Great! Then we can just remove it, and no one will notice!
Jolly good.
19 Likes
If u can’t cope with a 10 percent health feature being removed you should uninstall the game.
9 Likes
That’s the same cope argument that you whiners always come back with. Do better. Meanwhile I bet you all run the Tiger II H and P47 in your lineups 
Also acting like the only thing soviets have is body armor LMFAO
9 Likes
Can I ask you a question about one of the most popular Combat Ratings in Enlisted?
- What is the strongest tank on the 3rd Combat Rating? (Kv-1 L-11)
- What is the most powerful Self-loading rifle on the 3rd Combat Rating? (SVT-38)
- Which submachine gun is the strongest on the 3rd Combat Rating (PPSh-41 Sector Submachine Gun or Uragan Submachine Gun)
2 Likes
Again, you’re complaining to me about the game not being 100% A symmetrical. Only thing I’d change out of those is give the SVT38 stripper clips.
WW2 wasn’t A symmetrical. In case you were wondering what the game you’re playing is about.
1 Like
Soviet bias is a myth and an excuse for people like you to cope and come up with an excuse to why you lose.
There is better, but I know you have not taken the time to read it or watch it.
Body armour does have a noticeable effect on gameplay, the data is there.
If your response to the obvious reality is “it doesn’t matter” and “it’s not noticeable”, then quite frankly the only response to that indeed is: “If it doesn’t matter, then you shouldn’t care that it is removed.”
The fact that you do care proves that it’s not insignificant (it’s significant enough for you to liken it to a unique faction staple). The only clown here is you for not understanding that yourself.
9 Likes
I think it should be for engineers only, not just assault engineers but all Soviet engineers. And I do understand why the devs don’t wanna change it, not cause Soviet bias but because the Soviets probably already have the worst win rate in the game.
1 Like
The body armor protection should be removed.
Nothing breaks the game balance like this.
Just think: any Japanese or German semi-automatic rifle at 2-3 BR requires two shots instead of one, even at point-blank range (!), due to the body armor.
Absolutely broken.
8 Likes
Yes clearly the nation with best equipment at the bare minimum 3/5 if not 4/5 battle ratings has no strengths.
It’s not even about Russia. It’s about a cosmetic affecting gameplay. It being on the strongest nation is just the cherry on top
1 Like
I play all factions and never once have blamed body armour for me losing a gun fight. Tbh i couldn’t care less if the devs removed it but seeing every community post flooded with you all crying about it has gotten very old very fast. Just give it a rest already.
1 Like
@ImpostorWhenSUS , when you have to create a topic about this problem for the third time (after the Soviet trolls have done everything possible to close this one), I advise you to make the poll only two options.
4 Likes
Please do not confuse the game and real life. Real life is about supply, strategy, cunning, and more. Enlisted is an arcade shooter game, and it must have balance. If you want an asymmetric balance, then why did you add a t-20 Automatic Rifle to the game? Why did they add Trophy Offenrors to the game? All this points to the fact that the developers are trying to make a “Symmetrical balance”, and the buff Cuirass will not do this in any way, since it breaks the TTK of most weapons, for example, the Gewehr-41 should make 2 shots instead of 1 shot.,
2 Likes
Ok, so add body armor to all factions… lol.
Why didn’t they remove the p47 or fg 42/ avt… this is playing it up as it’s not a cosmetic but it is a feature now.
I assure you, you will tire of complaining before I do.
Why did you vote no, then?
Sure makes it look like you’re just deflecting right now.
Indeed, time to just settle the matter for good.
6 Likes
I was never a fan of filling the TT with captured weapons, hence why I don’t use them.
I voted no because the Soviets used body armour in WW2 so i think it’s fine being a cosmetic that you have to pay/grind to unlock. Only thing I’d change to please people like you would be to make it more expensive.
WW2 also didnt have post-war jets and every rifleman running around with FG42 but here we are.
5 Likes
Wouldn’t please me at all.
Cosmetics should have no impact on gameplay.
If you want body-armour with effect, make it a backpack slot item.
6 Likes