - Completely at a disadvantage
SMG has slow firing speed and low ammunition capacity. It is calling for FNAB43 to increase its firing speed.
Submachine gun has slow reloading time. It is calling for G43 to be moved to level 3.
Tank is too fragile and unable to withstand attacks. There is no good solution for this. Maybe the 4th assault tank should be moved to level 3 to solve the problem.
Fighter jet can conduct air combat but has no ground-mounted weapons.
It is still making a request for 250-kilogram payload for the 109.
Bomber lacks aircraft capable of conducting air combat as well as ground attack. It is calling for the 110G2 to be moved to level 3.
Everyone’s been calling for adjustments, but I still don’t get why so many players oppose the G43, which is why related votes never pass.
This weapon would fit perfectly at BR3 with performance matching the SVT-38, and it would be great for new players. We just need to separate the progression of the G41 and G43, so people won’t have to pay extra for the Walther and Mauser G41 just to get a decent semi-auto. Besides, the ZH-29 has long outshone the G43 at BR4.
As for the Japanese faction, that’s on DF. They turned at least three magazine-fed semi-automatic rifles into box-fed variants. I only have viable semi-autos now because I stocked up on magazines back when tech trees were merged.
This reminds me of Rainbow Six Siege, as well as the balance approach in the early stages of Helldivers 2. By constantly looking at the data and weakening popular weapons and items to force players out of their comfort zones, the player count dropped sharply. Then, the developers made a 180-degree turn. I still think it’s much better to enhance other weapons than to weaken the popular ones.
I have always been curious. It seems that everyone has quite different opinions on the strength of the different factions. I wonder if it is because the time zones, servers, or player levels of each country’s players are different. On the Eastern European server where I play, at 9 o’clock every night, when playing BR5 of the Soviet faction, out of 10 games, 8 of them were completely dominated by the German and Japanese BR5 teams, making it as if I was brutally beaten by Dwayne Johnson. The German BR3 and Soviet BR3 teams fought back and forth. Of course, everyone knows which side has stronger weapons, but the issue of player skills is a major problem.
So they are really foolish. This way, they are offending the players.
“Whoever is weak will be strengthened. One version has its own version of the king.”
Then there will be players developing all the factions. In each version, each version is the king. They stay online all the time, enjoy themselves all the time, keep spending money all the time, and have a great time all the time.
The online rate and the collection rate have both been improved.
However, they don’t like this model. They prefer to weaken it in order to suppress the players who are being brainwashed.
You don’t need to care about others. Just enjoy yourself the way you want to.
You should try out each faction.
Then you will find that sometimes the faction doesn’t have any intelligent players. They are all just robots acting stupidly.
Sometimes you really put in a lot of effort, but you are overwhelmed by the powerful tanks and aircraft of the enemy. There’s nothing you can do.
Sometimes you do your best and still can’t defeat the main SMG and MG weapons of the opposing side. When you feel particularly powerless yourself, that is the vulnerable part of this faction.
Sure. The values are all public. Can we publicly compare the values?