This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I wonder why still aint block me. Bunch of guys here flag all my messages. They just do not want to opposite side and real facts - bd hold 100% of 9mm bullets from some distance.
And please stop protect those who blame people by nation
Ah yes, IgorHistory.com dokcqments.
And anyway, no one cares. This is game balance related topic rather than TotallyCredibleIgorHistory.com subject.
If you do not have any documents which can say something to prove your words - well, better keep silent. Some fake websites makes your position even weaker
Is this again insult by nation?
documents or no documents doesnt change the fact that in game cosmetics shouldnt affect gameplay. if body armor is needed to be a game mechanic, then it should go into bag slot and it should be available to all nations.
I would do this:
- I would remove the cuirass bonus from Customization (customization should not affect gameplay, but is needed to stand out from other players)
- I would transfer the cuirass to the backpack slot (I would make this a factional feature in the game)
- In the backpack slot, I would write that this cuirass gives 10% protection.
Addition: In the game, when customizing fighters, pouches and backpacks often appear, but they do not give anything, since they are in customization, and not in the Backpack slot
I would also remind you that Enlisted is an arcade shooter in the first place and is not a simulator.
Probably ? Credibility was the big question.
Also this once again, even its said numerous times already.
To who? Autor - Yuri Ponomarev, Scientific Editor of Kalashnikov Magazine. This is a magazine of a worldwide known concern, produce AK series. You so funny guy.
What about this?
Document No. 1 / Negative No. 01246. View of the steel breastplate SN-42 with bullet impact marks.
Distances of firing are indicated in meters. Index “b” denotes a bullet with a steel core, index “c” — a bullet with a lead core.
victim card again huh ? ![]()
Anyway. Mods are free to clean your posts.
I believe this is also off-topic as the subject has been explained now quite many times to you.
once again
Нательная броня Красной Армии. Часть вторая | Оружейный журнал «КАЛАШНИКОВ» this is most autorable source lol. Bring me something which can cancel it or stay a clown, adios
Guy is unhinged… just block him ![]()
Could be, engrish forum so I dont understand the cyrillics.
Your tests however were done during time when father sunshine wasnt very happy about failures or meeting production requirements.
Hence its fairly reasonable to question these tests credibility.
I believe someone earlier did say hes volunteering to shoot you point blank while you wear that armor.
I think that would be more than enough prove from your side.
Arent you something ![]()
Yeah he’s undeniably out of line. And it’s not surprising as this is kinda typical behavior from him
I have been playing this game since the Enlisted Closed Beta Test, and I have seen how the developers of this game tried to play “Realism”, “Simulator” and “Historicism”, and what happened after that when there were only bots in the opposing teams. Therefore, Enlisted developers have followed the right path, the path of Symmetrical balance. But alas, Cuirasses break this balance in customization. People who talk so much about maintaining this protection just don’t want to lose their unfair advantage, which remains as an atavism of the times when developers wanted “Realism”. And please remember terms like “GAMING CONVENTION”, which is needed for balance and interesting gameplay, and “ARCADE SHOOTER” - what is Enlisted game?
gaming convention- by this I wanted to say that it is acceptable for a game, especially an arcade shooter, to make edits that contradict Realism in order for the gameplay to be comfortable and more honest.
This is an unconditional lie by a supporter of a certain side. I will explain why. In our game, every weapon is meticulously aligned with the documents. For many years, the characteristics have been changing according to the documents. And now you dare to claim that there is no alignment. This is a blatant lie. If we consider the documents in the weapons, then we must adhere to a unified principle.
And again - now word about singuto. Why you keep calm if you so care about balance?
certainly…
mg42 ROF range 900-1500 - devs chose 900
fnab ROF range 400-800 - devs chose 400
mp40 range 500-550 - devs chose 500
pps42/43 ROF range 500-600 - devs chose 600 and 700
stg 44 ROF range 500-600 - devs chose upgraded ROF of 650
as 44 ROF 600 - devs chose upgraded ROF of 660
documents show that svt38 was primarily reloaded with clips, with soldiers having 1-2 extra magazines for emergency reloads, devs chose magazine reload.
“A supporter of one faction.” The accusation is dismissed. I don’t mind if cuirasses are a faction feature, but they should be moved to a backpack slot that can be purchased with silver. Customization should not affect gameplay.
Since there will be a balance, you have more protection, but you also have fewer bullets, which is a balance. Instead of having protection and the opposing team player not having it. Therefore, it is necessary to disable the protection of the breastplates in the customization and move the cuirasses themselves to the backpack slot
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

