In fact, that’s how I play this game. In other games as well, I prefer to use weapons with lower power levels and compete against others. This gives me a greater sense of achievement and excitement. I will switch between various BR levels of each faction. Whether they are strong or weak, that’s fine. So I think the strength of the weapons and equipment is just secondary. The most important thing is the player.
2 Likes
Indeed, people are the most important factor.
However, the strength of the numerical value is also objectively present.
These two parts are not contradictory.
2 Likes
The skill of individual players can’t really be taken into account when looking at faction strength. That depends on each individual and can easily and massively change in between matches, times and time zones. I have had games on each and every faction where one side was dominant , even if I was being dominated on that faction just the match before. While the Soviets might have the worse players in some matches, they’ll have the better ones in others, just as that is true for any other faction.
you mean consensus where one nation has advantage, but other nations are in balance, so you call them disadvantaged?
only against soviets. it is pretty balanced against US.
idk who complained about slow reloading time of smg. usually complaints are on slower ROF and body armor that negates damage advantage of german smg.
one failed topic. easy solution for balancing is for svt38 to get clip reload which for some (obvious) reason soviet mains dont want even though it was historically accurate.
and it has gun with 140+mm penetration capable of dealing with everything on BR3 and BR4. again soviets are problem with KV1 which is almost immune to explosive/det packs and it has big advantage over BR2(unlike german BR3 tanks).
balanced cause US doesnt have BR3 attacker planes(unless you count event/premium). 110 can fight somewhat evenly against US fighters and if you need more agile plane for air superiority, then you can take 109.
i guess c7 and f2 dont exist? 20mm guns not enough?
2 Likes
Either you’re just pretending to be stupid
Or you didn’t understand
Regardless of which side it is, I don’t feel like lecturing you
That’s it
I’m voting no… like some people said the main thing would be to make the SVT-38 stripper clip fed. I’m in favour of it more because I think there needs to be a real difference between the 38 and 4. ATM those guns are basically the same.
That being said I don’t think it makes that much of a difference. Most of the time I find a safe space/time to reload where that extra 2.2 seconds really doesn’t matter…
I oppose the move for other reasons. Atm we have a choice of two semiautos with different strengths and weaknesses (The VG 1-5 and G41). This is cool. I wish we had more options at given tiers, this adds a bit of fun swapping the guns around, testing out new play styles etc. If you dump the G43 in the same tier it becomes the meta and there is no reason to use those other two guns.
The G43 rifle is much better than even the Johnson rifle.The ZH-29 rifle shoots crookedly, like a Johnson rifle.
Just adjust the stats then.
i understand that this whole topic is about avoiding svt38 reload nerf. for rest of the points provide actual arguments.
2 Likes