The Chinese also never participated in the Battle of Berlin alongside the Soviets, but they will be there soon?
1 Like
But the Chinese fought against the Japanese in Manchuria, and since we don’t have a Chinese faction, the only option is to give to the Soviets.
…
And Americans fought against the Germans in Europe.
But we’re not sending American squads to Stalingrad because that’s insane, right?
Are you comparing an entire continent to one region of China, This makes absolutely no sense.
Americans fought against the Germans in Germany.
Soviets fought against the Germans in Germany.
Should we have American squads in Stalingrad and Moscow now by your logic?
We have a faction of the US and the Soviets, so it doesn’t make sense to give American squad to the USSR.
We don’t have a Chinese faction, so it makes sense to give it to the Soviets and Americans
Now I need to make a post about the M2 Carbine sawoff, Much more useful than trying to argue with you.
No, it doesn’t make any sense at all.
Because the Chinese never ever participated in battles of Berlin, Stalingrad or Rzhev.
The Chinese Army didn’t even fight alongside the Red Army in Manchuria.
Just because “The Allies” of WW2 included many nations, doesn’t mean at all that the Red Army fighting for Berlin should have Chinese, Greeks, Yugoslavs and Indians screaming DO NOT REDEEM on top of the Reichstag.
1 Like
we also have japan as faction, id guess thru out the war there was more chinese fighting in japans ranks than in ussr or with ussr.
2 Likes
So according to your logic, Romanian or Finnish weapons shouldn’t be with the Germans - the faction they actually cooperated with for most of the war, but with the Soviets, because that makes less sense, they cooperated far less, BUT they did fight against a common enemy! So why keep their equipment with Germany when we can just illogically dump it into the Soviet tree instead!
Or an even better example! Let’s give all Czechoslovak weapons to the Soviet Union! Who cares that Germany used them from the very beginning of the war while the Soviets didn’t use them at all? After all, the Soviets didn’t use the Type 88 either! And hey… the 1st Czechoslovak Army Corps fought on the Eastern Front! Czechoslovak volunteers, just like those mentioned Chinese volunteers in the Red Army!
Perfect. By your reasoning you should be demanding that Czechoslovak, Romanian, Finnish, Polish and weapons from a bunch of other smaller nations be added to the Soviet faction, simply because they don’t have their own tree, and the fact that most of those weapons are currently in the German TT is just too logical… So let’s put them into the Soviet TT purely because it’s illogical!
Wow… This can’t be real…
Once again
But the Chinese fought even though they were fighting independently.
Greeks and Indians don’t make sense to be added to the USSR and I think Yugoslavs will never be added unless we have the Balkan campaign at the end of the war, which is very unlikely.
We got the Allies but not the US. There’s a difference
The faction name is USA not allies despite both being right
The menu and battle names are different, I’m going with the accurate one (which isn’t USA)
The Chinese fought alongside the Japanese in Manchuria, so it would be interesting to include them, even though many people don’t like it. I’m writing a post about it.
USA is written in te lobby
Yes, but it’s just wrong. That’s not what the faction is nor is it what the faction is called in victory messages
Once again, according to your logic:
USSR fought Japan in 1945, China fought Japan in 1945 => Chinese squads as USSR in Stalingrad = OK
Then:
USSR fought Germany, Finns fought Germany in 1944-45 => Finnish squads as USSR in Stalingrad = OK?
Ok whatever
You are right. And logically, Chinese weapons that were widely used by the Japanese - unlike by the Soviets… should either be in the Japanese tree or in an independent Chinese faction (which doesn’t exist).
Just like the weapons Germany captured in various European countries and then used itself.
So Type 88 for Japan, not for the Soviet Union, hm?
2 Likes