Not comparable at all. You can easily destroy majority of US BR3-5 tanks with panzerwerfer’s rockets. Meanwhile Calliope struggles against majority of German BR4-5 tanks even with its main gun. And its rockets are pretty much useless against those tanks.
There’s no reason for lowering Panzerwerfer. Its performance wouldn’t be affected at all. It would only bring it to lower BR matches against less skilled people.
I find it a little laughable that they’re planning to uptier the Patchett to BR II, with zero stat changes (not even a damage boost to standard 9mm levels), despite the fact that the only topic discussing a BR change (or any change to the gun for that matter) is this one:
Did they… Missunderstand the reason for why I asked for it to be moved to BR III…? It was never about balance…
I know the this Patchett suggestion is technicly off-topic because of this, but still felt like I should mention it…
Yeah, I wanted to complain about that too, but ultimately decided to save that for another day and be constructive only.
Lol. German bias so funny. Most those suggestions are ridiculous and of course they going to get voted in because most people here favor germany
Yeah def German mains 
God-tier smg. No reason it needs to be on br4. No assault rifles other than horn should be down tiered.
Literally all of those things have a negligible impact on germany otherwise they would be majority no. Just like apcbc for chaffee even though y’all voted for stugs to br2 and 3. Have marder in br2, and already have comparable stats to it already elsewhere.
Same opinion. Especially since they decided to increase its dmg (I really like the decision).
La-7, Best non-jet fighter of USSR negligible?
No MG, no turret, poor mobility, few shells, same armour as BR1 Panzer III J. Only thing going for it is the cannon which is BR3 worthy but everything else is about isn’t.
Im amazed that you are still going on about this, you are salty and you call everyone German mains that don’t agree with your ideas.
Just for you to know, most of the people that voted against your suggestion were Allied mains.
Same way if I got delusional enough to suggest something like Tiger II P on BR4, all sane Axis mains would send me to touch grass.
I feel like there are more skilled players and veterans playing low BR.
I personally doubt devs would downtier Soumi kp31 since they just announced Tokyo Arsenal BR increase and are going to buff both Ppsh41 and Mp717(r) too.
But I did include it, because I included every suggestion that fit the 75% support criteria regardless of my own opinion.
It seems that devs want some SMGs to be BR5.
While most the community obviously voted yes because most people believe that SMGs are not worthy for BR5.
Another proof why constant BR changes are necessary since Enlisted balance is changing dynamically.
I am really glad they have decided for this way.
Straight up terrible opinion. There are plenty of BR5 classes that can only equip SMGs and not ARs/SF.
Btw. And I am really glad that polls are not equal to certain implementation if ratio is extremely positive.
In my opinion, polls are not a good thing. You don’t have to argue your opinion, you don’t even have to participate in any debate. People literally are not even bothered to give a like/upvotes to suggestions for which they voted yes in polls.
Suggestions definitely shouldn’t be implemented only based on outcomes of polls.
Hey! That’s me!
well, BR changes are something that should definitely reflect player opinions though.
Polls are still far better than just the like system which could not measure negative feedback, this makes forcing through controversial changes by clans much harder.
How exactly? 20+ people can easily totally change outcome of average poll on this forum.
these suggestions and their polls each have around 50 to 100 voters while before polls 30 likes were ground breaking. Bigger sample size → more accurate data on opinions.
You need more than 20 to push something controversial like 15cm SIG uptier now.
I wiould cut the mg out and weld turret in place to get better armor and shell values. That excuse is such a bullshit reason. It’s a cherry on top but has little to no importance when it comes down to it. I can easily play a full game without using a tank mg and can easily use the stugs effectively with no turret. The ONLY viable reason to downtier stugs is to remove all HE shells. Otherwise there is no reason to use a normal tank of a tank destroyer/stug. They should be implemented as tank hunters for this to make any sense.
La7 isn’t that great. Germany has comparable 109s and fiat. Ki-100 is better plane and is two tiers lower. Doesnt have big bombs, and is not a significant threat at all. Germany also has the 109z that will shread it to pieces
The fact it was controversial to begin with shows how strong the german bias is among players. It can 1 hit a super pershing and is2 frontally. No turret and mg doesn’t work here in the slightest for it being br2. Such a joke
Alecto is still BR2, no one is bothered by that 
It’s a turd on wheels in comparison. The heat rounds absolutely suck. Plus ya know…open top, no mg, no turret
Lol