The Chinese forces during WW2 were far more coordinated with the Western Allies, with support from the USSR being fairly limited once the Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact was signed.
1 Like
That’s because of balancing issues, isn’t it? Sigh, 6.6 damage is no longer suitable for top-tier matches now. With the new pre-order pack, the Soviet faction already has three premium squads equipped with PPSh SMGs. I’m growing increasingly concerned that without adjustments to their strength, it’s only a matter of time before they’re removed to make room for new content. As assault rifles and automatic rifles continue to improve in damage and fire rate, the advantages of the PPSh have almost entirely diminished. Just like the LAD—it really belongs at rank 3 anyway, given its limited ammunition capacity.
Adding it to the tech tree feels too敷衍. If they really removed this, we could demand new Soviet weapons from DF again—that would actually be a good thing for the Soviet arsenal.
Then we could request that this weapon be added to the Soviet faction as either a premium squad or an event-limited squad, forming a complete Chinese-themed unit. That would still benefit the Soviet faction.
So I oppose adding it to the tech tree.
Didnt they have some kind of soft block system back in the days ?
aka equipment X has least chance to appear in map Y, only if the game cant be populated otherwise.
But generally, this “issue” doesnt really bother me. But I dont really mind either if theres somekind of soft restrictions added.
Makes as much sense as putting Italian stuff in the German tech tree…
1 Like
Italians and Germans had joint operations (like North Africa / Southern Italy) and were part of a military alliance, whereas USSR not never fought alongside the Chinese, but also fluctuated between supporting Kuomintang/CPC.
2 Likes
Again, you caught on lies my friend
TOP SECRET
Copy No.1
To be returned within 6 days to the 1st Department of the HQ of the 2nd Ukrainian Front
DECRYPT
CIPHERGRAM NO.______
To______ Sent 23.8.45 20:20 ______ Received 24.8.45 11:00
24.8.45 11:55
Received by the cipher unit______
Especially Important
By radio
To Comrade ZAKHAROV.
On 22.8.45 at 16:50, GOTOVIL[?] met a partisan detachment of the 8th People’s Revolutionary Army of CHINA, strength up to 150 men, detachment commander Colonel SHIGEDA. They were waiting, as the designated point for the detachment, which arrived on 18.8.45 to meet with Red Army units, having received an order from its headquarters to cut the RAILROAD to hinder the advance of the Kwantung Army. Currently, the detachment has my permission to begin linking up with units of the 8th Army.
ZHAMLIKHANOV
No. 403/sh
Decrypted by ______ 24.8.45 13:12
Typed by— copyist
Dispatch No.13:50
Responsible for 2 copies.
Copy No.1
Encoded by
Verified: Chief of the 5th Section, 1st Department
2 7 F— mark
Time limit 24 hours
3 Likes
In that case, we might as well turn this into Battlefield 6 and just let everyone have everything… Mixing nations wildly just to expand the arsenal, even when they absolutely shouldn’t be together, is awful.
If you want China as some kind of sub-faction, then it should be under Japan, as the puppet state the Japanese established. But adding them to the Soviets is absurd!
2 Likes
No because
- Enlisted is arcade and no longer has historical accuracy, now it’s just authentic
- Honestly, it’s weird to see Chinese squads in Europe, but i can get over it
- It’s complicated to implement
2 Likes
Well, is this an absurd?
Copy.
1ST FAR EASTERN FRONT
18.8.45 BY TELEGRAPH
The 3rd Brigade, near the town of Boli[?], on 16 August, units of Skupsky[?] captured 45 officers and up to 2,000 men, led by the regimental commander.
Manchurian partisans, influenced by our propaganda, in the Huadi-Hoida[?] area, engaged in combat with retreating Japanese forces, destroying 20 Japanese soldiers in the process. The partisans relayed a report to the Red Army command, requesting that we take from them the captured weapons and ammunition seized from the Japanese.
P.p. KALASHNIKOV
Verified:LIEUTENANT COLONEL
And these “historically accurate”, “authentic” and “no longer” definitions have been set by… you?
1 Like
Chinese regiments defending Moscow, Stalingrad or Rzhev is the epitome of absurd.
Do I really need to spell this out to a Russian/Soviet person like yourself?
3 Likes
Chinese soldiers in ussr service 13 000 new 36th division xinjiang invasion
Yes only one example but I doubt it comes close to 1 million
Chinese soldiers in Japanese service 1 000 000
Do you mean this one?
Where exactly do you see their service as part of Red Army in WW2?
1 Like
My bad I need to go to 
No? They even wrote it before the merger, now they’ve removed it and added “authenticity”
Vika, did you seen by the way chinese volunteers in Normandy? Tunisia? Nothing bothers you. I wonder why no its boring cry about them on su side, but not there? why you see it here but don’t see the same squads in allied side?
Its a retorical question
Yeah and I quite happy about chinese friends join Soviet side which was describe in a historical documents
Btw want sent my regards to a chinese players, looking forward to participate
1 Like
Dicky,
-
Learn how to communicate in a civil and non-asshole manner
When you say “nothing bothers you”, you’re supposed to find my quote where I say “Chinese squads in Normandy are fine”. You will find complete opposite if you look.
Yep, historical documents of Chinese in Stalingrad.
Sure, Dicky.
PS
Chinese Voicelines Replaced By English Mod
[MOD] (WIP) BF1/V Polish voiceover replacing Chinese
4 Likes
Enlisted is not a place of historical accuracy since 2023, maybe even earlyer. We all know it.
How I can build mg with a hummer dam
Replace the voice as well if it so bothers you, pal. No reason to leave people without good content they wait so much.
They look 99 as the all other soviet soldiers