This has been disproven multiple times and even if it was ‘historical’, the game was DYING back then, sides of the campaigns were abandoned, because of the asymetrical balance you want to return.
Noone’s not criticising the FG42, people are criticising you. The same as kriegerfaust is doing. You’ve been trying to suggest removal of such weapons as the T20 for a long while now, without any particular reason. He is pointing out the vast similarity of them both. Ultimately there is no reason to remove any of them.
Who is ‘they’? The developers? If you seriously think that, why bother at all? Since everything is useless.
Or maybe you think krieger and the guys at DF are in some sort of coop?
Again, how about you give it some time? Your idea was very recent and met with high regard from most of the people on the forum. There hasn’t been a vehicle update since. Developers are adding things peacemeal to keep people longer, obviously.
I’d like to see all prototypes removed from the TT but that’s not going to happen sadly. If it was adopted and produced with more than a few thousand in total it can go but something like a 100 round Stinger, of which some people have more than ever existed in the game, should in my opinion never be considered for TT placement.
Look, I do like historical / authentic games, but this is not a nuanced game. Everybody sees the direction the games is going. Of course, I do hope they add such a historical game mode, but how would you ensure people even play it? I imagine it cannot stay up regardless of playerbase because of the cost of running the servers and such. Maybe more custom match options.
I dont really have the statistics @robihr everynow and then provides but my sophisticated guess is this game isnt exactly thriving either currently.
Especiatly since they got that what ever new game they are working on.
Ass-ymmetrical balance can work and has worked on many games. Unfortunately the devs of this game are quite clueless regarding even simple red vs blue balance so the “ass-ymmetrical” balance was always prone to fail on this project.
Dunno, parameter to add weapons to game used to be " if it was used it can be added "
which obviously has been ditched some time ago favoring certain factions with theyr proto weapons.
However, its relatively difficult to imagine mental gymnastics that it requires to claim FG42 that indeed was used and T20 which never was used being “equal”
Which is one of these pseudo science claims “Because muh small number they same”
With same logic US shouldnt even exist, as from total soldiers fought in ww2 murricans were maybe ~18% so “muh small number”
Doubt the game is alive if it again takes as long as fixing ppsh41 box.
Yes because us service men making up 18% of soldiers serving is the same as a gun that could equip
.00005 percent of German service men or 5 to 10 percent of all German paratroopers is the same thing.
Again a good thing countless millions of germans did not serve with kar98s
But beyond history and numbers is balance, I never said Germany does not need better planes
Us got better planes fair is fair
But no there not as good
Are they the best usd had inww2 yes
So yes better just not as good
That’s the gate is the m26e1 as good as the kh2 and ferdidnand
No it can kill them but
Axis Br3 and 4 can kill the sp from the front
Can an allied tank do that
Ahhaahhga ahhhashha no
Well thats true, forgot that you made up this pseudo science number game which allows you to change history to your liking because “numbers”
So obviously you can also decide what is small number
Atleast they served, according to your numbers games murrica shouldnt even exist because small number
So with what logic we have t20 that is better or on par than fg42 when fg42 clearly was better ?
Or hyde ?
Or öfenföröföföfö.
It almost seems like history is again relevant when it suits your bias
Where do you get you’re numbers 16 million 400k deaths
Vs 9000 guns
Germany fought on two fronts
The us fought on two oceans
Or are you just counting deaths
If sucking and dying is the requirement in millions of combat deaths
The us and Japan can sit this out and
The ussr and Germany can play WW1 I stead
Depending on the suck bar were taking uk and maybe Italy with us
No one sucked and died like German and ussr the western front
You said america shouldn’t exist because of numbers
16 million americans served ww2
Germany 18 million
About same ussr how are America’s so ,small, it should not exist
My bad play yakuza dead souls
Eastern front
Oh yea, forgot you made this pseudo science numbers game, i cant really understand it nor I cant definitely beat you in it.
But we can always alter the subject, war on europe lasted from 39-45 and murrica had boots on ground since -44
Thats roughly not much from entire lenght of war on europe.
Im quite optimistic that eventually you figure out.
Prototype weapons have been infested in this game at least from the berlin campaign’s TT AS-44, so in the spirit of the consumers these things just cannot be made true, which is why I really dislike zombiewarrior just spouting these things instead of suggesting a custom matches update or such.
Also, zombiewarrior is rejecting any other ways of balancing (in the same suggestion as the removal of prototypes), which would make this game horrible to play.
Or mkb42 but both were used.
So fits the old criteria.
Dunno about that, seems relatively reasonable request to ask for AA while everything GE had better has been balanced out, unlike the murrican air supremacy.
I have heard about the MkB, there are many more things from the pre-merge I could list.
I think you misread me, I was talking about him suggesting removal of prototypes, while keeping everything else the same, which would disturb the current way of balancing.
Because of the player base that switches within that Faction due to its popularity, as has been the case until now, Faction X is now better than Faction B.
•First, the weapon should never have reached the TT, seeing that the Germans had difficulties with the CAS to combat it and did so with what they had.But when the Allies had the problem with the FG42, they just complained and didn’t look for a solution to combat the problem. Where they had to give the allied players an artificial balance
•This is the main reason why I brought up the T20 topic; Krieg just keeps complaining about the FG42 in every post related to Germany, especially when it comes to providing weapons. To counter their tanks and CAS And since he likes to talk about numbers to limit the FG42 So I did the same with his T20
Its actually quite difficult at times to figure out what hes trying.
Arguments varies from how he wants historically authentic game without protos, guns that were hardly used while simultaneosly having numerous suggestion of guns that were never used such as danish smg to US TT.
Sometimes the argument is crayon math science.
But rest assured if you suggest a ridable nuclear bomb while dual wielding m16’s hes all aboard.
But thats something that fits history & commonly issued.
As said sometimes quite intriguin person. Maybe just slightly controversial
Again I don’t have double standards I have two distinct standards that do not match yourself
Either everything goes rare weapons and prototypes
Or take out both, I suggest rare and prototypes because content has never or almost never been removed from the game.
You play by the rules you’re given and don’t complaining a rule change that highly favors one faction
I said it a hundred time
Either leave in both the fg42’and t20
Or take them both out
I get that you standards are used in combat or adopted by a military but those are not mine. I respect it but don’t expect me to play by you’re rules
