Indeed. Its a good weapon but only for a close range. I even have no chance to play my 100 rounds tommies Paras at br 5 far then 30-50 meters
Maybe the BR2 M1A1, its beast on cqc and can hold its own even at longer ranges but not exactly easy as with say lanchester.
Anyway, even M1A1 at br2 is bit controversial, it is indeed beast in cqc but does have notable downsides ( I hate the peepsights ) and takes much more effort to use on longer ranges.
M21/28 is notably easier to control, has decent sights.
Dont think its place is at BR3 where it can downtier to BR2.
6 Likes
But it has a same for as br 2 tommy. Also a little better horizontal and same vertical - not much for a 2 br difference.
For now meta at br IV - Tommy with a higher rof for 30 and Tommy for 50 rounds. That’s all.
M21/28 have no place in meta and even just a place - only a placeholder on the way to something better at br IV
Its a cool gun and we need it to be a descent br III weapon, not a placeholder
Differency is 2+2, so sure not exactly much. But is it recoild dir, less dispersion, less recoil or better sights or combination of all of those, it is by far more easier to keep on target than the peepsight tommy.
M1A1 can be alternatively moved back to BR3.
It would be and was completely redundant at rank III it was a good move to move it back to rank II where it was for a while after the merge the drum mag Thompsons should stay at high tier, they are effectively pistol LMGs which is an actual thing by the way. I’m talking about the M1A1 technically the historically best version it was lighten and made cheaper but not cheap enough because they still made the grease gun.
Could say same about KT P, but I dont think its place is at BR2.
Which probably was the point, no matter how crap it was at BR3 its by large margin better than what BR2 has to offer.
Regardless ive got bit mixed feelings of it, since it actually does have notable downsides.
I don’t know what this is I have never heard of it is it a Russian gun or something
He must be imagine this KT P. You know - if soviets aint have some good weapon - you have to imagine it.)
No no its coming back to me I think i know what he’s talking about.
There is also KBP at br I. Dunno what he is talking about actually
Maybe King Tiger P? I might be wrong
4 Likes
That would truly be irrelevant if so because there is no argument that can be made for either Tiger II being any lower than BrV the M1A1 is BrII and that’s where it should stay all of the Thompsons should be foldered behind the M1A1 because the Thompson bloat is real.
1 Like
I aint see any point why the same Thompson can be at br 2 with 20 rounds and br4 with 30 rounds
Because they have different stats and that 33% increase in ammo capacity, both per mag and in total, is a large step up.
Type 2, Type 2a
No, they don’t have different stats. Its the same stats 100%
20 rounds should be quite self-explanatory.
Even if we disregard entirely that suggested M21/28 has better handling and by far best sights, which is imo rather notable downside in BR2 tommy.
So what exactly are you after here ? JP doesnt have anything else on BR4.
And the mag differency is quite significant.
1 Like
Well, I don’t want anything, but why only one br difference where and 2 br difference here? Some bias and poor Japs again?
Type 2a should be at br 2 then. Who say Type 2 should be moved
You people told - 10 rounds of USMC M1928 and M21/28 is fine cause to a 2 br difference.
I told - its a non scence. Because
In tt type 2 and type 2a have 20 rounds and only one br difference (II an d IV BR each)
Lanchester for 32 and Lanchester for 50 - one br difference
AKT and AVT - 10 rounds and one br difference
Ke-7 and Ke-7(50) - 25 (100%) rounds difference and one br
Dp-27 and Dp-27 belted - 50 rounds difference and one br
Mg-42 and Mg-42-100 - 50 rounds (100%) difference and only one br gap
Tells me why
1 Like