then you need a different game because enlisted isn’t balanced
not a bazooka
I know us still has worse tank, Germany still has crap air which tell me how good was the German air force after d day you know for history
Well it’s not an rpg so what do you want me to call it besides it’s word salad name an anti tank rocket, if it had a five letter number letter designation that help
It’s technically called the Racketenpanzerbüchse 43 but you could call it the Offenrohr, like everyone else. Or the RPzB. 43 : Racketenpanzerbüchse 43
That’s a supply and production issue, both of which aren’t represented in the game at all. It’d be pretty hypocritical to complain about weapons and introduce a whole new mechanic just to disadvantage one faction.
Also was the battle of Britiain.
Never once saw it called the RPzB43 but ok everything else is word salad that would require a tech guide to say if soell
It’s called that in game.
Yes but it still not as bad as removing prototypes
Ok which is why no one uses it
1940 to 1940 so br 2 3
Germany against uk and they still lost
Due to bad strategic decisions, again not represented in the game. The Battle of Britain was mainly lost due to the decision to stop bombing airfields and other RAF locations and instead start bombing cities, which gave the RAF the time and chance to recover and fight back.
But we should probably stop this as we’re going wildly off topic and I’d rather not see the post closed for this.
Japan gutted
Us loses entire weapon class ars
Fg42’ vs m2 tell me how many hits dies it take to down kill axdpsoldier and how much the axisvhitch about the thompson
Ussr loose the federovv at br2 so after German least affected
Ke7 and axis nothing of value was lost
Fine enough I see you in another thread
all this while you are literally suggesting danish smg in other topic to murrican TT with 10? made.
You sir are quite controversial.
3 Likes
The FG42 was indeed used by thousands of German Fallschirmjäger, unlike the T20, which was not used by any US soldiers.
And that weapon is part of WW2, unlike the T20.
It has already been explained to you time and time again why the T20 is not for the TT, unlike the FG42.But you’re still being stubborn.
Well, no German weaponry that has been used
Nobody asked for that Swiss machine gun
Well, the summary is that the FG42 and the Wirbelwind saw combat to be in the TT, unlike the T20.
I have said a hundred time 9000 guns it’s a good thing only
Tens of thousands of people served
I mean hundreds of thousands
I mean millions of people
I mean nearly 20 million
No you don’t understand
I get what are saying
This is not a misunderstanding
I am saying combat used or adopted is a standard that overwhelmingly favors Germany
And does not represent ww2
This is a debate of standards
One I point out not that it was used by paratroopers
Because they should jump out of planes
I point it out because they were an elite unit
That made up a fraction of, the armed forces, the army, the infantry ect ect
Weapons that were made in the thousands for guns
Don’t belong in the same category as tens, hundreds of thousands and millions
All that aside while all factions have rare weapons
It overwhelming favors the axis
And no that’s not how it was
Most American had m1 rifles and carbines
Germans had kar98, if luck a g41 or g43
And if hitler blessed him a fg42
So either it’s historical or it balanced you don’t get to choose the worst of both to favor the axis
So no I won’t agree to saw combat I. Any number tech tree or was adopted tech tree
Please tell me how that is fair or balanced
Not you’re warped history fair if balanced
I don’t mind removing fluff
I’d love the fg42 and t20 to be removed
Hell the m2 as well
Just leave the stg44
That feel like a documentary and not a war video game
But no I don’t like ,auntenticity, that favors one faction
So again my bar is a balanced game where every faction has ups a downs
Or historically accurate so when you can find enough fg42’ to arm 1 percent of the infantry I’ll call the fg42’actech tree weapon
Remove all the captured and prototypes and america has what that’s better than German
Hmmmm
Ummmm
The m1a1
That Germany is constantly trying the move to br3
Not opposed just move all 30 round thompsons to br3’ with some nerf as they as much at br4 as the m1a1 belongs at br2
The stinger not tech trees Germany is constantly trying to nerf
The garand grenade launcher
And
Ummm
Hmmm
Planes Germany is trying to get just as good cough f9
after murrica got buffed on par with GE that would be so horrible.
Anyway, topic is wirbelwind, pretty sure it doesnt fly.
But good rant anyway, made alot sense as you quite often do.
1 Like
I get that you think you making a point that you’re not
No opposed to adding
The best aa
Hell aa that’s great anti tank
I just don’t want infantry stompers
I want Germany to have much better fighters
Better aa to counter American fighters and attackers
Germany does not need the best attackers to counter a erica. Tanks and infantry
So just attackers that are a step below us
So ask for better aa
Ask for better fighters
Just not thecf9
just to clarify here, topic is indeed AA tank, so what exactly is your stance regarding this care to elaborate ? you give kinda mixed signals here.
Sorry just ranting, this topic is getting long I the tooth so it be hard to see how it all started. At the moment as long as no one stirs the pot again nothing, how about you how are things